![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,036
|
re: Stuart Schweigert a Redskin
I dont know about this guy specifically...but I aint suprised that they brought in a safety with NFL experience..it is very likely he will be our 2nd or 3 safety at worst.
And that...my friends, said a lot about our thin experience at safety. Now all we need is depth with a starting quality OLB and I think we'll be good to start the season. I wouldn't mind a starting quality DT too.
__________________
I hate Dallas...Period Last edited by skinsnut; 06-02-2008 at 06:07 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,036
|
re: Stuart Schweigert a Redskin
Anybody know contract terms?
or at least duration?
__________________
I hate Dallas...Period |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,198
|
re: Stuart Schweigert a Redskin
Scheweigert will be at FS. Landry at SS
Bet on it RIP ST 21 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berlin, MD
Posts: 2,061
|
re: Stuart Schweigert a Redskin
I am exstatic that we signed this guy, but he will not start. Landry played pro bowl football at FS. Doughty played very smart solid football. Doughty was never out of position, and played great. Moving Landry back to SS will be taking a step backward. If Landry or Doughty gets hurt, then we move Landry to SS or let Schweigert play FS, along with Doughty. Thats how I see it.
Last edited by T.O.Killa; 06-02-2008 at 08:47 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,198
|
re: Stuart Schweigert a Redskin
Personally I think Schweigert is a huge upgrade over Doughty.
This definetly replaces/ or gives competition for Doughty at SS or FS |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: Stuart Schweigert a Redskin
Man, no love for Doughty at all? What did he do wrong last year? I don't mind Stuart being a Redskin, but to me the thought that Doughty's going to just be upended by Schweigert is baffaling.
I hate being put into a corner like this, as I felt the same way when Mix mania was at it's peak and I had to argue against Mix making an impact, despite the fact I kind of liked him, I just didn't like him THAT much. I do feel that Reed is going to be a starter this year and he's going to do just what he did last year, and thats play solid, mistake free, hard nosed football. Personally I liked Landry a lot better at FS anyway, as I saw it as the more ground Landry gets to cover the more plays he'll get in on, but thats up to the coaching staff. Plus if you look at Landry's highlight tapes, most of the highlights seemed to come when he played FS, of course the problem with that argument is he had more NFL experience when he was moved to FS then when he played at SS (follow?). Anyway I feel that after training camp the Reed-Landry combo will be used more then the Schwiegert-Landry combo though both will probably be used throughout the year especially if matchups dictate that we have a huge advantage playing Landry at SS for a particular game, but I still think that we're going to see more Landry at FS and Reed playing SS. Actually you know what? Fuck it. Schwiegert starts at FS, Doughty starts at SS. Landry can come off the bench in Nickle situations.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Stuart Schweigert a Redskin
Quote:
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Newport News,Virginia
Age: 61
Posts: 4,495
|
Re: Stuart Schweigert a Redskin
Quote:
But arigato for the commentary......
__________________
"There's no greater feeling than moving a man from Point A to Point B, against his will." #68 THANKS COACH GIBBS FOR EVERYTHING! YOUR THE MAN AND ALWAYS WILL BE! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
MVP
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 46
Posts: 10,069
|
Re: Stuart Schweigert a Redskin
He seems cool...he's gonna fit in real nice with Cooley and Portis...hopefully he can play.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder." -Jenkins |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,767
|
Re: Stuart Schweigert a Redskin
LaRon Landry is our FS. He is not getting moved to SS.
All of our other safeties including Schweigert are not good enough to be our FS and allow Landry to move over to SS. Landry's natural position is FS anyway, why move him? From what I read it would be a good career move for Schweigert to move to SS which better suits his strengths (tackling) and protects him from his perceived weakness (coverage). I keep hearing he did not play well at the FS postion just like Reed Doughty two yeas ago. So they are both very similar. I would not be surprised to see the redskins pick up another Safety off waivers when final cuts happen later this summer. A decent safety may become available after final cuts. Last edited by Defensewins; 06-03-2008 at 12:55 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Stuart Schweigert a Redskin
My untrained eyes lead me to believe that Laron is best suited to play FS. However, I distinctly recall the coaching staff saying this offseason that they'd like to move him back to SS. I don't know if that is still the case.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,767
|
Re: Stuart Schweigert a Redskin
Quote:
We do not have anyone on the roster that can play the FS as well as LaRon. A few years ago in preseason Reed Doughty was tried at starting FS but failed. Doughty also played FS in regualr season when ST was injured and he also burned. But when they started Doughty at SS after Talyor's death Doughty was adequate. That tells you how much more difficult the FS position is to master in the NFL and how much more responsibility that position requires than the SS position. Why then would move our best safety to SS and start a lesser player at a more important position? That would be like moving Portis to FB. Last edited by Defensewins; 06-03-2008 at 05:22 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 37
Posts: 1,066
|
Re: Stuart Schweigert a Redskin
Quote:
Last edited by RMSkins; 06-03-2008 at 05:44 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Stuart Schweigert a Redskin
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
MVP
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 46
Posts: 10,069
|
Re: Stuart Schweigert a Redskin
I would rather have Landry as free safety. The way he played filling in for ST was unbelievable. Those two picks in the playoffs against the Seattle were spectacular and I hope to god he plays FS.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder." -Jenkins |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|