|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-02-2005, 08:17 AM | #16 |
^21^
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Age: 52
Posts: 1,630
|
Re: Skins O-line
Trade Bucs QB Ramsey for DE Rice.
Atleast that's what I'd attempt to do in Madden and throw in Royal.
__________________
^21^ |
Advertisements |
11-02-2005, 08:18 AM | #17 |
^21^
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Age: 52
Posts: 1,630
|
Re: Skins O-line
Commish would never allow it.
__________________
^21^ |
11-02-2005, 08:23 AM | #18 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: Skins O-line
joisey boy how can you say the skins did not have a chance to sign any free agent d lineman or draft any?was drafting j cambell a necessity?all he is going to do is sit on the bench all year.if the skins front office thought they really needed him,then p ramsey should have been dealt for a d lineman
|
11-02-2005, 09:32 AM | #19 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
|
Re: Skins O-line
Williams has a say in his personnel so I think it's unfair to say they haven't had the chance to make any additions.
We layed pretty low as far as defensive acquisitions went this offseason. Perhaps Williams was confident with the group he had, or perhaps there just wasn't anybody out there that he viewed as an improvement. Either way, if he wanted someone bad enough, I find it hard to believe they wouldn't have pursued that player. Carlos Rogers anyone? I'm sure Williams played a pretty big part in this decision. |
11-02-2005, 10:35 AM | #20 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 60
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: Skins O-line
Quote:
|
|
11-02-2005, 12:11 PM | #21 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: Skins O-line
i disagree.i think coach gibbs went into this season thinking one screw up by ramsey and brunell is in the game.i think he proved that by leaving brunell in the bears game even though ramsey was ready to play.for some reason this organization has little or no faith in #11
|
|
|