Redskins in 2010 Pro Bowl

CrazyCanuck · 12-30-2009, 12:50 PM

It's criminal that Fletch misses out again...

rbanerjee23 · 12-30-2009, 12:54 PM

I feel really bad for Fletcher who is possibly the best MLB in the game but good to see Orakpo get in as a rook and hope he wins DROY

BigHairedAristocrat · 12-30-2009, 01:26 PM

To me, the most interesting thing is that Orakpo, who as we all know is listed as a LB/DE made the pro-bowl as a outside linebacker, not a defensive end. I would say that as a linebacker, Orakpo is mediocre, at best. He's made the most plays when he's had his hand in the dirt, lining up as DE. To be honest, if he didnt make the pro-bowl as a DE then I really don't think he deserved to make it. Surely, there's got to be a more deserving linebacker out there.

diehardskin2982 · 12-30-2009, 01:56 PM

For fletch to get in the team has to be winning, it has to become a team goal. Vilma got in because the Saints are one of the hottest teams in the NFC. Rak should win the DRoy. Is he the only rookie to make it to the probowl?

53Fan · 12-30-2009, 01:58 PM

The Pro Bowl is a joke apparently. How could it be taken seriously? No Fletch...no credibility.

CultBrennan59 · 12-30-2009, 01:59 PM

Fletcher's chances rest with Saints; Carter is 2nd alternate
There is a chance that London Fletcher could play in his first Pro Bowl after all. Fletcher was named a first alternate to the NFC's team, which might not have meant a whole lot in past years. But this year, the Pro Bowl is being played one week before the Super Bowl, so any players who have a role in deciding the league's championship will sit out the all-star game.

What does that mean for Fletcher? Well, if New Orleans reaches the Super Bowl, linebacker Jonathan Vilma would be unable to play in the Pro Bowl -- clearing a path for the first alternate.

Fletcher has never played in the Pro Bowl but was a third alternate each of the past two seasons. He was also alternate in 2002, 2005 and 2006.

Andre Carter has been chosen to the team as a second alternate. Minnesota's Jared Allen, Carolina's Julius Peppers and Philadelphia's Trent Cole were selected ahead of Carter to play defensive end for the NFC's team.

CultBrennan59 · 12-30-2009, 01:59 PM

^^this is according to Jason Reid of the washington post.

at least fletch is a first alternate

SmootSmack · 12-30-2009, 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by diehardskin2982

For fletch to get in the team has to be winning, it has to become a team goal. Vilma got in because the Saints are one of the hottest teams in the NFC. Rak should win the DRoy. Is he the only rookie to make it to the probowl?

I think Byrd and Cushin also made the Pro Bowl

And I'm pretty sure I saw that Andre Carter is an alternate as well as Fletch

ArtMonkDrillz · 12-30-2009, 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

I think Byrd and Cushin also made the Pro Bowl

And I'm pretty sure I saw that Andre Carter is an alternate as well as Fletch

Yeah, I just read that Fletcher is a first alternate, which would mean that if the Saints make it to the Super Bowl he'd probably be in since Vilma wouldn't play in the Pro Bowl.
And Carter is a second alternate, so he probably has an outside shot.

EDIT: What Cult said...

rbanerjee23 · 12-30-2009, 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by diehardskin2982

For fletch to get in the team has to be winning, it has to become a team goal. Vilma got in because the Saints are one of the hottest teams in the NFC. Rak should win the DRoy. Is he the only rookie to make it to the probowl?

Cushing made it in and he is a rookie I'm pretty sure

MTK · 12-30-2009, 03:02 PM

Let's hope the Saints go all the way so Fletcher can play.

12thMan · 12-30-2009, 03:32 PM

The reason Fletch didn't make this year is the reason he never makes it. He's not perceived to be a playmaker. Fletch is a solid linebacker who consistently accumulates good stats year after year. To be more specific, he's good in pass coverage but not great. Vilma, on the other hand, while he may not be as rounded as Fletcher is considered more of playmaker. Particularly in coverage and defending passes.

I think Fletcher is derserving of a Pro Bowl nod this year, but it's obvious they're looking at something different when grading Fletcher.

sportscurmudgeon · 12-30-2009, 03:53 PM

Congratulations to Brian Orakpo.

CRedskinsRule · 12-30-2009, 05:44 PM

Just wondering, if Orakpo had a sudden "injury" would that bring Fletch in to the Pro Bowl? Not saying he should could or would sit out his first appearance, but would his missing the game allow Fletch to make a PB appearance?

SouperMeister · 12-30-2009, 05:48 PM

I thought that Andre Carter had an equally strong case, but definite congratulations to Brian Orakpo.

12-30-2009, 12:50 PM	#31
CrazyCanuck Serenity Now Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Canada Posts: 2,008	Re: Redskins in 2010 Pro Bowl It's criminal that Fletch misses out again...

