![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: Jason Campbell's development
My bet is ARE is our #2 this year unless Lloyd can prove himself and get out of the doghouse.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 721
|
Re: Jason Campbell's development
Quote:
I guess so. I keep harping on Brandon Llyod because he did have the worst stats in the NFL for a #2 but he sure made a lot of money and cost a lot of picks. I know a lot of people on the board say that it was the qb who could not get him the ball and that he was getting open and just running the routes that coaches asked him to run. Well this year there are no more excuses for Llyod. Jason Campbell's arm strength from what I saw and lots of other Skins fans saw is pretty darn good. Add to that the offensive line is 4/5 intact and one of the better lines in the NFL with 2 good rushers, a star WR in Moss and a good TE in Cooley - I just don't see if he has another bad year how anyone can still defend him and still think he should be part of the team. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: Jason Campbell's development
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Newport News,Virginia
Age: 61
Posts: 4,495
|
Re: Jason Campbell's development
Quote:
I do hope I'm wrong, but I agree if he doesn't have a heck of a season he's outta DC. I also think he was very close this year to being chopped, I think it came down to Lloyd or Arch.
__________________
"There's no greater feeling than moving a man from Point A to Point B, against his will." #68 THANKS COACH GIBBS FOR EVERYTHING! YOUR THE MAN AND ALWAYS WILL BE! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: Jason Campbell's development
I agree it was probably a choice of AA or Lloyd. I guess the coaches thought Lloyd was the lesser of the two evils.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Jason Campbell's development
Quote:
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. MD
Age: 47
Posts: 1,319
|
Re: Jason Campbell's development
Quote:
I saw Lloyd get decent seperation on several occasions. The problem is he wasn't the first option on most plays. Brunell's reads 90% of the time were first option, then checkdown. Campbell's reads were the same way in his early starts because of inexperience. With Campbell being more comfortable in the offense and having gained some experience, I think B. Lloyd with have a pretty solid season this year. He's also a very good blocker, which is rare in wide receivers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,591
|
Re: Jason Campbell's development
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Trinity, NC
Age: 54
Posts: 1,444
|
Re: Jason Campbell's development
Count me among the geeked.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 331
|
Re: Jason Campbell's development
I wanted to point out a couple things:
Has anyone seen the parallel between the running backs on the 'Skins and what JC had at Auburn? I mean, one of the knocks on Campbell coming out of college is that he might have benefited from the RB duo he played with there. Well, now he's got that at the pro level and I think it's a good thing. He knows how to operate and flourish in a two back system. Also, I think JC is the prototype caretaker QB, but in a good way. I think he could excel at doing a lot of things well, taking care of the ball, making some plays with his feet, and distributing the ball and keeping a lot of players interested/happy. Tom Brady is the uber caretaker IMO. I think JC has the potential to really be a distributer/enabler who can put his teammates in position to win games for us. He's not a world beater type, but I think that can play into our hands in a big way if he really does make strides and develop. On a side note, does anyone actually think someone would come out after a couple of offseason workouts and OTA's and say Campbell looks bad, that he has regressed, and that he is really slacking off? I mean, we really do have to wait and see how this plays out on the field. He was coming into the park 12 hours a week and he is the starting quarterback of the wealthiest franchise in a multi billion dollar industry. I am sorry, but I don't say "Wow, he really is working his tail off" when you tell me he's working a 12 hour week. That's barely part time where I come from (Washington, DC). However, I think it is best that he worked with Saunders and got really caught up before throwing on his own with Santana and whoever else. Now, he is really in a position to get everyone on the same page if they do go ahead with that plan to work out together after mini camp. With all that said, I think this could be the year that our offense finally turns the corner. While everyone is so concerned about the D, you have to remember that the defense actually has a pedigree of recent success. The offense has been the enigma that we haven't been able to solve for a long time, and I think it's obvious that JC is the reason this thing will turn around if it does. He doesn't have to be superman, he just needs stay poised, manage the offense, and not be predictable enough to gameplan easily. I think he can do that. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Yorktown, Va
Age: 57
Posts: 1,587
|
Re: Jason Campbell's development
Quote:
Im hoping for big things to happen this year.
__________________
Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts. A. Einstien |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,591
|
Re: Jason Campbell's development
Quote:
But several guys have said that JC looks much better in his drops and is getting rid of the ball quicker. This is the stuff he most likely works on w/ AS and Lazor during the week. But none of it's going to matter unless he takes in to the field come Sept. I think he will. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Richmond VA
Age: 40
Posts: 2,584
|
Re: Jason Campbell's development
Lloyd is DEF the lesser of 2 evils. Screw AA and B-Lloyd but Llyod is young and can improve. AA is old and screwed. Not a hard decsion IMO. Llyod better step up or , I agree, He's out.
__________________
The redskins pocket is like my love life.....nonexistent and disappointing. -OnceWeWereKings |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 331
|
Re: Jason Campbell's development
It might be time to change the name of this thread to "Re: Brandon Lloyd's Development".
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Richmond VA
Age: 40
Posts: 2,584
|
Re: Jason Campbell's development
Quote:
heheeh agreed
__________________
The redskins pocket is like my love life.....nonexistent and disappointing. -OnceWeWereKings |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|