Official Redskins Free Agency Thread 2013 Part II

[NYCskinfan82]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

What a joke the Jets are...Fred in a situation with limited leverage and doesnt even accept a visit. Jets in for a 1-15-ish year.

IMO never laugh at another teams misery, just focus on our good fortunes.

[RedskinRat]

The underlying story of this free agency and draft (and hopefully for years to come) will be players wanting to play with RGIII.

[RGIII]

Originally Posted by RedskinRat

The underlying story of this free agency and draft (and hopefully for years to come) will be players wanting to play with RGIII.

And they say the Skins gave up too much?

[mredskins]

Originally Posted by NYCskinfan82

IMO never laugh at another teams misery, just focus on our good fortunes.

Why? It is part of the game.

Who are you Mr. Miyagi?

[NYCskinfan82]

Originally Posted by mredskins

Why? It is part of the game.

Who are you Mr. Miyagi?

Yeah I returned from the grave.

[RedskinRat]

Originally Posted by RGIII

And they say the Skins gave up too much?

The comparison revolts me <cough> but it's similar in magnitude <cough> as the deal <cough> that the Cowboys made for the Triplets. <Barf>

In my opinion it will be seen, in hindsight, the same way.

[NYCskinfan82]

Originally Posted by RGIII

And they say the Skins gave up too much?

The even BIGGER story IMO is what will st. lou will do with those picks, they have to hit big.

[12thMan]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

Given the circumstances the Skins are rocking this offseason so far.

Also, Dallas and the Giants have lost some key faces. And Romo's future is still very much in the air.

[NC_Skins]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

Given the circumstances the Skins are rocking this offseason so far.

I concur with this. I'm satisfied with what they are doing. The one thing I'm skeptical about is having Fletcher around at his high cap number. I mean, if the Bears weren't willing to pay Urlacher 3 million, than why in the **** are we paying Fletch 5+ mil. Hell, I'd rather have Urlacher at a cheaper cost.

[RedskinRat]

Originally Posted by NC_Skins

I concur with this. I'm satisfied with what they are doing. The one thing I'm skeptical about is having Fletcher around at his high cap number. I mean, if the Bears weren't willing to pay Urlacher 3 million, than why in the **** are we paying Fletch 5+ mil. Hell, I'd rather have Urlacher at a cheaper cost.

Because Fletcher is an integral part of our D and a better player.

[NYCskinfan82]

Originally Posted by 12thMan

Also, Dallas and the Giants have lost some key faces. And Romo's future is still very much in the air.

Report: Romo can’t be tagged in 2014 | ProFootballTalk

You might want to read this.

[NYCskinfan82]

Originally Posted by RedskinRat

Because Fletcher is an integral part of our D and a better player.

Took the words out of my mouth.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by NC_Skins

I concur with this. I'm satisfied with what they are doing. The one thing I'm skeptical about is having Fletcher around at his high cap number. I mean, if the Bears weren't willing to pay Urlacher 3 million, than why in the **** are we paying Fletch 5+ mil. Hell, I'd rather have Urlacher at a cheaper cost.

Fletcher has a bit more left in the thank that Urlacher at this point. His left knee is shot. The Bears were probably glad he didn't take their offer.

[donofriose]

Urlacher is really not good at all anymore. But London will need to be replaced, his play has obviously declined. There are some potential upgrades in the draft. We will see.

[CultBrennan59]

As far as Urlacher and Fletcher talk. Let me make this as simple as possible for you. Fletcher has yet to miss a game. Urlacher misses many games every year now.