|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-03-2011, 09:57 AM | #16 |
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,505
|
Re: Week 3 TQBR Rankings
^Eli and Schaub really have surged up the charts
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
Advertisements |
10-03-2011, 11:27 AM | #17 |
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,468
|
Re: Week 3 TQBR Rankings
Yeah Matt Hasselbeck has really suprised me so far. The Titans are looking good with him at qb.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team |
10-03-2011, 04:52 PM | #18 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
|
Re: Week 3 TQBR Rankings
surprise, grossman is in the middle at 46.9... average.
|
10-03-2011, 11:06 PM | #19 |
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The ATX (formerly Balmer)
Posts: 1,125
|
Re: Week 3 TQBR Rankings
And a bigger surprise? Campbell is statistically in the top 10, yet nobody thinks he's the reason the Raiders have won or lost any of their games.
Which is pretty much what I thought while he was here.
__________________
"To bring a Sherm Lewis in to a Jim Zorn and whoever his offensive coordinator is, it's like bringing in another man to help teach you how to make better love to your wife or something." -- Tre Johnson |
10-04-2011, 01:48 PM | #20 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 12
|
Re: Week 3 TQBR Rankings
grossman is finally average! yay!
|
10-04-2011, 02:00 PM | #21 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Week 3 TQBR Rankings
Matt Hasselbeck doing his best late-career Boomer Esiason impression.
Our QB next season, Chad Henne, still ranks in the top ten despite having to run daycare for Reggie Bush and Brandon Marshall. But he's injured now, which I guess just drops the price.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
10-04-2011, 02:49 PM | #22 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
|
Re: Week 3 TQBR Rankings
Not a big fan of any stats that come from a TV network. I understand the work that's being done and the reasoning behind it. But it's just another tool to use in a player evaluation and has too many subjective areas in it.
I like the old QB rating, just give me the raw numbers, no analysis. I can do that myself by looking at the game. To me this is a case of statistical analysis gone wild, this stuff may work for baseball which has far less variables, even to a degree in basketball. But far too many variables to accurately account for in football. I don't need a stat to tell me that I'd rather have Elway, Unitas, Starr or Baugh under center for me rather than Pennington, Culpepper, Schaub or Flacco.
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996. Last edited by Slingin Sammy 33; 10-04-2011 at 02:55 PM. |
10-04-2011, 07:35 PM | #23 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
What source are you a fan of then for stats?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
10-04-2011, 08:00 PM | #24 |
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: Week 3 TQBR Rankings
Traditional QB rating of Shanahan coached QB's only means so much. With Shanahan you're going to have a lot of guys that are throwing under 60% due to the emphasis of trying to push the ball down field and with the current system a huge emphasis is placed on completion percentage. John Elway for example frequently was rated in the high 80's under Shanahan. Usually if the QB is rated in the high 80's that's a good sign in this system.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
10-04-2011, 08:27 PM | #25 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: Week 3 TQBR Rankings
Quote:
And some people do think Campbell is a key part of the Raiders success. |
|
10-04-2011, 08:30 PM | #26 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: Week 3 TQBR Rankings
Quote:
Kyle's offense has greater emphasis on effciency in the passing game. If we're looking for the statistical signs of the offense running at a high level think Matt Schaub not John Elway. |
|
10-04-2011, 10:54 PM | #27 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,429
|
Re: Week 3 TQBR Rankings
StatLine Check:
PC -- PA -- YD -- % -- YPC -- TD -- LONG -- INT FUM.RATING 79 129..........1,021.....61.2.....7.92.....6........ ..61..........3.....1.....91.9 83 143............989......58.0.....6.92.....6....... ...40..........5.....2.....78.7 99 152..........1,273.....65.1.....8.38.....7........ ..77..........5.....3.....92.9 80 125..........1,066.....64.0.....8.53.....8....... 74..........2.....2.....105.6 That is the 4 NFCE QBs, anyone care to rank fill in the names? (ours ain't at the top) but i did think this was interesting to compare with out the names assoc. edit: i hate trying to format tables on this ugh Last edited by CRedskinsRule; 10-04-2011 at 11:08 PM. |
10-05-2011, 12:17 AM | #28 | |
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: Week 3 TQBR Rankings
Quote:
Whoa, how did you do that? Just type [code][/code']?
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
|
10-05-2011, 02:44 AM | #29 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: Week 3 TQBR Rankings
Quote:
Rex Eli Vick |
|
10-05-2011, 04:39 AM | #30 |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 13,987
|
Re: Week 3 TQBR Rankings
......and which one has a super bowl ring?
__________________
....DISCLAIMER: All of my posts/threads are my expressed typed opinion and the reader is not to assume these comments are absolute fact, law, or truth unless otherwise stated in said post/thread. |
|
|