|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-22-2006, 01:36 PM | #31 |
Propane and propane accessories
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Age: 55
Posts: 4,719
|
Re: Do We Have A Legit Shot At Nate Clements?
Good post, Gmanc. I agree here. Clements isn't gonna fix it, and it feels like another quick fix, big splash move. We need D-line help, and we need to target guys like Marcus Washington--on the rise, but not there yet, etc. Of course, everyone is looking for those guys, but when we did that, it worked.
And we need to re-sign guys, not just to keep continuity, but to show the players we're for real when we say "core redskin." I think the loss of AP, Smoot, and Clark hurt the D and shook their faith in this "core player" idea. That didn't happen on the offensive side of the ball--wonder if Williams and co made those decisions, and Gibbs stayed out of the way there? Is there anyone we miss on offense? (More and more, I am growing skeptical of Williams--maybe this is just an easy way to avoid knocking on St. Joe, but whatever...)
__________________
Hail from Houston! |
Advertisements |
11-22-2006, 01:39 PM | #32 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Woodley Park, Washington DC
Age: 40
Posts: 937
|
Re: Do We Have A Legit Shot At Nate Clements?
Stop with this rogers is gonna improve crap, I don't like the guys attitude, it's not a hardworking improvement type attitude, I bet we could get something good for him right now. He's the only guy on the team I truly dont like as a player and person.
__________________
Dan Snyder is a Cancer, Joe Gibbs is the Cure |
11-22-2006, 01:45 PM | #33 | |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: Do We Have A Legit Shot At Nate Clements?
Quote:
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
|
11-22-2006, 01:49 PM | #34 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Woodley Park, Washington DC
Age: 40
Posts: 937
|
Re: Do We Have A Legit Shot At Nate Clements?
Quote:
__________________
Dan Snyder is a Cancer, Joe Gibbs is the Cure |
|
11-22-2006, 02:24 PM | #35 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Do We Have A Legit Shot At Nate Clements?
The more I think about it, the less I like the idea of signing Clements. He's going to command a huge contract. He's also going to be 28; so he's got about 2 years before he starts declining.
Yeah we need help in the secondary, but I'm not going to give up on Rogers just yet and I'm praying that we can find a less expensive alternative on the market or in the draft. |
11-22-2006, 02:28 PM | #36 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Woodley Park, Washington DC
Age: 40
Posts: 937
|
Re: Do We Have A Legit Shot At Nate Clements?
Yeah, I think our secondary needs should be adressed in the draft, with our second pick possibly. Our first pick should be a MLB, posluzsny, and our later picks should be DTs, while free agency should be used for a DE, but we need better talent evaluation for the DE position before we make a move on that. I just feel that quality DE's are so so hard to find in the draft, many of them are busts.
__________________
Dan Snyder is a Cancer, Joe Gibbs is the Cure |
11-22-2006, 04:28 PM | #37 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
|
Re: Do We Have A Legit Shot At Nate Clements?
I prefer us not think about FA's already. For much of this season we have critisized the FO for it's free agent aqusitions, and with the season just a little over half gone, we're back to the well again. When are we ever going to learn? It certainly wouldn't suprise me if Nate Clements is reading here, he can't wait for Snyder One to land so he can make his haul.
For once I want to see the FO go into the offseason with the mindset, we're going to seek players who will play to get paid, as opposed to those whom you have to pay to play. Our #1 priority should be to improve the D-line first, we have witnessed first hand for the last few years that it's our major weakness. I'm not a GM, or in any way a football expert, but if I were going to start building a team tomorrow, I would start with my offensive, and defensive lines. Every team I can think of that has ever been successful on a sustained basis had both. I repeat, the lines are the heart and soul of your football team, once in order, everything else will take shape.
__________________
A revolution is coming and it will be televised. |
11-22-2006, 05:12 PM | #38 |
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: round the way
Age: 41
Posts: 2,211
|
Re: Do We Have A Legit Shot At Nate Clements?
exactly! you dont need the big names like AA. do you remember when our defense was best? it was when we had no name players like a Antonio pierce and others. we just need some players with level heads and want to play football rather than count there money.
__________________
SOMEBODY PINCH ME |
11-22-2006, 05:49 PM | #39 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northern,Va.
Posts: 2,706
|
Re: Do We Have A Legit Shot At Nate Clements?
Quote:
|
|
11-22-2006, 06:53 PM | #40 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 60
Posts: 3,419
|
Re: Do We Have A Legit Shot At Nate Clements?
Quote:
|
|
11-22-2006, 06:57 PM | #41 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Age: 51
Posts: 410
|
Re: Do We Have A Legit Shot At Nate Clements?
Quote:
I haven't been a member of this post long, but this is one of the best posts I've seen here. The problem is primarily with the front seven. The secondary has looked horrible b/c they are getting no help up front. Throwing Rogers in the trashcan is bit impatient at this point. I think we've been spoiled by the CB talent that's been here in recent years. Give the guy some time and let him learn. If we sign Clements its going to be for too much and the money can be better spent elsewhere. The skins need depth everywhere not just for game day, but during practice as well. If you practice against cream puffs all week, then guess how you're going to play on Sundays.
__________________
"At night there is no such thing as an ugly woman." Ovid (43 B.C.- A.D. 17) |
|
11-23-2006, 01:30 AM | #42 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Venice Beach, CA
Age: 52
Posts: 345
|
Re: Do We Have A Legit Shot At Nate Clements?
You act like it's not a foregone conclusion. OF COURSE we're getting Nate Clements. Gas up the jet and make sure it's stocked with all the Diet Coke you can drink, the Danny's going to upstate New York!!
|
11-23-2006, 02:50 AM | #43 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Nashville,TN
Age: 51
Posts: 474
|
Re: Do We Have A Legit Shot At Nate Clements?
Maybe they are trying to have great corners to make up for the lack of effectiveness of the D-line. I dunno, just a thought.
__________________
BEWARE THE MIDDLE............LaRON LANDRY IS LURKING! |
11-23-2006, 03:04 AM | #44 |
No new threads for you
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: north dakota
Posts: 121
|
Re: Do We Have A Legit Shot At Nate Clements?
ok sign him, so he can be a huge bust for us - we gotta work through the draft in my humble opinion.
|
11-23-2006, 05:31 AM | #45 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 48
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: Do We Have A Legit Shot At Nate Clements?
Quote:
I would rather build up the line this year. We have tried fixing the D by signing and drafting corners and it hasn't worked this year. If they used every draft pick the O and defensive lines by picking the best available, I would be thrilled. |
|
|
|