Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


How long do you keep Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly if they don't produce?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-10-2009, 05:00 PM   #31
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,348
Re: How long do you keep Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly if they don't produce?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DIRTEE View Post
If you play them all preseason, they will be fine for the regular season. The real question is when will we see the mythical double tight end formation featuring Fred Davis and Chris Cooley in the redzone.
The same day you will see the mythical double RB formation they talked about in the offseason last year. :smashfrea
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 03-10-2009, 05:04 PM   #32
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: How long do you keep Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly if they don't produce?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SBXVII View Post
The team needs to play to it's individual strengths also. If Thomas is nothing but a run straight down the field type of player then they need to utilize that. Send him on speed routes. I know Moss is currently doing that but teams will be baffled as to double teaming Moss and covering Thomas. Then use either Randel El or Kelly on other routes.

If it takes 2-3 yrs for a WR to develope and come into his own, which people are saying of two possible 1st rounders in Kelly and Thomas, then why didn't we keep some of the other WR's we had last yr to develope them? Heck I went on NFL.com and checked the WR's and I can only find McMullen who is available.

Maurice Mann:CFL.ca

Also I can't find Marcus Monk any where. The Giants picked him up then cut him. He was somone who was supposed to possibly make it somewhere.
Monk went back to college to play basketball

# 10 Marcus Monk - University of Arkansas Athletics
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2009, 05:51 PM   #33
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,452
Re: How long do you keep Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly if they don't produce?

ok, so i refrained for 3 pages, but i gotta atleast get it in:

hopefully longer than we keep Hixon.

K I said it, I will leave it alone now!
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2009, 06:04 PM   #34
Redskin Jim
Impact Rookie
 
Redskin Jim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Orleans, LA- via VA
Age: 46
Posts: 710
Re: How long do you keep Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly if they don't produce?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Meks View Post
i dont consider it fair to CUT them, when we really dont give them a chance to produce as much as we'd like to see.... it has A WHOLE LOT to do with the play -calling and the QB, i still say give them more time even if this year isnt thier greatest
I agree, it doesn't make since to draft them last year, and spend the time developing their game, just to cut them.. I do think at some time this season, (hopefully earlier than later), they must be forced to step up their game. In other words: Fly or Die! and push them out of their nest.. They both have the tools to be big contributers and we need their size and speed on the field, The Skins just need to force these two into the roles we drafted them to play..
__________________
Hail to The REDSKINS
Redskin Jim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2009, 06:22 PM   #35
Paintrain
Pro Bowl
 
Paintrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
Re: How long do you keep Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly if they don't produce?

It's kind of REDECULES to even discuss at this point, but you've got to give them their rookie contract duration. I posted something similar to this right after the end of the season but would you advocate cutting players that posted 1st season stats that were as follows?

10 catches, 154 yards, 0 TD
29 catches, 446 yards, 3 TD
20 catches, 309 yards, 2 TD
3 catches, 59 yards, 0 TD
35 catches, 520 yards, 4 TD
2 catches, 40 yards, 0 TD
14 catches, 186 yards, 0 TD
3 catches, 31 yards, 1 TD

If so, then you just released Steve Smith, Roddy White, Brandon Marshall, Vincent Jackson, Terrell Owens, Santana Moss, Derrick Mason and Donald Driver. That would be more than 1/3 of the top 15 WR in the league (statistically) from last year and 8 of the top 20. Even Vinny ain't that dumb.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom
1981-2014

I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life!

Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier
Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman
Paintrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2009, 06:35 PM   #36
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: How long do you keep Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly if they don't produce?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paintrain View Post
It's kind of REDECULES to even discuss at this point, but you've got to give them their rookie contract duration. I posted something similar to this right after the end of the season but would you advocate cutting players that posted 1st season stats that were as follows?

10 catches, 154 yards, 0 TD
29 catches, 446 yards, 3 TD
20 catches, 309 yards, 2 TD
3 catches, 59 yards, 0 TD
35 catches, 520 yards, 4 TD
2 catches, 40 yards, 0 TD
14 catches, 186 yards, 0 TD
3 catches, 31 yards, 1 TD

If so, then you just released Steve Smith, Roddy White, Brandon Marshall, Vincent Jackson, Terrell Owens, Santana Moss, Derrick Mason and Donald Driver. That would be more than 1/3 of the top 15 WR in the league (statistically) from last year and 8 of the top 20. Even Vinny ain't that dumb.
Those are good stats for sure. Makes me feel better about Devin and Malcolm. I don't think anyone suggested we cut the cord with either of them right now though. IMO, unless 2009 is a total disaster for them stats-wise, they'll both be Redskins in 2010 as well.
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2009, 06:38 PM   #37
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,348
Re: How long do you keep Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly if they don't produce?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paintrain View Post
It's kind of REDECULES to even discuss at this point, but you've got to give them their rookie contract duration. I posted something similar to this right after the end of the season but would you advocate cutting players that posted 1st season stats that were as follows?

