Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Redskins vs. Steelers Game Thread

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-23-2009, 12:13 AM   #421
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
Re: Redskins vs. Steelers Game Thread

I've grown to hate watching some other teams.. when I see Orton making clutch passes and all of these teams making solid catches/throws I wish that we had that
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 08-23-2009, 12:13 AM   #422
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Redskins vs. Steelers Game Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by tryfuhl View Post
Well no matter how you look you don't want to look at the stats page and see 1/7 with 10 yards, whether it's your fault or not.
1/7 is not the same as 5/35. It's an irrelevant sample size. When that's all you have, you pretty much have to trust your eyes--imperfect as that may be.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2009, 12:14 AM   #423
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
Re: Redskins vs. Steelers Game Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
1/7 is not the same as 5/35. It's an irrelevant sample size. When that's all you have, you pretty much have to trust your eyes--imperfect as that may be.
nay and 5/35 isn't 10/70 either you know

there were circumstances but what's the best he could've pulled from that.. 4/7 aka 57pct or so?

i guess he needs his reps.. and I think that zorn is messing up by not giving them to him
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2009, 12:16 AM   #424
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Redskins vs. Steelers Game Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by tryfuhl View Post
nay and 5/35 isn't 10/70 either you know

there were circumstances but what's the best he could've pulled from that.. 4/7 aka 57pct or so?
True.

By the end of the week 3 game, we'll have something substantial to say about Campbell's development. Even then it won't be much, but we'll be able to say "he looks better" or "he doesn't look any better".

Until then, his performance is more or less an expected constant, in my eyes at least.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2009, 12:17 AM   #425
DBUCHANON101
The Starter
 
DBUCHANON101's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,373
Re: Redskins vs. Steelers Game Thread

It burns to see other starting QB's tear it up and ours is sputtering along.. yes its preseason but still...
__________________
But there's booze in the blender. And soon it will render. That frozen concoction that helps me hang on.
DBUCHANON101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2009, 12:18 AM   #426
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Redskins vs. Steelers Game Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by tryfuhl View Post
nay and 5/35 isn't 10/70 either you know

there were circumstances but what's the best he could've pulled from that.. 4/7 aka 57pct or so?

i guess he needs his reps.. and I think that zorn is messing up by not giving them to him
I don't know if he needs reps, but we wasted reps by throwing two well-covered deep balls in a preseason game.

Given the penalties, the best he could have done was about 3/7 for 25-30 yards. The fact that he didn't execute perfectly on a play or two, plus a deep ball that wasn't perfectly thrown, doesn't bother me at all.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2009, 12:20 AM   #427
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
Re: Redskins vs. Steelers Game Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
True.

By the end of the week 3 game, we'll have something substantial to say about Campbell's development. Even then it won't be much, but we'll be able to say "he looks better" or "he doesn't look any better".

Until then, his performance is more or less an expected constant, in my eyes at least.
I'd like to see him for about a half in at least the last game.. if not the next 2
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2009, 12:20 AM   #428
stu_nna
Special Teams
 
stu_nna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Age: 47
Posts: 239
Re: Redskins vs. Steelers Game Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by GusFrerotte View Post
When does poise alone score TD's?
It doesnt i just didnt see bad throws, fumbles, sacks, and indecision. Not saying he was stellar just seemed calm
stu_nna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2009, 12:21 AM   #429
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Redskins vs. Steelers Game Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by DBUCHANON101 View Post
It burns to see other starting QB's tear it up and ours is sputtering along.. yes its preseason but still...
Why does it burn? What is being proven in one quarter of play?

Good story: last year in the first quarter of games, Tyler Thigpen was a better quarterback than Peyton Manning, who won the MVP. If they both got pulled after two drives every game, the only difference would have been contract numbers.

Next week, we'll get to see 10-15 passes from Campbell, which should help a little. Zorn apparently doesn't need to see him read a defense because half of his passes are one receiver designed plays. No idea what the point of that is in the context of a preseason game.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2009, 12:22 AM   #430
GusFrerotte
Registered User
 
GusFrerotte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
Re: Redskins vs. Steelers Game Thread

THing is JC should be given some comeptition to raise his game. Why is the guy untouchable? He is not a Manning brother, Roethlisberger, Brady, McNabb, etc. He is average at best and the winning percentage of our team reflects this. It was Collins that came in when JC was hurt, went undefeated and got us in the playoffs. It is debatable at best if JC could have done the same.
GusFrerotte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2009, 12:22 AM   #431
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
Re: Redskins vs. Steelers Game Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
I don't know if he needs reps, but we wasted reps by throwing two well-covered deep balls in a preseason game.

Given the penalties, the best he could have done was about 3/7 for 25-30 yards. The fact that he didn't execute perfectly on a play or two, plus a deep ball that wasn't perfectly thrown, doesn't bother me at all.
I liked the first play call... but yes it was well covered and jason campbell either by design or whatever didn't think about throwing anything BUT that ball, kind of hard to say what could have been, so we can only work with the reality

even if he went 6/7 on the next 7 we'd still be looking at 7/14, I don't know.. I need to see more chemistry between him and the receivers
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2009, 12:23 AM   #432
stu_nna
Special Teams
 
stu_nna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Age: 47
Posts: 239
Re: Redskins vs. Steelers Game Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by tryfuhl View Post
I liked the first play call... but yes it was well covered and jason campbell either by design or whatever didn't think about throwing anything BUT that ball, kind of hard to say what could have been, so we can only work with the reality

even if he went 6/7 on the next 7 we'd still be looking at 7/14, I don't know.. I need to see more chemistry between him and the receivers
It seemed that throw was decided at the moment of the snap.
stu_nna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2009, 12:24 AM   #433
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Redskins vs. Steelers Game Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by GusFrerotte View Post
THing is JC should be given some comeptition to raise his game. Why is the guy untouchable? He is not a Manning brother, Roethlisberger, Brady, McNabb, etc. He is average at best and the winning percentage of our team reflects this. It was Collins that came in when JC was hurt, went undefeated and got us in the playoffs. It is debatable at best if JC could have done the same.
He's untouchable because we have two guys who have never taken an NFL snap, and a 38 year old in a relatively foreign offense behind him.

We always had strong QB depth in the Ramsey days, but if we released all of our QBs tomorrow, only Campbell would be employed next week.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2009, 12:24 AM   #434
GusFrerotte
Registered User
 
GusFrerotte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
Re: Redskins vs. Steelers Game Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by stu_nna View Post
It doesnt i just didnt see bad throws, fumbles, sacks, and indecision. Not saying he was stellar just seemed calm
I understand that, but still being calm doesn't mean complete passes, first downs, or scores. I think Zorn needs to give JC a nice workout next game.
GusFrerotte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2009, 12:25 AM   #435
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
Re: Redskins vs. Steelers Game Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
He's untouchable because we have two guys who have never taken an NFL snap, and a 38 year old in a relatively foreign offense behind him.

We always had strong QB depth in the Ramsey days, but if we released all of our QBs tomorrow, only Campbell would be employed next week.
who do you see going for campbell at the moment? think he'd be a guaranteed starter?
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.17003 seconds with 10 queries