|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
View Poll Results: If Gibbs Doesn't Return, Who Should Be the Head Coach? | |||
Bill Cowher | 60 | 30.00% | |
Russ Grimm | 45 | 22.50% | |
Al Saunders | 9 | 4.50% | |
Gregg Williams | 68 | 34.00% | |
Other (tell us who) | 18 | 9.00% | |
Voters: 200. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-02-2007, 09:34 PM | #31 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 60
Posts: 3,419
|
Re: If Not Joe, Then Who?
I had never thought of Singletary, but he's universally respected. I do want to see Gregg Williams get his shot here. He remained loyal to Gibbs when he could have left for a head coaching job after his first year here.
|
Advertisements |
12-02-2007, 09:49 PM | #32 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: If Not Joe, Then Who?
Based on the question, I would have to answer Gregg Williams. This was clearly a 5 year plan that they set up in 2004, and we still have to see the final year play out. So you don't want great upheaval in the coaching staff. Promote GW to head coach, promote Blache to defensive coordinator, and let Saunders work with the offense.
But that's only if Gibbs steps aside this offseason. Gibbs is our best option to coach going forward. If he doesn't want to be on the field next year, by promoting Gregg Williams and Blache and leaving the offense in tact, you essentially keep this team the way Gibbs builds it. If Gibbs stays next year, things dont get better, and then he walks away, then I think it's time to clean house as far as the coordinators go. We haven't been especially good with the coaching this year. Certainly it hasn't been historically bad enough to cost us any games, but the room for improvement is there, and arguably necessary.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
12-02-2007, 09:52 PM | #33 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: If Not Joe, Then Who?
Williams, of course, better start doing his CURRENT job better. We really aren't that far away on either side of the ball, but our coverage is just too damn soft. For big plays to happen when we play so damn soft the whole entire game is totally inexcusable.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
12-02-2007, 09:54 PM | #34 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 726
|
Re: If Not Joe, Then Who?
I'd be up for g williams so long as saunders agreed to stay on (continuity) will full control of all things offense...(I do not believe that gibbs isn't responsible for a lot of the "sitting on the lead" style of play)...just my opinion.
But I wouldn't cry over cower at all...
__________________
in writing these daily letters and trying to make them interesting it is always possible that some sentiment may occur which has not received the severe and deliberate scrutiny and reconsideration which should attach to a State Paper. - Churchill |
12-02-2007, 09:57 PM | #35 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: If Not Joe, Then Who?
Cowher's not a good coaching option...he's too tough on his players. The performance of his teams tends to decline as the season progresses. His own QB from his lone super bowl victory really doesn't like the way he coaches. Doubt Campbell would either.
No way in hell that anyone can argue that Cowher is better than Gibbs. That would just be an insane thing to say.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
12-02-2007, 09:59 PM | #36 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: If Not Joe, Then Who?
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
12-02-2007, 09:59 PM | #37 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 60
Posts: 3,419
|
Re: If Not Joe, Then Who?
Unfortunately, Gibbs/Saunders tend to move away from plays/formations that are working, resulting in the flat 2nd half offensive performances that have led to defeat. Buffalo defended the run great all day, and Cooley/Moss were tearing them up. They had no answer for 3 and 4 receiver sets. Somehow, we got away from what was working against this D as soon as we went up 16-5. This has been a recurring theme all season. To hell with balance if the opposing defense demonstrates zero ability to stop a part of our game plan. Keep attacking that weakness until the cows come home.
|
12-02-2007, 10:09 PM | #38 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: If Not Joe, Then Who?
In my opinion, the defense is doing a pretty decent job. Are they doing enough to compensate for the offense's shortcomings? No. Are they stopping opponents from making plays in some key situations? No. But, they're doing a decent job, particularly when you consider that Sean passed away, Rogers in on IR, and Springs and Smoot have been playing with injuries or missing games.
|
12-02-2007, 10:14 PM | #39 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: If Not Joe, Then Who?
Quote:
Two big plays, I'm sorry. I forgot how when given every possible defensive advantage, our guys still couldn't defend a deep in route from Josh Reed. It's only, you know, the only place the Bills can go with the football at that point. We can't excuse that. He made bad calls against the Cards and got lucky there, bad calls against Philly the first time, and a great individual play saved us there, gave up huge plays vs. Dallas and Philly (2nd time), and doesn't ever account for the QB in pass coverage. Gregg Williams may not have a lot of help, but he's doing a bad job, and it's becoming a trend. Either he swallows his pride and makes adjustments or we get someone who can.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
12-02-2007, 10:16 PM | #40 |
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 8,341
|
Re: If Not Joe, Then Who?
Greg WIlliams is my first choice, he's fiery and I think we need that. I wouldn't be against bringing Grimm back either.
__________________
Best. Player. Available. |
12-02-2007, 10:21 PM | #41 | |
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: If Not Joe, Then Who?
Quote:
__________________
Tardy |
|
12-02-2007, 10:23 PM | #42 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: If Not Joe, Then Who?
I'm torn on guys like Williams. Disciplinarians can do wonders for teams with talented, but careless players. But, they can also be run out of town on a rail if they start losing. Guys will put up with an a** if the team is winning, but when they fall upon hard times they seem to implode. Williams' last head coaching stint in Buffalo was not very good and, according to some, Williams was hated by many of his players and thought of as an arrogant $@#%. I like the idea of a fiery guy, but I'm not sure that Williams is our man.
|
12-02-2007, 10:24 PM | #43 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: If Not Joe, Then Who?
Quote:
Okay, so now...you make an adjustment. Bring the safeties up, lets go! You aren't going to stop bad things from happening to your defense. At least try to shut down the opposing offense.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
12-02-2007, 10:50 PM | #44 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 432
|
Re: If Not Joe, Then Who?
Quote:
|
|
12-02-2007, 10:53 PM | #45 | |
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: If Not Joe, Then Who?
Quote:
__________________
Tardy |
|
|
|