10 catches, 154 yards, 0 TD
29 catches, 446 yards, 3 TD
20 catches, 309 yards, 2 TD
3 catches, 59 yards, 0 TD
35 catches, 520 yards, 4 TD
2 catches, 40 yards, 0 TD
14 catches, 186 yards, 0 TD
3 catches, 31 yards, 1 TD

If so, then you just released Steve Smith, Roddy White, Brandon Marshall, Vincent Jackson, Terrell Owens, Santana Moss, Derrick Mason and Donald Driver. That would be more than 1/3 of the top 15 WR in the league (statistically) from last year and 8 of the top 20. Even Vinny ain't that dumb.
Excellent post.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2009, 06:43 PM   #38
REDSKIN1
Special Teams
 
REDSKIN1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ROANOKE, VA
Age: 47
Posts: 109
Re: How long do you keep Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly if they don't produce?

Malcom and Devins development rests squarely on the shoulders of the coaching staff. If these guys aren't given more opportunities in games there's no way that they can become effective players in the NFL. At some point the coach Zorn is going to have to realize that in order to improve his team these guys have got to get some significant play time on the field. Take a look around at what the other rookie receives did in the league last year, I'm sure there were growing pains, but the difference is the other teams stuck to their rookies. Here Zorn is to scared to play them because they may make a mistake. Personally I would take either of these guys as the number 2 receiver over Randel EL, and just let them hopefully work out the kinks. If not then we can expect the same results that we had last year on off., double on Moss and no one else open, Campbell sacked...........
__________________
"AND YOU KNOW THIS MAN"
REDSKIN1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2009, 06:49 PM   #39
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: How long do you keep Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly if they don't produce?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paintrain View Post
It's kind of REDECULES to even discuss at this point, but you've got to give them their rookie contract duration. I posted something similar to this right after the end of the season but would you advocate cutting players that posted 1st season stats that were as follows?

10 catches, 154 yards, 0 TD
29 catches, 446 yards, 3 TD
20 catches, 309 yards, 2 TD
3 catches, 59 yards, 0 TD
35 catches, 520 yards, 4 TD
2 catches, 40 yards, 0 TD
14 catches, 186 yards, 0 TD
3 catches, 31 yards, 1 TD

If so, then you just released Steve Smith, Roddy White, Brandon Marshall, Vincent Jackson, Terrell Owens, Santana Moss, Derrick Mason and Donald Driver. That would be more than 1/3 of the top 15 WR in the league (statistically) from last year and 8 of the top 20. Even Vinny ain't that dumb.
Out of all the players on that list, only Santana Moss and Roddy White were drafted above the third round.

I think it's way too early to just throw in the towel on our second rounders, but you could and should say that the rookie years were a colossal disappointment, and that (for a diverse set of reasons), none of the players we drafted last year could handle being a fourth option in an NFL offense, which means their behind schedule.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2009, 07:24 PM   #40
GusFrerotte
Registered User
 
GusFrerotte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
Re: How long do you keep Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly if they don't produce?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMScud View Post
That's a big IF. I've mentioned this before - I have a friend who is a personal trainer for the Redskins. He's in the weight room in Ashburn with these guys at least few times a week, and hears all sorts of stuff. He only worked with them twice a week last year, but he got bumped up to four times a week now. Apparently Devin Thomas is a bit of a punch line amongst the other players. Really poor work ethic.

That is sad to hear, but to be honest on par for Michigan St players. Those guys in E Lansing party hardy, and for MSU players in the NFL, they never tend to pan out at all. Charles Rogers is the recent prime example. Drew Stanton will never be healthy enough to even give himself a chance in the league.
GusFrerotte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2009, 07:29 PM   #41
GusFrerotte
Registered User
 
GusFrerotte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
Re: How long do you keep Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly if they don't produce?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paintrain View Post
It's kind of REDECULES to even discuss at this point, but you've got to give them their rookie contract duration. I posted something similar to this right after the end of the season but would you advocate cutting players that posted 1st season stats that were as follows?

