![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?
Shockey is very overrated because of his mouth and because of where he played in college.
I like Crumpler, the guy is a load and can move. Witten is very good, perhaps a bit overrated because of the star on his helmet but he's a player regardless. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
|
Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?
Honestly, I wouldn't put Gates over Cooley as the best OVERALL TE. Gates is a great receiver, but not the best blocker or after the catch.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 116
|
Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?
Gonzo, Gates, Crumpler and Cooley should go to the pro bowl every year! There is no doubt in my mind.
On another note, this just goes to show why we shouldn't trade away our second round draft picks. After all thats where we got Betts and Cooley! To great players for us. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?
Quote:
http://www.thewarpath.net/redskins-draft.htm But yeah, point taken about trading picks away. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 116
|
Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?
Your right, my mistake. I just hope that Loyd plays well to open him and Moss up some more. If not, he needs to get benched for ARE who showed signs toward the end of last year!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Newport News,Virginia
Age: 61
Posts: 4,495
|
Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?
Cooley is the man. And yes he's a blocking ,catching,running and of course hard hitting TE, TD machine.
He will get his due respect this year at contract time.
__________________
"There's no greater feeling than moving a man from Point A to Point B, against his will." #68 THANKS COACH GIBBS FOR EVERYTHING! YOUR THE MAN AND ALWAYS WILL BE! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 116
|
Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?
That is normal negotiation between players and team. Teams always try and low ball players at first. In the long run, the skins know they can't afford to let Cooley walk. He is too talented, too young, and just too much of a CORE REDSKINS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?
You have Chris Cooley, as a golden plated circle peg, and a square hole that is the TE position. While Al Saunders was able to squeeze Cooley into that square hole with minimal effort, he wore some of that gold plated awesomeness off in the process.
In all seriousness, I think this article is just pointing out that if you needed a historical absolute prototype for the perfect HB, look no farther than 47. I don't think he's saying Cooley is being used as an H.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Newport News,Virginia
Age: 61
Posts: 4,495
|
Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?
Quote:
Cooley in this system is a textbook TE.
__________________
"There's no greater feeling than moving a man from Point A to Point B, against his will." #68 THANKS COACH GIBBS FOR EVERYTHING! YOUR THE MAN AND ALWAYS WILL BE! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?
He's a freaking TE, end of story.
Where's the grumpy version of Schneed when you need him? |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Most Interesting Man in the World
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 39
Posts: 8,606
|
Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?
Yeah seriously JDALY, you are wrong. Get over it. He isn't a H-back anymore. You are wrong. Life sucks, get use to it.
__________________
Vacancy |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 116
|
Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?
How much do you think cooley is going to demand when he hits the market. Let say we wrap him up with a 5 year contract.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?
I would not be at all surprised to see him get a 6 year deal worth $35M with a $13M signing bonus. That's a hell of a lot of money for a TE, but it's a crazy market right now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,674
|
Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?
Quote:
Or franchise him for almost $5 million
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
You did WHAT?!?
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 37
Posts: 14,189
|
Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?
i would pay him that too
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|