![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 |
|
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,596
|
Re: Toughest off-season ?
it seems to me that there has been more bad than good this offseason. all those reasons they mentioned above were great and all, but far and few between. hopefully it will settle down some.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team |
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
#17 |
|
The Bringer of Digital Bling
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lindenhurst NY
Age: 55
Posts: 893
|
Re: Toughest off-season ?
With all the controversy this off season and the lack of signing "Big" names like they have in off season’s past creating huge expectations maybe this year they will be underestimated and surprise a bunch of people including us!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 8,341
|
Re: Toughest off-season ?
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
)Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I don't feel this off-season was the lack of big names. I think as skins fans we were getting sick of the big names. I love the Griffens (kinda big) and Marcus Washington signings (kinda big) young guys that still haven't hit their full potential. You get them for a reasonable price and the upside is nearly limitless. If they flop then you don't have a Brunell-esque contract sitting on your cap. I feel that we were disappointed because we felt we had a pretty damn good team, especially on defense, and we let some key parts get away. The draft also left a lot of us scratching our heads. Hopefully our defense can at least stay the same and if our offense improves just a little bit then we could easily be a playoff team.
__________________
Best. Player. Available. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Yorktown, Va
Age: 57
Posts: 1,587
|
Re: Toughest off-season ?
When it comes down to the playing field here is what we got:
Bad: No Smoot, Pierce, Coles, Gardner. Good: Jansen, Rabach, Rogers, Holdman, Moss, Patten. Also Good: Gibbs 2nd year Players 2nd year in Gibbs system Better Special Teams players Jacobs moving into the 2nd receiver role (maybe) Barrow? McCune?? Could be nice in the middle... Ramsey in the full year (with some protection) Portis (with more zone blocking) Short yardage backs! I really could go on, but I don't want to sound like I'm blowing smoke up your butts! Bet your a*s, Gibbs has looked at what kept us from winning each game last year and has filled the holes. It may not be the way or what we had hoped, but he seems to have a record of doing his homework and making the correct adjustments. It is this fact that gives me the most hope for next season.
__________________
Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts. A. Einstien |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Propane and propane accessories
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Age: 57
Posts: 4,719
|
Re: Toughest off-season ?
Longest post ever? Glad to see you worked in a Spurrier refernce, Daseal! I was getting worried!
Good post!
__________________
Hail from Houston! |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 8,341
|
Re: Toughest off-season ?
Hey, I went almost two weeks! And no way, I wrote one that took up 3 pages once
__________________
Best. Player. Available. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Warrenton, Virginia
Age: 45
Posts: 1,515
|
I was programmed by local cable, after a few minutes I tune out. Serious problem when I try to read that peice of the bible you just published. Seriously dude, do you think Jesus will let us put it right after Exodus, or are we stuck with before?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NoVA
Age: 57
Posts: 8
|
Re: Toughest off-season ?
Hey folks, I never posted here before but I've lurked every now and then.
I saw this thread and wanted to say that this has been a chaotic offseason, more so than I can remember and I have been a fan since the late 70's. Think about it though, in the last 10 years or so, the chaos has been more during the season, while the offseason has usually been our high point. Maybe this is when we turn the tables and actually have a season to be proud of. Just my , Hail to the Redskins!!!![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Toughest off-season ?
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 783
|
Re: Toughest off-season ?
No "Paper Lombardi" trophies this year. I feel good about this season already.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Toughest off-season ?
There are definately reasons to be concerned about this offseason. We have SERIOUS question marks at QB, WR, TE, DE and MLB. Moreover, that half of our starting lineup is different than it was last year (Ramsey, Cooley, Royal, Jansen, Rabach, Patten, Moss, Marshall, Harris, Taylor, and Daniels) raises questions about team chemistry. Finally, we lost two great players in Smoot (who was also a team leader) and Pierce.
That said, as we all know by now, major offseason additions don't secure the Lombardi trophy. Additionally, of the new starters mentioned above, only three (Rabach, Moss, and Patten) are new to the team. Third, we shed some of the unhappy players (Coles and Gardner). Fourth, Gibbs has a year of coaching under his belt, so his offensive game planning should be much better. Fifth, Gibbs has a much better understanding of "what he has to work with" and how to maximize the talent on his team. Sixth, the players are no longer new to Gibbs. Seventh, the loss of Smoot should be made up for by the acquisition of Rogers (who, even though raw, is probably more gifted and a better fit for Williams' defense than Smoot). Eighth, the loss of Pierce is made up for by the return of Arrington and the rise of Marshall. I don't think this was the "toughest offseason." Although we didn't know it at the time, the 2000 offseason was the toughest - it raised our expectations (considering we went to the playoffs the year before), messed with the cap, cost us "development time" of younger players, and hurt the Redskins' good name in the eyes of the football "experts." |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 293
|
Re: Toughest off-season ?
Daseal...you Have Waaay Too Much Time On Your Hands.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 8,341
|
Re: Toughest off-season ?
Uh, that post took like 15 minutes at the most. Most of it is quoting, which takes a lot of space.
__________________
Best. Player. Available. |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St. Joseph Missouri
Age: 49
Posts: 83
|
Re: Toughest off-season ?
Don't let them beat you down Daseal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St. Joseph Missouri
Age: 49
Posts: 83
|
Re: Toughest off-season ?
I think that it is good that everybody in the media thinks that were going to stink again. That takes the pressure off. I really like the feel of this off-season.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|