10 catches, 154 yards, 0 TD
29 catches, 446 yards, 3 TD
20 catches, 309 yards, 2 TD
3 catches, 59 yards, 0 TD
35 catches, 520 yards, 4 TD
2 catches, 40 yards, 0 TD
14 catches, 186 yards, 0 TD
3 catches, 31 yards, 1 TD

If so, then you just released Steve Smith, Roddy White, Brandon Marshall, Vincent Jackson, Terrell Owens, Santana Moss, Derrick Mason and Donald Driver. That would be more than 1/3 of the top 15 WR in the league (statistically) from last year and 8 of the top 20. Even Vinny ain't that dumb.

Nice stats! How long did it take for you to dig those up? Kelly and Thomas will be here for at least through the end of their contract. Can't judge how a guy is going to turn out by a rookie season like you perfectly pointed out with these stats. If they don't cut the mustard just don't resign them. By that time they should be producing, so the issue will be moot hopefully. I just hope Kelly gets healthy and stays that way unlike Taylor Jacobs, a total waste of cap space.
GusFrerotte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2009, 07:30 PM   #42
Skinny Tee
The Starter
 
Skinny Tee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Redskins Nation
Posts: 1,715
Re: How long do you keep Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly if they don't produce?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Out of all the players on that list, only Santana Moss and Roddy White were drafted above the third round.

I think it's way too early to just throw in the towel on our second rounders, but you could and should say that the rookie years were a colossal disappointment, and that (for a diverse set of reasons), none of the players we drafted last year could handle being a fourth option in an NFL offense, which means their behind schedule.
Yeah, I agree with this. Also our offensive line has to improve to the point where we can specifically determine if Thomas or Kelly are the weak spots in our offense.
__________________
Redskinsly,
_________Skinny Tee_________
Skinny Tee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2009, 07:58 PM   #43
Warren85Ellard
Special Teams
 
Warren85Ellard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Reston,VA
Posts: 330
Re: How long do you keep Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly if they don't produce?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Out of all the players on that list, only Santana Moss and Roddy White were drafted above the third round.

I think it's way too early to just throw in the towel on our second rounders, but you could and should say that the rookie years were a colossal disappointment, and that (for a diverse set of reasons), none of the players we drafted last year could handle being a fourth option in an NFL offense, which means their behind schedule.
I agree man. Also, I'd like to know what the coaches and teammates were saying about those guys from the list, in regards to their work ethic.....for instance, I doubt that guys like Steve Smith and T.O. were ever known as slackers..... If Devin Thomas has a poor work ethic, why didn't we know this before we drafted him?
Warren85Ellard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2009, 08:28 PM   #44
Paintrain
Pro Bowl
 
Paintrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
Re: How long do you keep Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly if they don't produce?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GusFrerotte View Post
Nice stats! How long did it take for you to dig those up? Kelly and Thomas will be here for at least through the end of their contract. Can't judge how a guy is going to turn out by a rookie season like you perfectly pointed out with these stats. If they don't cut the mustard just don't resign them. By that time they should be producing, so the issue will be moot hopefully. I just hope Kelly gets healthy and stays that way unlike Taylor Jacobs, a total waste of cap space.
About 10 minutes sitting on a conference call while surfing NFL.com. That's the funny thing, people are so quick to complain about things without any realistic perspective. It took no time to gain some comparisons to successful vets and show that 1st year production means zip as a career predictor.

Sure they were a disappointment, but they were rookies, with a rookie head coach, rookie play caller and a QB without experience in the system, what the hell did people expect?

As to the comment about Michigan State WR, didn't Plaxico go there?

As to the comment about their draft status, when did draft position become commensurate to production? Since Marques Colston was a 7th rounder should that be the standard for all rookie WR?
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom
1981-2014

I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life!

Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier
Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman
Paintrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2009, 08:31 PM   #45
Pocket$ $traight
Registered User
 
Pocket$ $traight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 48
Posts: 4,261
Re: How long do you keep Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly if they don't produce?

Well if they have the same numbers as last year than there is a pretty good chance that Zorn is gone and they will be learning a new system. So all of us need significant production out of them.

I would think that combined they need to produce like a #1 receiver so approximately 1000-1200 yards and 10 tds should be doable.

I would also like Fred Davis to get some balls. He may be the most talented out of the 3.
Pocket$ $traight is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.43514 seconds with 10 queries