![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 48
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
Quote:
Get ready for some differential calculus from GTripp how not only is this incorrect but that Reid + wet ham sandwich - the bite he takes out of it > Shanny + McNabb / Zorn's increased knowledge after watching Cooley's ankle surgery + a healthy sesamoid |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
Don't forget the T-Analysis and six sigma reports.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Fight for old DC!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aldie, VA
Age: 46
Posts: 4,101
|
Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
Quote:
LOL! Hilarious. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,570
|
Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
Quote:
Campbell + Zorn < Campbell + Shanahan The coaching changes and the improved o-line are gonna be the difference this year.
__________________
Defense wins championships. Bring it! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Fort Bliss, TX
Posts: 2,277
|
Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
-GTripp-
These columnists aren't the people I've been discussing takes on the trade with. They're just mainstream sources. For every columnist who doesn't like it for the Redskins, there are two who do. But I'm also not citing columnists as experts here. I'm just telling you that people that I have reached out to are "lukewarm" about what the Redskins are receiving. There's no anger: these are not Redskins fans. It's just being panned as more of the same from a franchise that has come to deliver it on a consistent basis. And I tend to agree.------------------------------------------- Dude, first off, let me say this. I love the passion. You are a fan, and that is great. Passion is great to see, whether u agree or not, Im sure you will be rootin for old #5 in Sept. whether JC has comparable stats or not. That said----- I think your anonymous "sources" are anonymous because they are f*ckin' made up, kinda like a 4 year olds make believe imaginary friend, only your "sources" spout football statistical nonsense that could be tilted to either side given the change of a variable or two. I think you are just full of it, and trying to make it seem like your knowledge is superior than all of ours because "YOU GOT THE INSIDE TRACK, dude.....". some of your posts and spouts have come off as plain foolish. I call BullShit. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 140
|
Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
SS also has more access to "film guys" than I do, so believe him when he says that there are people out there who do hardcore analysis and support the Redskins in this trade.
And believe me when I say that a lot of really smart people in the know have no idea what we are thinking.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 60
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 51
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
Good idea, thanks for starting this.
In a way, this move is somewhat similar to what we did after the 1998 season -- we sucked that year, brought in a fairly successful veteran QB in Brad Johnson then proceeded to win the division in '99. Hopefully history repeats. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 681
|
Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
I wonder if Hard Knocks is regretting not picking Washington this year?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 51
Posts: 2,841
|
Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
He can't be any worse than Jason Taylor?
Can he? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 37
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
Taylor started 8 games, so that's where the bar is set.
Shanahan>Blache
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,471
|
Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
I can't get over the idea of rooting for a guy that I have pulled against for the last 10 years. I have legitimate concerns about his short to intermediate accuracy, but I think that Shanahan's offense could be a very good fit, since it seems to favor those with a big arm, which McNabb has.
As much as I have previously disliked McNabb, i think i'm starting to warm to this considering he didn't pull a Favre and force his way out of town and he's done nothing but win with the Eagles. Assuming he's got 3-4 yrs in the tank, this could be a huge get for the Skins. But it's going to be weird seeing him in burgundy and gold.
__________________
"All natural institutions of churches, whether Jewish, Christian, or Turkish, appear to me no other than human inventions, set up to terrify and enslave mankind, and monopolize power and profit." Thomas Paine |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
I just e-mailed this link to the Eagles fan who claims they'll follow McNabb to Washington and has given up on Philly.
![]() Washington Redskins
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: McNabb a Redskin! (Part II)
How do we know the Ravens and Dolphins didn't also talk to the Eagles? I would guess that, based on how these things usually go, every team except maybe the Saints, Falcons, Colts, and Pats had some conversation with the Eagles. All teams talk all the time
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|