Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-11-2009, 11:30 PM   #31
saden1
MVP
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 45
Posts: 10,069
Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
Baltimore got some real lucky breaks against Tenn and I think their corners are suspect. I don't think they beat Pittsburgh at Pittsburgh.
Lucky? They forced 3 turnovers...I'm sure cheers of Ravens fans channeled all the luck in the universe and willed them to win.

Oh, when you have Ed Reed back there you corners can be suspect not that their corners are as suspect as you think.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder."

-Jenkins
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 01-11-2009, 11:37 PM   #32
The Goat
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?

How is it that SD couldn't get to Ben? Philly was all over him earlier in the season and even the lowly Redskins pass-rush got 4 sacks on him.
__________________
24-34
The Goat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2009, 11:45 PM   #33
SFREDSKIN
Living Legend
 
SFREDSKIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pacifica, CA
Posts: 15,164
Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goat View Post
How is it that SD couldn't get to Ben? Philly was all over him earlier in the season and even the lowly Redskins pass-rush got 4 sacks on him.
The Steelers have a decent OL, when the playoffs arrive is all about who's the hungriest team. Just look at the Cardinals, they stunk up the joint from Thanksgiving until the playoffs arrived.
__________________
Joe Gibbs- The best coach of all time, Lombardi trophy should be renamed Gibbs.

Art Monk- Art was like an OL playing WR, doing the dirty work and not getting the glory.

Darrell Green- Best DB ever.


Purveyor of fine Filth
SFREDSKIN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2009, 11:51 PM   #34
SFREDSKIN
Living Legend
 
SFREDSKIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pacifica, CA
Posts: 15,164
Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?

This guy is a little over confident:

Gene Wojciechowski examines Arizona's long-shot chances - ESPN

I hope the Cardinals kick their ASS!!
__________________
Joe Gibbs- The best coach of all time, Lombardi trophy should be renamed Gibbs.

Art Monk- Art was like an OL playing WR, doing the dirty work and not getting the glory.

Darrell Green- Best DB ever.


Purveyor of fine Filth
SFREDSKIN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2009, 11:54 PM   #35
The Goat
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?

Probably just wishful thinking but I believe Ben is just a monster hit or two away from losing his effectiveness. I was just very surprised SD didn't target him especially after the serious concussion... Ray-Ray and the Ravens will do everything they can to put Ben on the turf.
__________________
24-34
The Goat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2009, 11:55 PM   #36
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Defensewins View Post
Your right it was not Joe Buck. It was who ever was partnered with Phil Simms during that game.?.?
It was Jim Nantz.
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2009, 12:02 AM   #37
rypper11
The Starter
 
rypper11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,228
Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott View Post
3-2 against the remaining teams in contention...I think it just shows that we can play with the best of them, but not consistently...
3-0 against NFC championship teams
0-2 against AFC championship teams

In fact, 7-5 against NFC overall and 1-3 against AFC overall.
Maybe we could petition the NFL for no games against AFC?
__________________
Playing a kids game for a kings ransom.
rypper11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2009, 12:06 AM   #38
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goat View Post
Probably just wishful thinking but I believe Ben is just a monster hit or two away from losing his effectiveness. I was just very surprised SD didn't target him especially after the serious concussion... Ray-Ray and the Ravens will do everything they can to put Ben on the turf.
Why do you wish that?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2009, 09:34 AM   #39
SouperMeister
Playmaker
 
SouperMeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 60
Posts: 3,419
Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN View Post
The Steelers have a decent OL, when the playoffs arrive is all about who's the hungriest team. Just look at the Cardinals, they stunk up the joint from Thanksgiving until the playoffs arrived.
Even more importantly, most of the playoff winners this post-season have been dictated by who got the steadier QB play. Eli was terrible yesterday, and Delhomme was categorically worse on Saturday.
SouperMeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2009, 10:31 AM   #40
Giantone
Gamebreaker
 
Giantone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 14,029
Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott View Post
3-2 against the remaining teams in contention...I think it just shows that we can play with the best of them, but not consistently...

Were those teams any good when you played them?
Giantone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2009, 10:34 AM   #41
44Deezel
The Starter
 
44Deezel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Davidsonville
Posts: 1,783
Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paintrain View Post
Since we beat both NFC Championship teams does that mean

A. It's a good sign meaning we're right there with the best in the conference?

B. It's a bad sign meaning we may have as much talent to play with those teams but for some reason we're still not good enough to consistently compete?

C. It's a sign of danger because the front office will think that we're this close to being a Super Bowl team.

What do you think?
It means the Bengals think they're going to the playoffs next year, because they tied and Eagles and beat the team that swept the Eagles AND Cardinals

The Eagles and Cardinals lost to everybody. It goes to show that missing the playoffs because of losses to the Rams, Bengals and 49ers is inexcusable. Anything can happen in the playoffs. Just gotta get in!
44Deezel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2009, 10:34 AM   #42
Giantone
Gamebreaker
 
Giantone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 14,029
Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?

Quote:
Originally Posted by rypper11 View Post
3-0 against NFC championship teams
0-2 against AFC championship teams

In fact, 7-5 against NFC overall and 1-3 against AFC overall.
Maybe we could petition the NFL for no games against AFC?
But the Giants swept you ?Untill someone else wins it the Giants are still the NFC Champions.
Giantone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2009, 10:56 AM   #43
ridgely
Camp Scrub
 
ridgely's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: silver spring
Posts: 3
Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?

It's bad. I still remember Snyder on tv screaming in the bowels of the Linc about beating Dallas,Philly! Yeah! on the road. He's an idiot.
ridgely is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2009, 11:04 AM   #44
44ever
Registered User
 
44ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The Fortune Teller
Posts: 2,512
Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 44Deezel View Post
It means the Bengals think they're going to the playoffs next year, because they tied and Eagles and beat the team that swept the Eagles AND Cardinals

The Eagles and Cardinals lost to everybody. It goes to show that missing the playoffs because of losses to the Rams, Bengals and 49ers is inexcusable. Anything can happen in the playoffs. Just gotta get in!
Good point on the Bengals 44Deez. We sweept the Eagles because Westbrook wasn't 100% the 2nd game. McNabb was also his twin brother.

I'd like to add we had the potential to beat any team in the NFL the first half of the season including the Giants which we played well. Unfortunatly we had them first game of the season coming of there SB.

Bottom line, the teams that come on late in the season win in the playoffs. We did it backwards as usual. No way could we compete in the playoffs at this point. But we do have the potential.
44ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2009, 11:08 AM   #45
TheMalcolmConnection
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,233
Re: Philly vs. Arizona-Good sign, bad sign or sign of danger?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Giantone View Post
Yup , the Eagles beat the Giants today now the #1,2,and 3 seed of the NFC are all out which bows well fro the AFC.We were out played but more important we were out coached today AR beat Coughlin all the way around the board.I'll be rooting for the Steelers becuase McNabb is so classless I just can't root for him.
I wouldn't even say you were outplayed. It seems like this past few weeks that the Eagles have caught teams on their worst games of the season. I swear the Cardinals better freaking take it to them.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.92121 seconds with 10 queries