Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: Do you approve of the trade for Jason Taylor?
Yes 195 91.98%
No 17 8.02%
Voters: 212. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-22-2008, 08:30 PM   #286
Slingin Sammy 33
Playmaker
 
Slingin Sammy 33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheriff Gonna Getcha View Post
I think the bench press is one way of measuring how much upper body strength a prospect has. Moreover, upper body strength is of obvious importance to defensive linemen.

However, sometimes draft prospects underperform due to lingering injuries, or because they are just having a bad day. Moreover, some defensive ends who don't bench 225 pounds 35 times manage to do quite well against the run and the pass. Consider the below snippet about Terrell Suggs.

SUGGS WORKOUT HURTS DRAFT STOCK

Suggs was a dominating defensive end in the college ranks, but at 6-foot-3 3/8 and 257 pounds, which he measured in at during his workout, he probably doesn't have the size to get it done week after week in the NFL.

Strength was also not on Suggs' side, as he managed just 19 reps during bench press drills. In the 40-yard dash, his times were a very pedestrian 4.84 and 4.88. He had a 33.5" vertical jump, 9-foot-0 broad jump, 32 7/8" arm length, 7.46 three-cone drill and 4.37 and 4.47 short shuttle. Whether he's just a poor workout player or what not, teams are definitely going to be forced to think twice come draft day and this workout probably pushed him out of the top five selections.
Agree with you on the premise. My points to Drift are specifically about Campbell, who at 280-290 lbs turned in the worst bench numbers at the combine for DL, looked soft, and there were also motiviation/motor questions on him.

Also, upper body strength is not as critical at RDE or OLB (Suggs positions) as it is for LDE.
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996.

Last edited by Slingin Sammy 33; 07-22-2008 at 08:55 PM.
Slingin Sammy 33 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 07-22-2008, 08:32 PM   #287
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)

Gabe Watson also dropped to the fourth round because of poor/questionable workouts in 2006, and he's become the first round type of talent people thought he would be.

Of course, one year later, fellow Wolverine Alan Branch did the same thing, fell to the 2nd round, and his rookie year was less than promising.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2008, 03:21 PM   #288
dcsportsfan1
Camp Scrub
 
dcsportsfan1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)

I found a video about Taylor talking about his new number. There's also a pretty entertaining one of the fans reacting to Taylor being a Redskin. Check them out on comcastsportsnet.com. Go skins!
dcsportsfan1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2008, 03:41 PM   #289
Drift Reality
Impact Rookie
 
Drift Reality's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 506
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DIRTEE View Post
Drift Reality - Please tell me you are joking. Its apparent that everyone on the warpath knows about football, and I'm friends with a few NFL players and they workout all the time.

But to answer your questions (someone please turn this into a poll); I have no clue what Reggie White benched (God bless him) and I can only imagine that Lawrence Taylor benched about 100 kilos of crack rock and squatted about 100 prostitutes. Nate Newton even had a nice offseason workout.
That's pretty funny stuff.

My main point is that people shouldn't get so caught up with metrics like bench reps. and clocked 40 times in my opinion.

I'm not saying that good players don't work out or are not strong. That would be a ridiculous statement.

Anyway, let's just drop it and we'll see what happens when they strap 'em on.

Last edited by Drift Reality; 07-23-2008 at 03:55 PM.
Drift Reality is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2008, 05:45 PM   #290
DIRTEE
Special Teams
 
DIRTEE's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 256
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)

Drift Reality - I was just joking with you. I totally understood where you were going with your statement.
DIRTEE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2009, 11:55 PM   #291
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paintrain View Post
That would make this trade a colossal bust if we improved by only 5 sacks.. You'd be happy with that?
Bumping this thread.

Clayton said we could get 50 sacks. We got 25 sacks. Hey, he was half-right!

We got 8 fewer sacks than last year. I believe a schematic change is primarily responsible.

But reading through this thread, it seems somewhat insincere that people would bitch about not having a 2nd rounder this year. We got a pro-bowler didn't you hear?
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2009, 12:17 AM   #292
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)

Could Jason Taylor end up back in Miami? - The Phinsider
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2009, 12:38 AM   #293
The Goat
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)

So long JT...

That 8.5 mil could be better spent in soooo many ways.
__________________
24-34
The Goat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2009, 01:18 AM   #294
44ever
Registered User
 
44ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The Fortune Teller
Posts: 2,512
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goat View Post
So long JT...

That 8.5 mil could be better spent in soooo many ways.
Goats right 8.5 does nice things. But so does a healthy JT

Last edited by 44ever; 01-29-2009 at 01:06 PM.
44ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2009, 10:28 AM   #295
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Bumping this thread.

