|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
View Poll Results: The Redskins offseason plan for 2007 should be... | |||
Major changes in personnel and coaches, blow it all up | 3 | 4.62% | |
Moderate changes | 31 | 47.69% | |
Minimal changes | 28 | 43.08% | |
No changes at all | 3 | 4.62% | |
Voters: 65. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-23-2006, 11:07 PM | #31 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 344
|
Re: Offseason plan for 2007
Welcome to my world.
__________________
"Nobody in football should be called a genius. A genius is a guy like Norman Einstein."- Joe Theismann |
Advertisements |
10-23-2006, 11:11 PM | #32 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: all up in your business
Posts: 2,693
|
Re: Offseason plan for 2007
Moderate - as others said, a QB change is not minimal. I say do that, dump Archesuxa, and pick up some REAL help for the secondary and LBs. Yeah, that should do it.
|
10-23-2006, 11:31 PM | #33 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Offseason plan for 2007
Dump Archuleta and take a $10 million cap hit? No thanks. As for the LBs, who would you bench? Marshall, Washington, or Rocky (assuming he is slated to start next season)? No thanks. I would, however, like to see a #2, #3 corner though.
|
10-23-2006, 11:39 PM | #34 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: all up in your business
Posts: 2,693
|
Re: Offseason plan for 2007
Quote:
I never said bench any of our starting LBs - I said get them help. We have no depth right now, and relying on those three to start every down is asking a lot. Plus, McIntosh isn't starting this year, so that's a false option. Same for our secondary - I'd keep Springs/Rogers/Taylor, and replace AA with a SS starter that can actually, um, I don't know, cover? |
|
10-23-2006, 11:40 PM | #35 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 48
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: Offseason plan for 2007
I see 4 needs that we should take best available in the draft. I don't want to see any trading up or down. Use the picks that we have (how many is that? Two?).
O-line D-line Corner Linebacker I do not want any skill players through the draft or free agency we have plenty. The QB should be our FA focus. I don't mind if they get a FA corner, O or D lineman. The line is the corps of a unit whether it be offense or defense. I think that everyone would agree that we are weak on both fronts. Hopefully Pierson can come back and I would like them to hold onto Vincent. I think Vincent is a nice compliment to Taylor. Force Archuletta and Carter to earn playing time. Unfortunately neither can be cut but Bible thumper Brunell can. Nice knowing you. Thanks for ruining 2 out of your 3 seasons. |
10-24-2006, 03:00 AM | #36 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Offseason plan for 2007
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
10-24-2006, 03:09 AM | #37 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
|
Re: Offseason plan for 2007
Quote:
vincent and prioleau (next year) can be those vet min coverage guys at SS. i think starting DT, CB, 6th starter for the OL, starting quality LB (lemar is 30, rocky isn't a sure thing right now), kicker/punter are our needs, in that order... a real pass rushing DE would be nice, but getting an immediate impact player there from the draft is extremely hard, and we've already got 3 starting DEs with a reserve, even though they're all average at best. and to answer the other question, we have a 1, 5, 6, 7... if denver finishes close to us record wise, there could be a pick swap and we'd have a lower 1st and a 3rd i believe. i think there's a top 10 CB, but not a top 5 one. DE is relatively deep this year though, even though the hit percentage on 1st round DEs is only about 50% (and that's 3 years out, not immediate impact). speed cbs don't look very plentiful right now, but that'll change once the combine rolls around and they start practicing 40s :P. |
|
|
|