04-28-2008, 04:18 PM | #31 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Redskins Insider: Draft Review
irish was positive about Todd Collins, if nothing else.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
Advertisements |
04-28-2008, 04:20 PM | #32 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
|
Re: Redskins Insider: Draft Review
Quote:
"No team can go four wide receivers and two tight ends all the time. Just can't be done. Unless they plan on running a whole lot of empty backfield, it's going to be tricky utilizing all of these guys and the existing one. Yes, they certainly have great depth at pass catcher now, but at the expense of how much else?" I tend not to listen to sportswriters (and fans who think they are "more correct than not") who don't have a clue.... JLC is correct, you can't run four WRs & two TEs. It requires 12 players, or an illegal formation. JLCs credibility (and yours) just went out the window. JLC is the main Washington Post writer for the Redskins and he doesn't know enough about football to know the VERY basics. Embarrassing! HS players know this stuff.
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996. |
|
04-28-2008, 04:31 PM | #33 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
|
Re: Redskins Insider: Draft Review
Quote:
You will have to email JLC and let him know that only 11 players are allowed on the field at a time. I'm sure he didnt know this. |
|
04-28-2008, 04:36 PM | #34 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 101
|
Re: Redskins Insider: Draft Review
Quote:
It would be nice instead of bashing peoples credibility and moving on, to go ahead and explain how all these players will be utilized. It's quite obvious what JLC's point is that there is only room for so many of the same skill players. So lets throw out the 4-2 analogy and explain how you would use Moss, El, Cooley, Davis, Kelly, Sellars, Thomas, and lets throw Portis in that mix? Keep in mind these players were not drafted to be backup's in this league. When you finish lets compare there possible production to other needs at other positions. |
|
04-28-2008, 04:45 PM | #35 |
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Age: 35
Posts: 1,092
|
Re: Redskins Insider: Draft Review
can you tell me the last time a team has picked two WR's and a TE in a draft and all of them were ready to go by or even productive in their first year? I really doubt that we're gonna have a problem choosing how to field all the receivers because I doubt all will be healthy or productive at the same time. If they are all healthy and productive and we have to choose who plays I personally think that's a good problem to have.
|
04-28-2008, 04:58 PM | #36 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
|
Re: Redskins Insider: Draft Review
Quote:
To your point, Kelly and Thomas will probably not both be ready as a # 1 & #2 WR on day one, they will need to develop and learn the NFL and WCO. Here's what I envision this year as a few personnel packages: I-Form: Moss - Z, Thomas - X, Cooley TE, Sellars FB, Portis will be RB is all formations. I-Form or Split-Back (hands): same as above with Davis / Cooley at FB & TE, not sure who is where depends on what Zorn wants to do. 3WR: Moss - Z, Thomas - X, ARE - Slot, Sellars or Cooley FB 3WR (Singleback): same as above Cooley at TE Singleback, 2TE - Moss - Z, Thomas - X, Davis & Cooley TEs Singleback, 2TE wide - same as above with Davis & Cooley either wide or in the slots 4WR - Moss, ARE, Kelly, Thomas. 4WR, TE - add Cooley to above Moss will probably not get through the year healthy. ARE is a good slot WR, not much more. Cooley & Davis can create a lot of mismatches unless a team has very good coverage LBs. If a D brings in a nickle package against a 2TE formation for coverage they will get smashed on a run. If a D stays with LB coverage they better have some good cover LBs to account for Cooley & Davis. Sellars will be a traditional blocking FB. The 2nd round picks are going to be very "cap friendly" for at least three years. By 2010 Moss & ARE will be able to be released and will probably not be effective at that point anyway. From a skill player perspective we are set at WR, TE, RB for at least 3 years. These guys give Zorn many formations to go to and many potential mismatches against the D to exploit. Kelly and Thomas are also bigger WRs, gives Campbell bigger targets as he develops his accuracy. Now how about you come up with a point better than: They should've gotten OL / DL or Campbell won't be able to throw if he doesn't have time.
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996. |
|
04-28-2008, 05:05 PM | #37 |
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,426
|
Re: Redskins Insider: Draft Review
My knowledge is more knowledgeable than your knowledge.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
04-28-2008, 05:09 PM | #38 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 50
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Redskins Insider: Draft Review
I'd like to see some evidence that Malcolm Kelly was falling down others teams' draft boards. Somehow I don't think he would have lasted much longer than where we picked him. As for La Canfora's point of a 'self-fulfilling prophecy', all teams have their own draft boards and they rank players where they think they should be. Sometimes they're wrong, sometimes they're right.