12-30-2009, 12:54 PM	#32
rbanerjee23 The Starter Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 2,440	Re: Redskins in 2010 Pro Bowl I feel really bad for Fletcher who is possibly the best MLB in the game but good to see Orakpo get in as a rook and hope he wins DROY __________________ "Tough times don't last but tough people do" -Mike Shanahan HTTR

12-30-2009, 01:26 PM	#33
BigHairedAristocrat Playmaker Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 4,712	Re: Redskins in 2010 Pro Bowl To me, the most interesting thing is that Orakpo, who as we all know is listed as a LB/DE made the pro-bowl as a outside linebacker, not a defensive end. I would say that as a linebacker, Orakpo is mediocre, at best. He's made the most plays when he's had his hand in the dirt, lining up as DE. To be honest, if he didnt make the pro-bowl as a DE then I really don't think he deserved to make it. Surely, there's got to be a more deserving linebacker out there. __________________ Dolphins get good press for saving drowning humans.But we only hear about the swimmers theyve pushed ashore.You know who we havent heard from: all the people theyve pushed out to sea.Dolphins dont know what theyre doing-they just like pushing things.

12-30-2009, 01:56 PM	#34
diehardskin2982 Another Year, another mess. Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 3,581	Re: Redskins in 2010 Pro Bowl For fletch to get in the team has to be winning, it has to become a team goal. Vilma got in because the Saints are one of the hottest teams in the NFC. Rak should win the DRoy. Is he the only rookie to make it to the probowl? __________________ That got ugly fast

12-30-2009, 01:58 PM	#35
53Fan Franchise Player Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C. Posts: 7,570	Re: Redskins in 2010 Pro Bowl The Pro Bowl is a joke apparently. How could it be taken seriously? No Fletch...no credibility. __________________ Defense wins championships. Bring it!

12-30-2009, 01:59 PM	#36
CultBrennan59 Pro Bowl Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 6,526	Re: Redskins in 2010 Pro Bowl Fletcher's chances rest with Saints; Carter is 2nd alternate There is a chance that London Fletcher could play in his first Pro Bowl after all. Fletcher was named a first alternate to the NFC's team, which might not have meant a whole lot in past years. But this year, the Pro Bowl is being played one week before the Super Bowl, so any players who have a role in deciding the league's championship will sit out the all-star game. What does that mean for Fletcher? Well, if New Orleans reaches the Super Bowl, linebacker Jonathan Vilma would be unable to play in the Pro Bowl -- clearing a path for the first alternate. Fletcher has never played in the Pro Bowl but was a third alternate each of the past two seasons. He was also alternate in 2002, 2005 and 2006. Andre Carter has been chosen to the team as a second alternate. Minnesota's Jared Allen, Carolina's Julius Peppers and Philadelphia's Trent Cole were selected ahead of Carter to play defensive end for the NFC's team.

12-30-2009, 01:59 PM	#37
CultBrennan59 Pro Bowl Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 6,526	Re: Redskins in 2010 Pro Bowl ^^this is according to Jason Reid of the washington post. at least fletch is a first alternate

12-30-2009, 03:02 PM	#41
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: NY Age: 52 Posts: 99,516	Re: Redskins in 2010 Pro Bowl Let's hope the Saints go all the way so Fletcher can play. __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

12-30-2009, 03:32 PM	#42
12thMan MVP Join Date: May 2005 Location: washington, D.C. Posts: 11,460	Re: Redskins in 2010 Pro Bowl The reason Fletch didn't make this year is the reason he never makes it. He's not perceived to be a playmaker. Fletch is a solid linebacker who consistently accumulates good stats year after year. To be more specific, he's good in pass coverage but not great. Vilma, on the other hand, while he may not be as rounded as Fletcher is considered more of playmaker. Particularly in coverage and defending passes. I think Fletcher is derserving of a Pro Bowl nod this year, but it's obvious they're looking at something different when grading Fletcher.

12-30-2009, 03:53 PM	#43
sportscurmudgeon Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 3,159	Re: Redskins in 2010 Pro Bowl Congratulations to Brian Orakpo. __________________ The Sports Curmudgeon www.sportscurmudgeon.com But don't get me wrong, I love sports...

12-30-2009, 05:44 PM	#44
CRedskinsRule Living Legend Join Date: Aug 2008 Age: 57 Posts: 21,426	Re: Redskins in 2010 Pro Bowl Just wondering, if Orakpo had a sudden "injury" would that bring Fletch in to the Pro Bowl? Not saying he should could or would sit out his first appearance, but would his missing the game allow Fletch to make a PB appearance?

12-30-2009, 05:48 PM	#45
SouperMeister Playmaker Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Leesburg, VA Age: 60 Posts: 3,419	Re: Redskins in 2010 Pro Bowl I thought that Andre Carter had an equally strong case, but definite congratulations to Brian Orakpo.

Redskins in 2010 Pro Bowl

Locker Room Main Forum