12-25-2006, 01:55 PM | #31 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 55
|
Re: Portis over Betts no brainer
On the bright side, the offense as a whole played well and we will receiving the 7th pick in the April Draft at worst. Start scouting them CBs... Merry Christmas!
__________________
"If I'm the fourth receiver, then that tells you how good we're going to be" - David Patten HE LIED |
Advertisements |
12-25-2006, 01:56 PM | #32 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 55
|
Re: Portis over Betts no brainer
P.S. I know that my signature sucks..
__________________
"If I'm the fourth receiver, then that tells you how good we're going to be" - David Patten HE LIED |
12-25-2006, 02:02 PM | #33 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Jersey
Age: 42
Posts: 5,454
|
Re: Portis over Betts no brainer
My signature also doesnt really seem to fit anymore... I dont have the heart to change it though.
__________________
"I'm used to winning, coming from the University of Miami. " Clinton Portis |
12-25-2006, 02:14 PM | #34 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 40
Posts: 3,109
|
Re: Portis over Betts no brainer
Quote:
|
|
12-25-2006, 02:33 PM | #35 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: chesapeake,va.
Posts: 2,160
|
Re: Portis over Betts no brainer
Quote:
if we go after nate clements in free agency then we should go after a d-lineman with our first pick **preferably a pass rushing d-lineman as appossed to a run stopping d-lineman.
__________________
Hail to Allen/Shanahan .... bring in some baby hogs and load up on diesel fuel !!! (budw38) |
|
12-25-2006, 02:59 PM | #36 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 55
|
Re: Portis over Betts no brainer
I like the idea of moving Springs to FS with Taylor moving to SS (where he belongs), rotating in Vincent (if he is still around) and Prioleau at safety, while sarting Clements (if we get him) and Carlos on the outsides with Wright at the nickel. Springs would also be able to help at corner and Prioleau and Vincent can play a little corner as well in dime of quarter packages. Bye AA...
__________________
"If I'm the fourth receiver, then that tells you how good we're going to be" - David Patten HE LIED |
12-25-2006, 03:34 PM | #37 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Portis over Betts no brainer
Quote:
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
|
12-25-2006, 07:21 PM | #38 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 48
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: Portis over Betts no brainer
Quote:
Taylor gave up 3 tds? The last time I checked, when a runningback gets the ball, you expect a lineman or linebacker to make the tackle. To blame a safety on a run or screen doesn't make sense to me. He blew the tackles, no doubt. But when a back has the ball the safety shouldn't even be in the play. |
|
12-25-2006, 07:41 PM | #39 |
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The ATX (formerly Balmer)
Posts: 1,125
|
Re: Portis over Betts no brainer
I was talking about Wilkins missing a 40 yarder. And he hasn't been automatic from 40-49 (who is these days?), but he hasn't missed from 30-39, so a 41 yarder isn't exactly scary hard for that guy.
|
12-25-2006, 07:42 PM | #40 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The ATX (formerly Balmer)
Posts: 1,125
|
Re: Portis over Betts no brainer
Quote:
|
|
12-25-2006, 09:09 PM | #41 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Portis over Betts no brainer
Quote:
Unlike the defense, Betts had a solid game up until the end of the game. However, you can't simply ignore his fumble at a very, very crucial point in the game. |
|
12-26-2006, 10:39 AM | #42 |
Assistant Regional Mod
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Carbondale CO
Age: 44
Posts: 2,958
|
Re: Portis over Betts no brainer
The fumble sucked. It didn't lose us the game, but he did blow a chance to win it. The D, however, was playing like crazy in the beginning. Losing Springs really hurt us. I know we gave up a lot of yards and points, but we were at least getting a little bit of pass rush on, which was nice to see.
Not having 2 of your best players on D at 2 different levels will really hurt you. I like seeng McIntosh in there, but definately not at the expense of Marcus Washington, our best LB by far... and Springs was having a great game until he got hurt... Our Secondary is weak beyond springs. Sean Taylor is basically the only guy left out there. I've pretty much given up on Carlos Rogers, and I wouldn't even keep kenny wright on the f'ing practice squad. Ade Jimoh is a Special Teamer, but he played his ass off in there... they were just too much for us to stop. They do have a hell of an offense when they're clicking, and our D is hurt and having a really bad year. Portis is a superstar runningback for a reason.. betts never will be for the same reason... although he's been an amazing backup, I'll give him that...
__________________
I am the brute squad. |
12-26-2006, 11:36 AM | #43 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 60
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: Portis over Betts no brainer
Three things that I saw which cost use the win.1) Betts fumble did cost us the game in the long run but it was not the only reason we lost and it should not all be hung on him. 2) After our TD drive in the beging of the 3rd Qtr. our O struggled to stay on the field and gave the ball back after quick series. 3) Our D was winded in the second half and never had a break in the 2nd half and by the end of the game almost gave 600 yards. My point is that we could blame just about any unit for the loss not just one player who Yes, ultimately made the final mistake that cost us the win.
|
12-26-2006, 11:40 AM | #44 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 60
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: Portis over Betts no brainer
Quote:
|
|
12-26-2006, 12:02 PM | #45 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,281
|
Re: Portis over Betts no brainer
Quote:
|
|
|
|