|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-02-2010, 01:37 AM | #301 | |
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: Jimmy Clausen has met with the Redskins
Quote:
And Jason....will be in on plays where we know we're going to be sacked but need to pass. I kid I kid, albeit horribly.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
|
Advertisements |
04-02-2010, 03:29 AM | #302 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Orleans, LA- via VA
Age: 46
Posts: 710
|
Re: Jimmy Clausen has met with the Redskins
Quote:
But you are correct, I don't like, nor want Clausen on the Redskins. I can see how I have come across as annoying, and that was part of my intention. Watching that interview annoyed me, Clausen, annoys me. I was seeing if it was only me. Maybe, it is.
__________________
Hail to The REDSKINS |
|
04-02-2010, 07:23 AM | #303 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Jimmy Clausen has met with the Redskins
So Clausen's planning on not being in NY on draft day. I wonder if that's because he's afraid he's going to get the Brady Quinn treatment?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
04-02-2010, 08:59 AM | #304 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
|
Re: Jimmy Clausen has met with the Redskins
He probably is afraid of that. If he falls out of the top 10 he could definitely suffer a Quinn-like slide down the board.
|
04-02-2010, 11:41 AM | #305 |
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 47
Posts: 1,851
|
Re: Jimmy Clausen has met with the Redskins
"I think the biggest upside that I have, and one of the things that I have over all the quarterbacks in the draft, is I've played in a pro-style offense," Clausen said. "I know how to change protections. I know how to make alerts to get to a better play. Sometimes you call two, three plays in the huddle. You have to know whether [the defense] is in an over front, even front or if they're in an off front. I know how to call the Mike ID every single time. I just know my hot [reads] and my side adjusts. It's just a lot of different things that in different offenses, spread offenses, that you wouldn't see."
Beautiful !
__________________
Catch me on YouTube ! http://www.youtube.com/user/DowntimeRB?feature=mhw5 The "punishment" by the league : "It's like getting a ticket for going too fast on a road a week ago and they changed the speed limit today" |
04-02-2010, 12:08 PM | #306 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
|
Re: Jimmy Clausen has met with the Redskins
I think Clausen could start as a rookie and do well in the right situation, he's definitely the most ready to start right away. The only question is regarding upside when comparing these QBs.
|
04-02-2010, 12:17 PM | #307 |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
|
Re: Jimmy Clausen has met with the Redskins
|
04-02-2010, 02:06 PM | #308 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Jimmy Clausen has met with the Redskins
Just removed the last couple of posts because I had a total brain freeze and didn't realize I was basically asking one scenario Tripp presented in his own Clausen thread
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
04-02-2010, 02:22 PM | #309 |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
|
Re: Jimmy Clausen has met with the Redskins
haha yeah, got deja vu on that one
|
04-02-2010, 02:29 PM | #310 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: close to the edge
Posts: 4,926
|
Re: Jimmy Clausen has met with the Redskins
Quote:
__________________
Life is brutal, but beautiful |
|
04-02-2010, 04:27 PM | #311 | |
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: Jimmy Clausen has met with the Redskins
Quote:
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
|
04-02-2010, 04:38 PM | #312 |
Fire Bruce NOW
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: Jimmy Clausen has met with the Redskins
^ The more I think about it, the more I think that we will grab Clausen. I'm not sure that ShanAllen will see the difference between Bradford and Clausen to be worth the price of a trade-up.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
04-02-2010, 07:13 PM | #313 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 351
|
Re: Jimmy Clausen has met with the Redskins
There are tons of parallels between those two. I could see him sliding but i doubt if all stays the same that he slips past the bills at 9. Personally I want us to pick him, i think we can get linemen with the rest of our picks.
|
04-02-2010, 07:18 PM | #314 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 351
|
Re: Jimmy Clausen has met with the Redskins
This may not be the best comparison but the Clausen vs Bradford seems similar to the Alex Smith/Aaron Rodgers draft. Rodgers was more experienced in a pro style offense in college but the 49ers went with the more accurate and talented quarterback. As of now Rodgers has clearly been the better player. This is the sign that makes me consider clausen.
|
04-02-2010, 07:42 PM | #315 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: Jimmy Clausen has met with the Redskins
Quote:
I mean Clausen has done well in the college ranks. No? The football in the college ranks is bigger round. If he can throw that damn ball why can't he throw an NFL football which will be smaller round? |
|
|
|