Clayton said we could get 50 sacks. We got 25 sacks. Hey, he was half-right!

We got 8 fewer sacks than last year. I believe a schematic change is primarily responsible.

But reading through this thread, it seems somewhat insincere that people would bitch about not having a 2nd rounder this year. We got a pro-bowler didn't you hear?
mmmmm hindsight
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2009, 12:24 PM   #296
SkinzzFan
Special Teams
 
SkinzzFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Queensbury, NY
Posts: 273
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinzzFan View Post
I hate to say this, because I really like him, but Philip Daniels could be the Skins MVP this year. I already liked our D-line, but with the addition of J. Taylor the pass rush could be downright scary! I think a 2nd rounder is a bit high, but let's face it the Dolphins had all the leverage here. Carter and Taylor coming off the ends just made the back 7 that much tougher!!

HAIL!!
Boy was I wrong! I do believe a healthy Jason Taylor would have had a bigger impact. I hope he returns next season. I hate to give up those two picks and only get the half season he played in return!
__________________
"Baseball is what we were, football is what we have become"
SkinzzFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2009, 01:59 PM   #297
SC Skins Fan
The Starter
 
SC Skins Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,555
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Bumping this thread.

Clayton said we could get 50 sacks. We got 25 sacks. Hey, he was half-right!

We got 8 fewer sacks than last year. I believe a schematic change is primarily responsible.

But reading through this thread, it seems somewhat insincere that people would bitch about not having a 2nd rounder this year. We got a pro-bowler didn't you hear?
Sweet vindication for you.
__________________
It has taken a long time, but I have finally realized that nothing I say about the Redskins will have any effect upon anything the Redskins do.
SC Skins Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2009, 02:06 PM   #298
The Goat
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinzzFan View Post
Boy was I wrong! I do believe a healthy Jason Taylor would have had a bigger impact. I hope he returns next season. I hate to give up those two picks and only get the half season he played in return!
Yeah i have to own up too... i had visions of sugar plums dancing in my head and Jason "Xerxes" Taylor dominating QBs while he wore the B & G.

Going forward I just don't see him fitting well now that we aren't facing a last minute decision. Taylor isn't real effective @ left end but probably not a huge upgrade over AC on the other side (in our 4-3 system). Like i said elsewhere as much as i respect Daniels i mean c'mon, 36 yrs of age and it's not like he was always healthy prior to '08. If cutting JT clean allows us to grab a value left end, someone who can stop the run and get a little more pressure than Evans, i'm ok w/ that.

... heard it suggested Taylor would play OLB (replacing Marcus btw things sound). F'ing no ok. Just f'ing no. Tackling, run-stopping is not his strong suit.
__________________
24-34

Last edited by The Goat; 01-29-2009 at 02:11 PM.
The Goat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2009, 02:33 PM   #299
Defensewins
Playmaker
 
Defensewins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,749
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Defensewins View Post
I would have preferred to draft a young DE but there were none worthy when it was our turn to pick. I have two concerns with this pick up:
1) While this move greatly improves our pass rush, we now do not have a stout run stopping DE. Carter and Taylor are not very strong against power running teams, they are barely over 250 and will get pushed around from time to time. We have basically two very similar DE's and the other teams will run right at them.
2) Another old guy. Taylor has been dancing on TV for the last several months and might not be in the best shape of his life. Injury is a concern.

While I share in the excitement of a potentially strong pass rush. But if you can not stop the run you are in for a long season. You have to be able to run the ball and stop the run, if you can not do that you are playing for next year.
I was actually not that far off.
Defensewins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2009, 03:36 PM   #300
MdBluefinCrab
Camp Scrub
 
MdBluefinCrab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: White Plains, Maryland
Age: 69
Posts: 56
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)

What's even more sickening is that on top of giving away a 2nd round draft pick, Vinny only signs him to a 1 year contract. Vinny does this with every big name FA. He pays them big bucks, gives away future draft picks and only signs them to 1 year contracts.
In the case of Taylor, he gets a freak injury and we don't get the expected production out of him. At the end of the season Blache lets him play his natural position, he starts to make an impact and the season's over.
Now that his contract is null and void, if we want to keep him it'll cost another 8.5 million. Shouldn't this have been negotiated in the first place? Maybe sign him to a 2 year contract where he could make his 8.5 million in incentives in the second year of his contract? At least we would have had the opportunity to see if he could add any value to our defense in, at the least, a limited role as an outside linebacker in passing situations. At least get some kind of value from giving away our 2nd round pick.
__________________
Bring the Redskins back to Washington!
MdBluefinCrab is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.54113 seconds with 12 queries