Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Just some Food for Thought!

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-18-2004, 11:14 AM   #16
illdefined
Playmaker
 
illdefined's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 48
Posts: 2,631
from the post:

"Sellers also acted routinely as a fullback for Portis for the first time, helping to spring him on two key inside runs.


Gibbs called many more pitch plays than usual, which are geared to get Portis outside, and Bugel installed blocking schemes that called for lower blocks at the line, or cut blocks, designed for cutback runs like those employed by the Broncos when Portis ran for them. All of it culminated in Portis compiling the most yards rushing by any Redskins runner since 1999, when Stephen Davis ran for 183."

almost word for word as was drawn up in the gameplan thread, Gibbs finally ADJUSTED to his personnel. the week before vs. the Ravens, Gibbs had Cooley as a fullback who is catching TE with some blocking skills, but this game they put in big Mike Sellers (how often did we see him before this game?) and even though we were completely telegraphing the play, their defense and their big stud Urlacher couldn't stop it (unless by the facemask).

im so glad Gibbs finally adjusted to his personnel, as awesome as Portis is, he cannot be expected to shake off that first hit from a lineman, nor juke him from inside the tackles. the fumbles are gone, the long gains from Denver are back, and we managed a WIN!!

i'm just hoping its not too late. if Brunell could only just place a throw, we'd be a true contender. but im hoping *gulp* that Gibbs isn't being too slow with the adjustments this year (hasnt Brunell used up all his chances? that Coles overthrow...) to save the season.
illdefined is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 10-18-2004, 11:23 AM   #17
illdefined
Playmaker
 
illdefined's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 48
Posts: 2,631
heh, i dont think Portis is the kind of guy to have ever lost confidence in himself, but was losing confidence in the system he was being asked to run. and considering his size and skillset, rightfully so.
illdefined is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2004, 05:28 PM   #18
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Quote:
Originally Posted by illdefined
from the post:

"Sellers also acted routinely as a fullback for Portis for the first time, helping to spring him on two key inside runs.

Gibbs finally ADJUSTED to his personnel. the week before vs. the Ravens, Gibbs had Cooley as a fullback who is catching TE with some blocking skills, but this game they put in big Mike Sellers (how often did we see him before this game?) and even though we were completely telegraphing the play, their defense and their big stud Urlacher couldn't stop it (unless by the facemask).
Interesting...does this mean we're playing Rasby and Sellers? Does it mean Cooley is only in for passing plays? I guess I've been so enamored with Cooley's potential that I never considered he could even be a liability
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2004, 05:47 PM   #19
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
cooley played some as the fullback, but it showed that he's obviously never been a lead blocker before (or extensively)... sellers is probably the best for that job, either way, we had 4 TEs active and went with some 3 TE sets yesterday...

remember, sellers really wanted to be the short yardage back, so obviously he thinks he's got some skill at pushing people out of the way...
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2004, 05:56 PM   #20
SkinsRock
Impact Rookie
 
SkinsRock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Crofton, MD
Age: 55
Posts: 907
Quote:
Originally Posted by smootsmack
Interesting...does this mean we're playing Rasby and Sellers? Does it mean Cooley is only in for passing plays? I guess I've been so enamored with Cooley's potential that I never considered he could even be a liability
I think they are still in the process of adding more and more each week, while tweaking and adapting the system to the players strengths, so it probably won't be until the end of the season (or possibly next season) when the entire new version of Gibbs offense is fully installed. Because of that, there will be games when certain players stand out, but don't do much the following week. This doesn't do much for individual statistics, but it is huge for when other teams are trying to gameplan against us.....they won't know what is coming. For example, Rasby has had more passes coming to him than expected lately, since he's supposedly the blocking TE and the H-back is supposed to be more of a pass-catcher. Don't be surprised to see play action with Sellers in there and Cooley in blocking for running plays against GB. The element of unpredictibility is huge for an offense, and it seems like we are starting to have more of it....finally. Now if only we had a QB that could get the ball to the receivers ....
SkinsRock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2004, 07:21 PM   #21
VTSkins897
Impact Rookie
 
VTSkins897's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 890
yeah im feelin the pack stacking the box vs. us... that seems to me to be a big problem with our inept passing game and its subsequent hampering of our entire O. adjusted to personnel? maybe, and i'll take it. but that's still only 13 pts. against CHI....
VTSkins897 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2004, 09:22 PM   #22
illdefined
Playmaker
 
illdefined's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 48
Posts: 2,631
i'd say our best package is Sellers as H-Back, Cooley up on the line as TE, sometimes split out to confuse, and two receivers/Portis. Cooley has some great hands, and needs to learn how to block more and more.
illdefined is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2004, 10:02 AM   #23
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
GB is very very intent on stacking the box, even against heavy passing teams... we'll see it for sure.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 3.51428 seconds with 10 queries