Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Are We Better Off Without Moss?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-13-2007, 12:46 PM   #31
BDBohnzie
Playmaker
 
BDBohnzie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Frederick, MD
Age: 45
Posts: 4,628
Re: Are We Better Off Without Moss?

Moss is having an off year, that's for sure. The WR corps suffers when it's #1 WR is having a bad year, and I think that is the case for the Skins. We are not better off without Moss, however, I think Moss to this point has been misused.

Gibbs 1.0 had the posse. 2 guys that could stretch the field (Clark, Sanders) and one stoic guy who was the possession receiver, the go to guy when you needed that first down (Monk). Gibbs 2.0 hasn't had the stoic possession receiver. They have the 2 guys who can stretch the field (Moss, ARE), but do not have the possession guy. Moss has been playing the possession role, and I think he's cracking under the pressure a bit this year. The drops and injuries are just getting to him to the point where it's affecting his gameplay.

Thrash stepped up huge this past Sunday, and unfortunately a big special teamer is lost now. But, he showed that this team can move the ball down the field in chunks (2 31 yard receptions)

I think the guy the Skins need to look to in the next few weeks is Keenan McCardell. He is the guy that can fill the possession role quite nicely. It will also allow Moss to go back to the role of field stretcher, getting open behind the secondary.

But with injuries to Thrash and Moss, there is another guy who will be fighting for his career, that can step up, as this is a good a time as any, and that's Brandon Lloyd. And while he's seen a poison, this is a great chance to show potential and play down all the talk and whispers that have been going on.

It'll most likely be ARE, McCardell and Lloyd as your 3 receivers this weekend against the Cowboys, and quite honestly, the Redskins could be worse off. However, these 3 guys need to step it up and provide Campbell with huge targets to hit.
__________________
Bad Things man, I mean bad things...

“WE TOOK HIM IN THE SIXTH ROUND SO WE'RE NOT SMART EITHER.” - Shanny on what the Skins saw in Alfred Morris
BDBohnzie is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 11-13-2007, 12:55 PM   #32
DynamiteRave
Living Legend
 
DynamiteRave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Washington DC
Age: 38
Posts: 16,867
Re: Are We Better Off Without Moss?

I don't see a thing of it as being better without him but more as a note of saying, we don't necessarily need him to have a solid (*crosses fingers*) receiving core. It seems as if as long as we spread it around and give everyone amply opportunity, along with a pass with good touch, that they'll get it done.

Moss is still #1 and we still need him.
__________________
Establishment, establishment, you always know what's best.

I've been a part of this message board for 17 years. Damn I'm old.
DynamiteRave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2007, 12:56 PM   #33
FRPLG
MVP
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
Re: Are We Better Off Without Moss?

Quote:
Originally Posted by #56fanatic View Post
LOL!! Call me crazy Matty but I still have a hard time thinking the kid can't catch the damn ball. If he isn't in the game he cant catch it, plus if he is getting one ball thrown to him every game, and that ball he get thrown to him is 5 yards over thrown, and he makes an all out effor diving and just goes of the tips, I dont see him making those catches. I have seen this guy play, he can play. he needs to be on the field when they go 3 or 4 wr.

Hell, McCardell caught some balls when they went 3 or 4 wide, even a damn TD. Lloyd can play, he just needs some PT and some balls thrown his way.

I did drink all day and all night yesterday, am I still feeling it??
BL was on the field plenty and did squat. The guy simply doesn't get open for some reason and that has granted him zero confidence from JC. If your QB has no confidence in you then your chances are pretty slim. At this point the only way this works out well for him is if our WRs get totally decimated and BL is the only one left. Then maybe JC would go to him more and they could build some confidence.
FRPLG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2007, 12:59 PM   #34
FRPLG
MVP
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
Re: Are We Better Off Without Moss?

Actually I know why he doesn't get open. Per JLC he doesn't undestand the scheme and has refused to learn more than one of the WR positions. Our offense requires execution from the WRS since they have to make correct reads and then adjust pre-snap. It means you have to understand the scheme and know what to do in any situation. You don't notice a lot of confusion amongst the other WRs so it can't be that hard. But BL has struggled and/or refused to figure out what the hell he is supposed to do.

He can bend over and kick his own ass out the door as far as I am concerned at this point.
FRPLG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2007, 02:09 PM   #35
RMSkins
The Starter
 
RMSkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 36
Posts: 1,066
Re: Are We Better Off Without Moss?

Although in recent weeks our offense has been better without Moss. I think that he is definitely our best receiver when healthy, and even if he isn't healthy the opposing defense still has to account for him with double teams and roll coverage because they know what he is capable of especially the Cowboys. In the end I think the offense is better off with Moss in the lineup. On another note I would like to Reche Caldwell get a shot to see what he can do.
RMSkins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2007, 02:17 PM   #36
firstdown
Living Legend
 
firstdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 60
Posts: 15,817
Re: Are We Better Off Without Moss?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Essentially the point I was trying to make.
Well if the case is that JC has a tendency to stare down Moss and not view the field when he is in the game the issue is JC not Moss. He needs to learn to view the field at all times.
firstdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2007, 02:35 PM   #37
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,281
Re: Are We Better Off Without Moss?

