05-30-2007, 05:48 PM | #31 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2006
Age: 45
Posts: 271
|
Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?
Quote:
Just b/c the skins want to pay him like an average TE, does that have to make him one? What other points of reference would they have to go off of if they wanted to pay him like an H-back? |
|
Advertisements |
05-30-2007, 06:27 PM | #32 |
Special Teams
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 116
|
Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?
That is normal negotiation between players and team. Teams always try and low ball players at first. In the long run, the skins know they can't afford to let Cooley walk. He is too talented, too young, and just too much of a CORE REDSKINS.
|
05-30-2007, 06:32 PM | #33 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?
You have Chris Cooley, as a golden plated circle peg, and a square hole that is the TE position. While Al Saunders was able to squeeze Cooley into that square hole with minimal effort, he wore some of that gold plated awesomeness off in the process.
In all seriousness, I think this article is just pointing out that if you needed a historical absolute prototype for the perfect HB, look no farther than 47. I don't think he's saying Cooley is being used as an H.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
05-30-2007, 06:40 PM | #34 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Newport News,Virginia
Age: 60
Posts: 4,495
|
Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?
Quote:
Cooley in this system is a textbook TE.
__________________
"There's no greater feeling than moving a man from Point A to Point B, against his will." #68 THANKS COACH GIBBS FOR EVERYTHING! YOUR THE MAN AND ALWAYS WILL BE! |
|
05-30-2007, 07:11 PM | #35 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
|
Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?
Maybe Cooley could be best described as a hybrid, or "slash" a rare combimation of HB/FB/TE. He has served in various capacities since being with the team, to label him as one or the other would be a slight to his true skills.
__________________
A revolution is coming and it will be televised. |
05-30-2007, 07:44 PM | #36 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,569
|
Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?
He's a freaking TE, end of story.
Where's the grumpy version of Schneed when you need him? |
05-30-2007, 09:03 PM | #37 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,674
|
Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?
Quote:
And I don't know why people are saying Cooley is a H-Back and not a Tight End. He says he's a TE and so do the coaches. Nobody ever called Tony Gonzalez a H-Back even though he was used the same way as Cooley in the same system.
__________________
|
|
05-30-2007, 10:25 PM | #38 | |
You did WHAT?!?
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 35
Posts: 14,169
|
Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?
Quote:
He is a tight end and i am glad he finally became one
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is. |
|
05-30-2007, 10:49 PM | #39 |
Special Teams
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 116
|
Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?
How much do you think cooley is going to demand when he hits the market. Let say we wrap him up with a 5 year contract.
|
05-30-2007, 11:30 PM | #40 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Manassas
Age: 53
Posts: 3,048
|
Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?
He is a unique player. He has the size of a tight end, the route running and hands of a wide-receiver, and he runs like John Riggins. I do think that his role changed last year,though. He spent much less time around the line of scrimmage. I think they should use him in as many ways as they can.
__________________
This Monkey's Gone to Heaven |
05-30-2007, 11:43 PM | #41 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?
I would not be at all surprised to see him get a 6 year deal worth $35M with a $13M signing bonus. That's a hell of a lot of money for a TE, but it's a crazy market right now.
|
05-31-2007, 12:08 AM | #42 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,674
|
Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?
Quote:
Or franchise him for almost $5 million
__________________
|
|
05-31-2007, 12:54 AM | #43 | |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 61
|
Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?
Quote:
Given his unique skills and the booming contracts, is it reasonable to expect Cooley to sign a new record contract for a TE? How much would this be? and would the Redskins pay it?
__________________
Even from the other side of the world, i still HAIL! |
|
05-31-2007, 01:07 AM | #44 |
Most Interesting Man in the World
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 8,606
|
Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?
Yeah seriously JDALY, you are wrong. Get over it. He isn't a H-back anymore. You are wrong. Life sucks, get use to it.
__________________
Vacancy |
05-31-2007, 09:54 AM | #45 |
You did WHAT?!?
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 35
Posts: 14,169
|
Re: Is Cooley Still Considered an H-Back?
i would pay him that too
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is. |
|
|