![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,634
|
Re: No Huddle?
I think we need to mix it up and not be so predictable on offense. We had some poor clock managment during the Giant game late when we could not get the plays in quick enough which lead to a time out. The plus factor of the no huddle is defenses can't sub in fresh D-Lineman. So I hope we do go No Huddle more when needed. This can put pressure on the defense as long as we can keep the ball and convert 3rd downs. If we go 3 and out our defense will be on the field more.
__________________
www.islandstyleflowers.com Home of the Hawaiian Foam Flowers and Kukui Nut Leis. Great selections and best prices. Redskins Fan Since 1972 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Davidsonville
Posts: 1,783
|
Re: No Huddle?
All this shotgun talk reminds me of what they were saying about Vince Young in Tennessee before they figured out he just wasn't very good. Good QBs are good under center, under shot gun, when they're walking down the street, banging their hot model/pop star girlfriends, etc. They're just good. Period.
On the play where Campbell held onto the ball too long while tip-toeing around in the pocket instead of stepping up like a man, Cooley was in single coverage. Is was tight coverage, but single coverage in the NFL means your OPEN. Did anyone see Brady's 2 TDs at the end of the Bills game? Watson was blanketed, but it was single coverage and Brady let it rip without hesitation and gave his TE a chance to make a play. And he did and they won.
__________________
I am a system poster. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|