Quote:
Originally Posted by FRPLG View Post
Actually I know why he doesn't get open. Per JLC he doesn't undestand the scheme and has refused to learn more than one of the WR positions. Our offense requires execution from the WRS since they have to make correct reads and then adjust pre-snap. It means you have to understand the scheme and know what to do in any situation. You don't notice a lot of confusion amongst the other WRs so it can't be that hard. But BL has struggled and/or refused to figure out what the hell he is supposed to do.

He can bend over and kick his own ass out the door as far as I am concerned at this point.
I remember Sanders saying if you can count to 1-9 then you can play wr in his offense. It's easy for the WR's. Lloyd just sucks and needs to get cut.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2007, 02:48 PM   #38
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,281
Re: Are We Better Off Without Moss?

Quote:
Originally Posted by memphisskin View Post
Injuries have derailed him this year, to start the year off him and Campbell were connecting on those deep balls, remember the 49 yard gem against the Giants? We knew before we traded for him, or at least we should have known, that he is a bit injury prone. But when healthy he is definitely a #1 WR, or have we forgotten he did make the Pro Bowl a couple years back?

I'm confused, how is Thrash's good game a black mark on Moss? That's like Bett's production last year reflecting poorly on Portis, and neither one make sense to me. These are good things, if anything when Moss gets healthy that means Thrash as the #3 wideout makes our offense even better, or am I missing the point?
A couple years back doesn't do anything for us now. It's what have you done for me lately? And lately all I've seem from Moss is drops, fumbles and injuries.

When Moss came here he wouldn't do anything until he got a new deal. The queston is did he deserve one? Maybe, maybe not. But he got a new deal and had a great year in 05. But it's 07 and it's time to produce like 05, or take a pay cut or we need to move in another direction.

All of our wr's are well paid and yet as far as production goes they are terrible, with Lloyd being the main culprit. IMO we need to bring in a true #1 wr that is 6'4 or 6'5 and can jump and is tough to deal with inside the red zone. We just don't have anyone that is physically imposing that puts strain on the DB's. We need someone that draws safties to one side of the field. Someone like a Plaxico Burress type to go along with all the little guys we have. IMO that should be our #1 off season priority.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2007, 03:02 PM   #39
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
Re: Are We Better Off Without Moss?

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
A couple years back doesn't do anything for us now. It's what have you done for me lately? And lately all I've seem from Moss is drops, fumbles and injuries.

When Moss came here he wouldn't do anything until he got a new deal. The queston is did he deserve one? Maybe, maybe not. But he got a new deal and had a great year in 05. But it's 07 and it's time to produce like 05, or take a pay cut or we need to move in another direction.

All of our wr's are well paid and yet as far as production goes they are terrible, with Lloyd being the main culprit. IMO we need to bring in a true #1 wr that is 6'4 or 6'5 and can jump and is tough to deal with inside the red zone. We just don't have anyone that is physically imposing that puts strain on the DB's. We need someone that draws safties to one side of the field. Someone like a Plaxico Burress type to go along with all the little guys we have. IMO that should be our #1 off season priority.
I really have to agree here. Even though I'm a big fan of Moss, the fact that he's been injured the better part of this season and last isn't good. As I said earlier I really wouldn't be surprised if we go a different direction in the offseason and try to unload him. We need someone who can stay in the lineup and be productive.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2007, 03:05 PM   #40
NinjaLink
Special Teams
 
NinjaLink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 123
Re: Are We Better Off Without Moss?

We are not better without Santana Moss. He is having a bad season because he is slowed by injuries. When Moss is 100%, he is a very dominant receiver when he catches the ball.
NinjaLink is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2007, 03:10 PM   #41
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Are We Better Off Without Moss?

It depends.

In the short term, we are better without Santana. However, in the long term he is still our most talented weapon and we will need him healthy to reach offensive dominance.

Since we are so far from offensive dominance, we really can't do a whole lot with him at this point.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2007, 04:13 PM   #42
hail_2_da_skins
Impact Rookie
 
hail_2_da_skins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Age: 68
Posts: 868
Re: Are We Better Off Without Moss?

NO! The Redskins need Santana Moss. He is the biggest threat the Redskins have. He can take a simple slant route and take it all the way. He has been hampered by injuries and when he has played, the timing with Jason Campbell has been off. I think that has a lot to do with Moss not being at full speed. Moss has always shown the ability to run under the deep pass. Campbell has put a few out there and Moss is physically incapable of turning on that second gear and running underneath the ball.

I would like to see the Redskins come out and attack the Cowboys from the beginning of the game and not wait until they get behind. In the three wide receiver set, if healthy, I would like to see Moss and Randle El as the wideouts and Keenan McCardell as the possession receiver. In the four wide receiver set, I would like to see Moss and Randle El as the wideouts and Keenan McCardell and James Thrash in the slots.
__________________
"HAIL TO THE SKINS"
hail_2_da_skins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2007, 05:09 PM   #43
LaRon + Sean = Hell 4 U
No new threads for you
 
LaRon + Sean = Hell 4 U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Moneytown
Posts: 127
Re: Are We Better Off Without Moss?

He is still our only deep threat wideout.
LaRon + Sean = Hell 4 U is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2007, 05:40 PM   #44
firstdown
Living Legend
 
firstdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 60
Posts: 15,817
Re: Are We Better Off Without Moss?

The title of this thread is wrong and does not keep with the theme of the week mods change to:
Its Time For Moss To Step Down
firstdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 5.62631 seconds with 10 queries