Some of you know that I've been very critical of Cerrato and Snyder over the years, but based on the pre-draft information available to everyone leading up to Saturday, it looks like we got some top-rated guys much later than they were expected to go. And when you can pick up extra selections in the process, then I must give credit where credit is due and say bravo to Vinny. I also like the mentality of restocking the wideout department. I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if both Moss and Randle El aren't here in 2009 unless cap constraints make it impossible for that to happen. But just like any other draft, you can't possibly address all your needs on one April weekend. This offense simply doesn't score enough points. Overhauling the receivers was something this team was going to have to do at some point. They will have to rebuild the foundation of the offensive line too, no doubt. But it's not like it's falling apart before our eyes. If these guys can get us into the endzone more often this season, nobody will be complaining. |
04-28-2008, 05:57 PM | #39 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1
|
Re: Redskins Insider: Draft Review
I know how we all love to speculate about the upcoming season and wait in earnest for September to roll around so we can see a glimpse of greatness from recent draft picks and free agent pickups. All I want to say is it is impossible to accurately assess how the Skins will fair each season because we have two morons at the head of our organization. Snyder and Cerratto have been a plague to this team for as long as I can remember. Blown draft picks and absurb free agent signings are a common phenomenon in this town. Just rattling off a few names: Adam Archuleta, Brandon Lloyd, TJ Duckett, Bruce Smith, and Ade Jimoh. All these players with the exception of Jimoh were given enormous salaries and bonuses and yielded little or no production. They actually in reality hurt us. Duckett was famous for losing yards, any deep ball would fly over Jimoh's head, Archuleta couldnt cover a cripple, and Lloyd has about 20 catches in 3 years...
I have been a fan of this team for 20 years and I love them to death. I just want people to understand that in D.C. no one can know how each season will pan out... On a good note, our draft was relatively successful. We could have used an aggressive, quick, strong DE but you can never get what you want with the team all the time. |
04-28-2008, 06:06 PM | #40 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
|
Re: Redskins Insider: Draft Review
Quote:
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996. |
|
04-28-2008, 06:12 PM | #41 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Redskins Insider: Draft Review
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
04-28-2008, 06:25 PM | #42 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: Redskins Insider: Draft Review
This goes back to what I have said recently about JLC and his "sources". He seems to value thier opinion over all else. Who they are and what their motivations go out the window. I know he has guys he trusts but maybe the "self-fulfilling prophecy" is that he seeks out nay sayers. I'd like him for once to just say "I don't agree with this" Rather than "League sources are skeptical". Of course they are. They have reason to support the decision and don't even know what the process was in making the decision. In fact in some cases they are keenly motivated to disgaree for no other reason other than to simply disagree because it is an opponent. I am sure the Skins look around and make judgements of other teams. Their opinions matter(or don't) as much as anyone else's.
|
04-28-2008, 06:49 PM | #43 |
Propane and propane accessories
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Age: 55
Posts: 4,719
|
Re: Redskins Insider: Draft Review
For what it's worth, Boswell also had his doubts about our day 1 choices, and for the same reasons, pretty much:
washingtonpost.com I don't think Boswell is an off-the-wall nay-sayer. He's pretty straight up about these things. And while it may well turn out just fine, it's not off-the-wall for JLac to point out that this is not how other teams are doing things, from the coaching selection process to the draft. And it's not like this is the first time Danny and Vinny ahve done things their own way--it's what they do. Maybe it'll work out. But it's not the conventional wisdom. Sure, Kiper and other network and internent pundits liked it. But that's not the only legit opinion on drafting. Think back to when we made the TE and 2nd WR pick. How did you react then? We can go look at the draft thread. I was unsure, as were many of you. So we've now come round and convinced ourselves that it's ok. Fine. Maybe that's right. But JLac isn't being overly negative to bring up the contrary view. His coverage has been excellent, in the following sense: he's ALWAYS working that beat. He puts in tons of time on the paper and the blog, AND he answers emails. So you don't agree with his opinion; that's part of the process. But to say he's off his rocker and just being negative is too harsh in this case, IMHO.
__________________
Hail from Houston! |
04-28-2008, 06:55 PM | #44 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 2 Minutes away from Fedex Field, Maryland
Posts: 363
|
Re: Redskins Insider: Draft Review
Quote:
Yeah, Kelly looks pretty good because of his height, but Devin Thomas looks more complete. I love his Anquan Boldin-like strength. He is really strong and has good speed. Also, JLC has been pretty good to me. I like his posts but this one really pisses me off. I hate when people judge things before they perform. He'd be mad if the Redskins had the same receivers from last year. We get more receivers and he's still complaining. pathetic. |
|
04-28-2008, 08:24 PM | #45 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,569
|
Re: Redskins Insider: Draft Review
Quote:
I think everyone has their gripes from time to time, you just tend to be overly pessimistic. It's hard to take people serious that are like that all the time, and on the other hand it's hard to take people serious who are always optimistic. I think a lot of people fall somewhere in the middle, probably more often than you realize. |
|
|
|