Parcells and T.O

5RINGS · 03-30-2006, 07:14 PM

teams have tried the three fast wr route before - worked for you guys in the eighties - but like any scheme there is a defense.

Our O line is better by default - couldn't possibly be worse...

jermus22 · 03-30-2006, 08:57 PM

I'm not worried about T.O. as long as we have Shawn Springs and Sean Taylor in our lineup. I remember replays of the way they handled him in the Eagles games. Taylor laid out Owens a few times and managed to shut him up pretty quick.

jermus22 · 03-30-2006, 08:59 PM

I agree that Dallas' offense could be better, but a lot depends on the o-line gelling and also T.O.'s behavior.

That Guy · 03-30-2006, 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 5RINGS

teams have tried the three fast wr route before - worked for you guys in the eighties - but like any scheme there is a defense.

Our O line is better by default - couldn't possibly be worse...

yeah, but you couldn't stop one fast WR last year.

5RINGS · 03-31-2006, 10:14 AM

<strong>That Guy</strong>

you are right. We couldn't stop one last year. But we had no pass rush either, Brunell had a week to heave those up. Hopefully we have a rush this year.

<strong>jermus22</strong>

If you put Springs on our fastest receiver - Glenn - and use Taylor to double with the other cb on TO, you have to cover Witten with who - Archuleta? Yeah your HB/TE Cooley did okay when we tried to cover him with a SS or an OLB. TO helps us set up that same defensive headache.

5RINGS · 03-31-2006, 10:14 AM

oops,

no HTML here...

If I only looked up and saw the bold symbol....

PSUSkinsFan21 · 03-31-2006, 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 5RINGS

If you put Springs on our fastest receiver - Glenn - and use Taylor to double with the other cb on TO, you have to cover Witten with who - Archuleta? Yeah your HB/TE Cooley did okay when we tried to cover him with a SS or an OLB. TO helps us set up that same defensive headache.

In TO's last 3 games against us, he's had 10 catches for 103 yards and 1 TD total.......in 3 games. I'm not worried about TO ever giving us a defenseive headache.

5RINGS · 03-31-2006, 10:27 AM

A good team with a smart coach with talent in the secondary could stop the Philly attack that was pass, pass, pass, pass to the rb, then pass, pass, pass.

TO will open the game up for Dallas' running game.

5RINGS · 03-31-2006, 10:29 AM

And when the S hesitates and peeks in to the backfield? One of our recievers will have gone by him.

Of course this only works if our O Line gives Bledsoe time. We'll see.

PSUSkinsFan21 · 03-31-2006, 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 5RINGS

A good team with a smart coach with talent in the secondary could stop the Philly attack that was pass, pass, pass, pass to the rb, then pass, pass, pass.

TO will open the game up for Dallas' running game.

Hmmm, that's interesting because in TO's last 3 games against Dallas (including the partial game in which he broke his leg), TO had 13 catches for 208 yards and 3 TDs.......so by implication......

I agree with you that Dallas's running game stands to benefit from TO being there......but against us I'm just not worried. If he ever got the better of us, I might be concerned......but we've consistently shut him down regardless of the offense he's playing for, even when all the other teams in the NFL got torched by him.

TheMalcolmConnection · 03-31-2006, 10:40 AM

Right and this was a team with a better overall offense running the show.

hesscl34 · 03-31-2006, 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skins1573

T.O in dallas, is not good for the skins, but then again look who they have for a QB, I hate dallas

Oh come on. It will make for a great game!! We beat TO last season and we'll beat him this season.. only this time it will be so much more fun because he is a Cowboy!! I can't wait for the game!

EXoffender · 03-31-2006, 10:59 AM

I'm laughing so hard right now.

hesscl34 · 03-31-2006, 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EXoffender

I'm laughing so hard right now.

What is so funny?

TheMalcolmConnection · 03-31-2006, 11:05 AM

TO in Dallas. While I will totally concede he will make them better, he will NOT make them a Super Bowl team, hence the name TEAM.

The surrounding members also have to be up to the task and obviously the running game is not.

03-30-2006, 07:14 PM	#31
5RINGS Closet Redskins Fan Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 495	Re: Parcells and T.O teams have tried the three fast wr route before - worked for you guys in the eighties - but like any scheme there is a defense. Our O line is better by default - couldn't possibly be worse... __________________ I am a complete and unabashed Romosexual.

03-30-2006, 08:57 PM	#32
jermus22 Special Teams Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Frankfort, KY Age: 43 Posts: 336	Re: Parcells and T.O I'm not worried about T.O. as long as we have Shawn Springs and Sean Taylor in our lineup. I remember replays of the way they handled him in the Eagles games. Taylor laid out Owens a few times and managed to shut him up pretty quick. __________________ Win it in the trenches.

03-30-2006, 08:59 PM	#33
jermus22 Special Teams Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Frankfort, KY Age: 43 Posts: 336	Re: Parcells and T.O I agree that Dallas' offense could be better, but a lot depends on the o-line gelling and also T.O.'s behavior. __________________ Win it in the trenches.

03-31-2006, 10:14 AM	#35
5RINGS Closet Redskins Fan Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 495	Re: Parcells and T.O <strong>That Guy</strong> you are right. We couldn't stop one last year. But we had no pass rush either, Brunell had a week to heave those up. Hopefully we have a rush this year. <strong>jermus22</strong> If you put Springs on our fastest receiver - Glenn - and use Taylor to double with the other cb on TO, you have to cover Witten with who - Archuleta? Yeah your HB/TE Cooley did okay when we tried to cover him with a SS or an OLB. TO helps us set up that same defensive headache. __________________ I am a complete and unabashed Romosexual.

03-31-2006, 10:14 AM	#36
5RINGS Closet Redskins Fan Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 495	Re: Parcells and T.O oops, no HTML here... If I only looked up and saw the bold symbol.... __________________ I am a complete and unabashed Romosexual.

03-31-2006, 10:27 AM	#38
5RINGS Closet Redskins Fan Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 495	Re: Parcells and T.O A good team with a smart coach with talent in the secondary could stop the Philly attack that was pass, pass, pass, pass to the rb, then pass, pass, pass. TO will open the game up for Dallas' running game. __________________ I am a complete and unabashed Romosexual.

03-31-2006, 10:29 AM	#39
5RINGS Closet Redskins Fan Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 495	Re: Parcells and T.O And when the S hesitates and peeks in to the backfield? One of our recievers will have gone by him. Of course this only works if our O Line gives Bledsoe time. We'll see. __________________ I am a complete and unabashed Romosexual.

03-31-2006, 10:40 AM	#41
TheMalcolmConnection I like big (_\|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Charlottesville, Virginia Age: 44 Posts: 19,264	Re: Parcells and T.O Right and this was a team with a better overall offense running the show. __________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.

03-31-2006, 10:59 AM	#43
EXoffender The Starter Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Norfolk, Va Posts: 1,046	Re: Parcells and T.O I'm laughing so hard right now.

03-31-2006, 11:05 AM	#45
TheMalcolmConnection I like big (_\|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Charlottesville, Virginia Age: 44 Posts: 19,264	Re: Parcells and T.O TO in Dallas. While I will totally concede he will make them better, he will NOT make them a Super Bowl team, hence the name TEAM. The surrounding members also have to be up to the task and obviously the running game is not. __________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.

Parcells and T.O

Locker Room Main Forum