"Don't embarass the team" rule

[MTK]

We can make a switch but I'm not convinced it's going to make much of a difference. We just have too many other issues, it's not all on Brunell, but he's the convenient scapegoat.

[SUNRA]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

We can make a switch but I'm not convinced it's going to make much of a difference. We just have too many other issues, it's not all on Brunell, but he's the convenient scapegoat.

10 penalties for 82 yards is something I thought we solved. Derrick Dockery has to be one of the most underserving lineman to start for this team. He still makes the same mistakes over and over.

[SkinsRock]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

We can make a switch but I'm not convinced it's going to make much of a difference. We just have too many other issues, it's not all on Brunell, but he's the convenient scapegoat.

Understood that it's not all Brunell, but sometimes it just takes a change to spark the rest of the team and make them perform better. Who knows if it will, but it certainly couldn't hurt to give it a shot at this point. But Gibbs won't do it. I hate to say it, but I was actually hoping Brunell would have gotten injured so Gibbs would have to put Ramsey in there....nothing real bad, but just enough to give Patrick 1-2 starts to see what he could do...
And as for the protection, yeah it was lacking, but it was still nothing near what it was last year.

[joehardee]

with the line blocking like that , 4 sacks- mobile be for real.

[That Guy]

so whats worse, inaccurate but non-INT passes or sacks?

umm... 2 ints and 4 sacks, check the facts, your wrong.

All this crap about ramsey, INT-King are stupid, since brunell's been here his TD/TO ratio is worse than ramsey's, and he's had a better scheme (in most people's eyes)... sailing slow balls high isn't preventing INTs, its preventing completions.