![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 61
Posts: 3,419
|
Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
Quote:
I still maintain that naming offensive and defensive coordinators before the head coach severely limits the head coaching options. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pacifica, CA
Posts: 15,164
|
Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
Quote:
__________________
Joe Gibbs- The best coach of all time, Lombardi trophy should be renamed Gibbs. Art Monk- Art was like an OL playing WR, doing the dirty work and not getting the glory. Darrell Green- Best DB ever. Purveyor of fine Filth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,555
|
Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
Interesting tidbit in JLC's latest blog. Says that the Titans have contacted the Skins for permission to talk to Williams. I can't imagine he'd go there to work under Schwartz would he?
Think it is between Fassel and Spagnolo though. I do feel better that at least they have told G. Williams he's out officially. Seems like maybe they could have done that a bit sooner, but better that both parties made a move (and maybe Williams initiated it). Someone asked about the other assistants - Redskins Insider UPDATE 1: Jason LaCanfora reports that the Rams and Raiders have asked the Redskins for permission to speak with Saunders about jobs and the Rams and Titans have asked for permission to speak to Williams about jobs, sources said. Apparently, teams still must do this because the two remain under contract.
__________________
It has taken a long time, but I have finally realized that nothing I say about the Redskins will have any effect upon anything the Redskins do. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 61
Posts: 3,419
|
Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
The Jags' D-coordinator was just named Atlanta's HC, so expect him to promote some of his Jax coaches to key positions on his defensive staff. If Jax hires Williams, he would probably have carte blanche to assemble his own defensive staff. He would certainly have a place for Jerry Gray if we don't retain him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
Well, that's good.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 5,644
|
Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
I wouldn't call this rebuilding. More like remodeling.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
i think synder just wants a coach he can control and dictate to, instead of one that would actually want to make sound decisions on free agents and trades.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
Quote:
It's when I imagine that possible scenario that a Jim Fassel hiring makes sense.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
|
Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
Hmm.. that would be a young coordinator who hasn't been a head coach.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,592
|
Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
Matty and SmootSmack, I think you guys are right on with what you've said in this thread. You've tried to calm the masses, but it doesn't seem like its working (big surprise!).
Do you think there is someone lined up already? Just a couple options? Or are they still playing the entire field? |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
|
Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
Quote:
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pacifica, CA
Posts: 15,164
|
Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
Not only that, do you think either one of those guys wants a built in staff or build their own? Sounds like they already made their choice and it's probably Fassel.
__________________
Joe Gibbs- The best coach of all time, Lombardi trophy should be renamed Gibbs. Art Monk- Art was like an OL playing WR, doing the dirty work and not getting the glory. Darrell Green- Best DB ever. Purveyor of fine Filth |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
|
Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
If that's the case, that's going to be an interesting press conference. I say people should protest. LOL.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,592
|
Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
Quote:
Why would they wait until after the Super Bowl? Snyder said 1. not to distract from the championship (please!) 2. To keep their options open. Now noone is going to take what comes out of a FO at face value so lets dig a little deeper. Could he, as I said before, just delaying naming Fassel HC until the details of a contract are hashed out? I doubt it. Gibbs said to his former asst. a few days ago that it could be a couple weeks til a coach is named. It sounds to me from both Snyder's and Gibbs comments that they have someone in the Super Bowl that they are at least considering. And the fact that they have hired coordinators suggests that they at least have an idea of how this mystery candidate would feel about them. I dont know how conflicting this all might be to league rules. Is it an dont ask dont tell kind of policy? Or can you really have NO contact with candidates still in contention? Can you talk to them via their agent and still be within NFL guideline? I have no idea. But these are fairly deliberate moves they have made, and it seems that there is something going on that we aren't seeing. But I think we can almost certainly count Fassel out, though we haven't heard that he is officially out of the running. I guess, as someone said before, that they are just stringing him along as a second option, but he certainly is not a front runner at this point. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|