09-17-2012, 12:17 PM | #16 |
Fire Bruce NOW
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: How bad is our secondary?
Agreed. Also, more cowbell.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
Advertisements |
09-17-2012, 12:22 PM | #17 |
You did WHAT?!?
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 35
Posts: 14,169
|
Re: How bad is our secondary?
Outside of Russell Wilson, who wouldn't play here, who is that magical third round pick who is contributing right now.
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is. |
09-17-2012, 12:34 PM | #18 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,347
|
Re: How bad is our secondary?
Any word on Josh Wilson's injury? He got a concussion, no?
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
09-17-2012, 12:48 PM | #19 |
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,609
|
Re: How bad is our secondary?
No one here for sure and then you name a prime example and dismiss him lol. Most are getting playing time, ours is stretching out street cloths walking around looking like a hybrid Grimace and ChumLee. Glad your happy with our CB, Safety, and Tackle talent.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
09-17-2012, 12:55 PM | #20 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 79
|
Re: How bad is our secondary?
Okay lets look at this at a fundamental level. Since Shanny was hired he has addressed every aspect of the team in 3 years, yes, but secondary is easily the least "worked on" or improved area. When he came in he very obviously felt that Secondary and TE were the only areas that were RELATIVELY set at starter. He even talked publicly about this, placing the other areas of the team at a higher priority in the long term planning (to stop the bleeding so to speak at areas that were far worse off at the time).
So in three years: QB: multiple moves, multiple top draft picks, trades: Much improved but at a huge price WR: 3rd round and later picks, top free agent signings: Much improved but still a question mark and at a big Cap hit. OL: Multiple top picks, trade, might have been hampered by Cap: Work in Progress but improved DL/LBackers: Multiple top picks, good signings: Much improved but need a top inside LB very soon. DB: very few picks none high. a lot of "patchwork" temporary fill ins, one good signing, one solid late round draft pick, a LOT of losses: most neglected area of the team. Drilling down: a few late round picks made. They simply haven't HAD the picks to draft a high prospect DB without sacrificing other areas. Who do you sacrifice and who do you pick in their place? Price Amukamura (injury prone) instead of? Subtract one of Kerrigan, RGIII, J. Jenkins, Trent Williams, or subtract a lesser lower round pick and we don't necessarily get a starter? Gomes seems like a keeper late draft picks, but they've lost talent at a higher rate than they can replace it. They lost Landry due to chronic injury (and self entitled character). Signed Atogwi, but he didn't work out due to injuries. Lost Carlos Rodgers, primarily because the guy couldn't catch a cold, until he suddenly decided to stop memorizing the eye chart OR he got caught doing it by San Fran, suddenly with improved eye sight, he's got fly paper hands. Still a low character guy, who felt entitled to be paid big by the Redskins despite probably dropping more game finishing interceptions than anyone in Skins history. So of course he talked down on his former team just like Landry, proving that we didn't want him anyway... Not interested in punks who blame everyone but themselves... especially when said punk clearly faked his eye exams or at the VERY LEAST didn't take his poor eye sight into account AFTER HE FOUND OUT ABOUT IT, and STILL talked crap about the Skins. Seriously I know there's still some people who liked Rodgers but when you say "there's still guys who want out of there" AFTER you found out your eye sight was bad when you played on that team? That's a b*tch move... As far as moves they could have made, their were some, they could have resigned Rodgers, except he made it very obvious he didn't want to be here (after the fact see above). Nnamdi was available, not sure why he would have wanted to sign here as opposed to "the dream team"... Otherwise not a lot of Young free agents with upside, except Josh Wilson, who happily DID sign here, in what was undoubtedly an upgrade, as he's now our CB1, he should be a good CB2 though. Not your primary cover corner. Conclusion: Three years isn't enough time or draft picks to address every area of the team. I conclude this because it's right there in black in white. Point out the starters they should have drafted and then pick who you subtract from the team to draft him. They have had literally NO chance to use a high pick on a top DB without sacrificing an IMPACT player in other areas that were even less stocked with talent than the secondary was. The previous administration left them with a big contract (Hall), two low character guys coming into their first free agency with talent but also with clear undeniable issues and zero depth. |
09-17-2012, 01:15 PM | #21 |
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 1,074
|
Re: How bad is our secondary?
Not as bad as the front 7 was yesterday....
|
09-17-2012, 01:17 PM | #22 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: How bad is our secondary?
Agreed. If the scheme isn't right, can't always blame the players. I think Haslett stayed with the zone way too long. Plus, sometimes, a team just doesn't match up well with another team. I've seen that happen quite a few times, no matter how good or bad the team is usually.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
09-17-2012, 01:22 PM | #23 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: How bad is our secondary?
|
09-17-2012, 01:27 PM | #24 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: How bad is our secondary?
Concussion, not yet cleared medically for Week 3.
Griffin would start in his place.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
09-17-2012, 01:27 PM | #25 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: How bad is our secondary?
Let's go through this again for those who are a little slow on the uptake.
D. Hall is among the worst CBs in the league. It can be proven both quantitatively and subjectively. He just is. He's good for a few TOs a year and maybe a pick-six...that's it. Otherwise he spends the game getting beat constantly and has for seasons now. |
09-17-2012, 01:44 PM | #26 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,347
|
Re: How bad is our secondary?
Great another D. Hall pissing match. As if having to deal with losing a game is not enough.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
09-17-2012, 01:51 PM | #27 |
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,609
|
Re: How bad is our secondary?
lol...i like the comments here that "Gano woulda made that" referring to the 62 yarder....
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
09-17-2012, 02:21 PM | #28 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 5,323
|
Re: How bad is our secondary?
Bring back Ade Jimoh!
|
09-17-2012, 02:27 PM | #29 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: RatherbeinDC, TX
Posts: 3,060
|
Re: How bad is our secondary?
Didnt the skins have Ryan Clark once upon a time??
__________________
Lafayette, we're here. HTTR. You wern't a bunch of losers on 10-27-14. |
09-17-2012, 02:51 PM | #30 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: How bad is our secondary?
Yes. I wished at the time we had not cut him.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
|
|