02-07-2011, 02:08 PM | #16 |
Fire Bruce NOW
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: Is Roger Goodell Good For the NFL?
Goodell has been excellent when it comes to protecting the shield, as others have said.
But Roger Sunshine drives me crazy with his pr statements. I think that owners could commit genocide and he would find some way to give it a positive spin.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
Advertisements |
02-07-2011, 02:13 PM | #17 | |
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 8,341
|
Re: Is Roger Goodell Good For the NFL?
Quote:
Make the same crime receive the same punishment irregardless of how popular/important/etc a player is to the league. These are some of the same issues you see in the NCAA. We care about the rules... as long as it doesn't affect our bottom line!
__________________
Best. Player. Available. |
|
02-07-2011, 02:15 PM | #18 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
|
Re: Is Roger Goodell Good For the NFL?
Quote:
Same goes for Halloween. Or better yet, hold the Super Bowl on a Friday and make it a national holiday.
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968 |
|
02-07-2011, 02:29 PM | #19 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Is Roger Goodell Good For the NFL?
Hey I'm all for that since my birthday falls on St. Patrick's Day!
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
02-07-2011, 02:51 PM | #20 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: Is Roger Goodell Good For the NFL?
I've tried to start a comment 3 times and each time I've stopped and erased what I started.
#1- I'm not a fan of Goodell. #2- I presume the players and owners gave him (Goodell) all his power, otherwise he's over stepping it in regards to making the "NFL" lable more important then the game itself. I know it's all about marketing and $$ but I can remember when the NFL and commish were there just to keep the owners together and on page, now it's more about the NFL image. #3- I have no qualms with NFL Europe. I actually liked seeing the foriegn players playing American ball. I liked seeing the fans getting all excited watching their teams play. I usually don't watch CFL but they have their own league built by their own millionairs. Let Europe do the same. Instead of NFL America putting it together for them. #4- Take away the BS celebration rules. If the player is taunting the opponant or fans, or if the celebration lasts more then 10 sec., or involves more then 2 people, or the player uses extra devices such as "popcorn" or "sharpies" or whatever then throw the flag. and keep it consistant. The flagged the Pack last night for "going to the ground" (kneeling), yet in the 4th quarter when the Pack made a TD and the player "went to the ground" (kneeling) no flag. Plus the penalty should be assessed on the very next play to follow which would be the field goal vs. waiting two plays later and backing them up on the KO. |
02-07-2011, 02:56 PM | #21 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: Is Roger Goodell Good For the NFL?
Quote:
|
|
02-07-2011, 02:58 PM | #22 |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,874
|
Re: Is Roger Goodell Good For the NFL?
Why did he need help from Terry Bradshaw to hold the mic during the trophy ceremony last night? IT was really weird if you were paying attention.
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs! |
02-07-2011, 02:58 PM | #23 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Is Roger Goodell Good For the NFL?
Roger Goodell:
Thoughts? Well, I think he's done a good job so far. I certainly like the player conduct rules, because the players do need to clean up their act if they are to be role models to the fans that look up to them. And let's face it, whether if they like it or not, intended to be or not, they are viewed upon as role models, especially to the kids. So, I say kudos and job well done by Goodell in those respects. I also like the ideas of making the game a bit safer to play in regards to concussions. Although, you can only take that so far before you really change the complexion of the game, and that is something I do not want to see. But, I am all for protecting the players health. But let's keep in mind that the game is and will always be a dangerous sport and injury is inevitable. The 18 game thing? I realize that's a toss up. I don't really mind seeing two extra games, although I think they would also need to have an extra bye week thrown in there to help the players rest and recover from injuries. I have no idea if that is on the table or not. I also remember reading the argument that expanding the active roster in order to balance the longer season would water down the product. While I don't necessarily agree or disagree with that, I do want to point to the Super Bowl champions, and how many of their starters they had lost during the season and even in the Super Bowl itself. Yet, they continued to improve throughout the season and caught fire in the playoffs. So, I'm not so sure I necessarily, completely, buy the water-downed product idea. But, I do understand why one would assume the quality would be less than what it is now. And as far as the expansion thing to Europe, this is what I would propose: Reinstate NFL Europe, but allow (with support by the NFL owners) those European teams to inherit the mascot names/logos that are used in the NFL. Now, I understand the ties that these mascot names have to their NFL cities and history, but we're talking about making a recognizable product based on the NFL successful in Europe. Personally, I would come closer to watching an NFL Europe game if the "Cowboys and Redskins" are playing each other, as opposed to the "Galaxy VS Fire". That's just me though. I mean, baseball does it, why can't the NFL do it? (Besides any legal ramifications.) I would think of the Redskins' European team as their farm/minor league team. I realize that NFL teams sent some of their players to the European league in the past, but I'm talking about NFL teams having their own European team. This could possibly help the development of those "extra" players we would have to enlist onto the active roster, and then maybe the NFL product wouldn't seem so "water down?" Again, I might be way out in dreamland, but I believe that is the only way I would support the NFL truly expanding into the European countries. I think the travel for those teams who have to player over in Europe is already a killer for them. I would hate to think how hard that would be on a regular basis.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
02-07-2011, 03:00 PM | #24 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: Is Roger Goodell Good For the NFL?
Quote:
Clearly the SB would be better suited for Sat. so people can party throughout the night if they want to and sleep in the next day... if they choose. Instead of having to take a sick day or a day off from work or simply dragging your self in to work. |
|
02-07-2011, 03:01 PM | #25 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,569
|
Re: Is Roger Goodell Good For the NFL?
I could live with a Saturday night SB.
|
02-07-2011, 03:09 PM | #26 |
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
|
Re: Is Roger Goodell Good For the NFL?
I'm all for a "forward thinking" commissioner. I don't think that you have to change things just for the sake of change.
18 Game Schedule: Not for it, I think it's overkill, it will lessen the impact of a single game, players aren't for it, fans aren't for it, why do it? I know the answer. Europe: We don't have a English Premier Team here, they don't need a NFL Team there. Sorry, expansion waters down the competition level. I like personal conduct policies but RG needs to have someone handle that for him. Saturday Super Bowl: A good idea. |
02-07-2011, 03:10 PM | #27 | ||
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: Is Roger Goodell Good For the NFL?
Skinsguy,
With out quoting everything... Quote:
Quote:
|
||
02-07-2011, 03:13 PM | #28 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: Is Roger Goodell Good For the NFL?
Skinsguy,
Also... Quote:
|
|
02-07-2011, 03:26 PM | #29 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 53
Posts: 2,665
|
Re: Is Roger Goodell Good For the NFL?
I generally like Goodell. My only huge complaint is how he destryed the NFL Draft just to try and make a couple more bucks. The Saturday of the draft was always one of my favorite days of the year. A day of football in the middle of the offseason. A day to sit back and eat drink and talk about football. Now it's so spread out...only 1 round on the first day...round 2 starts in the middle of Friday rush hour on the east coast and Saturday only has the late rounds. That day was practically a holiday for me and Goodell destroyed it!
__________________
Section 116 Row 19 “Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.” www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub |
02-07-2011, 03:35 PM | #30 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
|
Re: Is Roger Goodell Good For the NFL?
Quote:
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968 |
|
|
|