Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Start John Beck Madness Thread

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-16-2011, 07:44 PM   #376
irish
Playmaker
 
irish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by hooskins View Post
This
Its funny cause I never thought JC was much of a game manager, he always seemed lost out there. It also amazed me that for a guy that played QB his whole life he had 0 pocket awareness.

I think the Skins are better coached and schemed than they have been in years but my bigests concern with Shanny is that he has never done anything with with with a QB not named Elway.
irish is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 10-16-2011, 07:53 PM   #377
Hail to the Redskins
The Starter
 
Hail to the Redskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,687
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
No way, Kerrigan was the right choice. The QB last draft class wasnt very good. We made the right moves in the draft.

This year's top prospects are much higher quality guys IMO. Much better.
Not to start an argument, but this QB class wasn't good, huh??

Newton is lighting it up and Dalton has been very effective... leading the Bengals to a 4-2 record. Ponder looked decent in preseason as well... can't judge this class yet, really, but they aren't terrible I know that and I know there is at least 2 that are better than what we have now.

Kerrigan was the right choice... but right now, I think I'd take Dalton over Hankerson, Gomes, and Hurd combined.... that's just me.
__________________
“Sometimes it is not enough to our best; we must do what is required.”
- Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)
Hail to the Redskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2011, 08:04 PM   #378
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,505
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hail to the Redskins View Post
Not to start an argument, but this QB class wasn't good, huh??

Newton is lighting it up and Dalton has been very effective... leading the Bengals to a 4-2 record. Ponder looked decent in preseason as well... can't judge this class yet, really, but they aren't terrible I know that and I know there is at least 2 that are better than what we have now.

Kerrigan was the right choice... but right now, I think I'd take Dalton over Hankerson, Gomes, and Hurd combined.... that's just me.
Cam been super human. Locker, yet to be seen. But neither were in a position to be drafted by us. Ponder and Gabbert were reaches. Dalton, yeah id take him, but not over Kerrigan. I liked Dalton coming out...not as a first round pick. Take a look at some of the QBs coming out this year, there is some really good talent.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2011, 08:11 PM   #379
53Fan
Franchise Player
 
53Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,570
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
No way, Kerrigan was the right choice. The QB last draft class wasnt very good. We made the right moves in the draft.

This year's top prospects are much higher quality guys IMO. Much better.
Absolutely agree. Hard to argue with one of, if not the best, drafts we've had in years. And as you mention, by all accounts this years QB class should be much better. I think the FO did an excellent job and had the foresight to look ahead to next years class.
__________________
Defense wins championships. Bring it!
53Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2011, 08:44 PM   #380
pg86
No new threads for you
 
pg86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,959
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by 53Fan View Post
Absolutely agree. Hard to argue with one of, if not the best, drafts we've had in years. And as you mention, by all accounts this years QB class should be much better. I think the FO did an excellent job and had the foresight to look ahead to next years class.
Matt Barkley in a Skins Uniform? Maybe....thing is This unknown we have on the roster would really need to screw up next week
pg86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2011, 08:47 PM   #381
Bushead
Impact Rookie
 
Bushead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 782
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

What was very clear to me was on one play where Beck looked to his left where a couple routes were going, then whipped his head to the right side of the field and through an incomplete pass.

It was the first time i've felt the QB has made a progression all year.
Bushead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2011, 08:55 PM   #382
Mechanix544
The Starter
 
Mechanix544's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Fort Bliss, TX
Posts: 2,277
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

yes, beck sure did look alot more poised and cerebral than grossman, as well as heaps more mobile than fat boy. I dunno, Ive been calling for him for the past 3 weeks, but I think I truly believe that shanahan made a HUGE mistake starting grossman over beck. It put beck 4 weeks behind the power curve, but I guess being 3-2 after the grossman factor can't be looked at as a loss, it seems that lady luck was on her knees for us lately. We are truly lucky to have a winning record. Maybe Beck can show more poise back there, and start to make some plays. If he is going to show he can succeed in this league, he needs to show it in the red zone. If he can bump up our production down there a bit and limit the turnovers, this season can still be salvageable, and we could contend for the division still. If Shanahan stays with grossman, I will not watch one more washington redskin game until the guy gets benched again or cut. I just don't have the intestinal fortitude to withstand watching Grossman try to play the quarterback position any longer. If he stays with Rex, then his ego is WAY bigger than anyone thought. We will see.
Mechanix544 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2011, 09:01 PM   #383
Gtothearry
The Starter
 
Gtothearry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,525
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

9 int's in 5 games.......that is all that needs to be said. Lost by 7 points with 4 int's easily could've been a game we won.

Last edited by Gtothearry; 10-16-2011 at 09:04 PM.
Gtothearry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2011, 09:03 PM   #384
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gtothearry View Post
9 int's in 5 games.......that is all that needs to be said. Lost by 7 points with 4 int's easily could've been a game we won.
But but he's 3-2 as a starter.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2011, 09:03 PM   #385
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,505
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gtothearry View Post
9 int's in 5 games.......that is all that needs to be said. Lost by 7 points with 4 int's easily could've been a game we won.
9? IN 5 GAMES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I mean, how the f*ck can Shanny defend Rex starting another game? That is just god aweful
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2011, 09:04 PM   #386
Gtothearry
The Starter
 
Gtothearry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,525
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtbag59 View Post
But but he's 3-2 as a starter.
I say the defense is a 3-2 starter.
Gtothearry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2011, 09:07 PM   #387
Gtothearry
The Starter
 
Gtothearry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,525
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

66.5 rating so far this season. We have the 31st ranked qb!
Gtothearry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2011, 09:08 PM   #388
Mechanix544
The Starter
 
Mechanix544's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Fort Bliss, TX
Posts: 2,277
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

jeez, i feel sick to my stomach thinking that after the first week I was thinking to myself that Mike Shanahan might have been onto something with rex grossman. my god is hindsight 20 20.
Mechanix544 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2011, 09:09 PM   #389
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,505
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gtothearry View Post
66.5 rating so far this season. We have the 31st ranked qb!
nice thanks for the stat. Im using that in the S Smackdown...just a horrible QB
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2011, 09:13 PM   #390
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: Start John Beck Madness Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
9? IN 5 GAMES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I mean, how the f*ck can Shanny defend Rex starting another game? That is just god aweful
I don't think he will. Hard to imagine a worse game than the one Grossman played today.
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.99240 seconds with 10 queries