Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Handful of Owners Resisting Parameters of New Deal

Locker Room Main Forum


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-19-2011, 10:46 PM   #31
Lotus
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
Re: Handful of Owners Resisting Parameters of New Deal

Quote:
Originally Posted by FRPLG View Post
He's not tied to it in the way you're referring other than by the fact that it is relatively new for a stadium. It's only now getting into it's middle age period.

And the thing that is keeping him in the stadium more than anything is the implosion in the real estate market (since cities have figured out that stadiums are not the revenue generators they are made out to be). That land is worth a mint 10 years ago. Enough to build him a new stadium. Now...not so much.
I would add that once you own a stadium there is an incentive to stay there. It is economically intelligent to keep a car I own rather than always taking on new car payments. It behooves me to stay in a house I own rather than moving from new mortgage to new mortgage. Likewise, if you own Fedex, there is reason to stay rather than trying to finance a new stadium.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny
Lotus is offline  

Advertisements
Old 06-20-2011, 05:01 PM   #32
FRPLG
MVP
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
Re: Handful of Owners Resisting Parameters of New Deal

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus View Post
I would add that once you own a stadium there is an incentive to stay there. It is economically intelligent to keep a car I own rather than always taking on new car payments. It behooves me to stay in a house I own rather than moving from new mortgage to new mortgage. Likewise, if you own Fedex, there is reason to stay rather than trying to finance a new stadium.
And since they keep selling the games out despite a general sense amongst fans that the stadium is average and the experience lacking then why would he even be motivated to build a new stadium. The only thing I can think of that would motivate him is if he concludes the stadium is going to become a problem in terms of revenue generation and he'd like to head that off or just plain ego. I think he has a big ego...I don't think he'll shell out upwards of a billion dollars to staisfy it. The only thing he likes more than himself is money.
FRPLG is offline  
Old 06-20-2011, 05:07 PM   #33
Lotus
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
Re: Handful of Owners Resisting Parameters of New Deal

Quote:
Originally Posted by FRPLG View Post
And since they keep selling the games out despite a general sense amongst fans that the stadium is average and the experience lacking then why would he even be motivated to build a new stadium. The only thing I can think of that would motivate him is if he concludes the stadium is going to become a problem in terms of revenue generation and he'd like to head that off or just plain ego. I think he has a big ego...I don't think he'll shell out upwards of a billion dollars to staisfy it. The only thing he likes more than himself is money.
Excellent point.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny
Lotus is offline  
Old 06-20-2011, 06:02 PM   #34
Giantone
Gamebreaker
 
Giantone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 14,029
Re: Handful of Owners Resisting Parameters of New Deal

Quote:
Originally Posted by FRPLG View Post
And since they keep selling the games out .

Thing is they aren't,club seats haven't been totally sold out for over 10 years.
__________________
....DISCLAIMER: All of my posts/threads are my expressed typed opinion and the reader is not to assume these comments are absolute fact, law, or truth unless otherwise stated in said post/thread.
Giantone is offline  
Old 06-20-2011, 07:18 PM   #35
NC_Skins
Gamebreaker
 
NC_Skins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,494
Re: Handful of Owners Resisting Parameters of New Deal

Quote:
Originally Posted by Giantone View Post
Thing is they aren't,club seats haven't been totally sold out for over 10 years.
This is a huge reason why Dan might not want a new stadium at this particular time. The demand for high paying tickets, suites, and PSLs is probably at a all time low right now so trying to get people to fork over even more money wouldn't be a smart decision. The team would have to become competitive for some years before he could drum up the interests again to charge the type of fees he's going to want to charge for new stadium PSLs.
NC_Skins is online now  
Old 06-20-2011, 10:56 PM   #36
SkinzWin
Playmaker
 
SkinzWin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 3,543
Re: Handful of Owners Resisting Parameters of New Deal

Quote:
Originally Posted by FRPLG View Post
He's not tied to it in the way you're referring other than by the fact that it is relatively new for a stadium. It's only now getting into it's middle age period.

And the thing that is keeping him in the stadium more than anything is the implosion in the real estate market (since cities have figured out that stadiums are not the revenue generators they are made out to be). That land is worth a mint 10 years ago. Enough to build him a new stadium. Now...not so much.
Yes, but it is now also the oldest stadium in the NFC East.
__________________
Sean Taylor #21 a Redskin forever...

Team Heinicke Fan Club
punch it in - CEO
SkinzWin - President
FrenchSkin - VP of Global Operations
ODUsmitty - Director of Cheerleader Fulfillment
Meks - Director of Marketing
SkinzWin is offline  
Old 06-20-2011, 11:36 PM   #37
sportscurmudgeon
Playmaker
 
sportscurmudgeon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
Re: Handful of Owners Resisting Parameters of New Deal

Let us look back at how Fed Ex Field came into existence.

Jack Kent Cooke wanted to build a stadium and put his name on it - - not sell naming rights. He tried to get land and zoning changes through the District government for about ten years offering a deal that he would pay for the stadium if they gave him the land and upgraded the road access to the stadium. The DC government never got around to doing anything thinking that he had nowhere else to go but to stay in RFK Stadium. [To those who think FedEx is old and out of date, you should have seen RFK...]

Cooke tried to get a deal done for a site in Alexandria VA but was stopped by a grass roots uprising there. He also looked at a site in Laurel MD; I do not recall what the stumbling block to construction there was.

After years of trying to get Cooke's attention, PG County contacted him at the height of his frustration. He was not getting any younger and if he was going to see his new stadium with his name on it before he croaked, he had to get moving.

Cooke and PG County came to a deal for land and road access; Cooke would build the stadium and he promised that the Redskins would play in that stadium or another stadium in PG County for a specified period of time. [I think that period of time was 30 years meaning the Redskins are "locked into" playing in PG County until about 2025 without a whole lot of legal wrangling.]

Because Cooke was old and wanted to see his stadium up and running before he died, Jack Kent Cooke Stadium was built fast and lots of corners were cut in order to get the stadium done as soon as possible. Cooke also wanted his stadium to be the biggest in the NFL so they built it big.

But the combination of "big" with "fast construction to get the job done ASAP" along with meager road access made Jack Kent Cooke Stadium a disappointing venue the day it opened. There have been changes to the stadium in the Danny Boy era, but adding amenities to Fed Ex Field is more like putting lipstick on a pig than anything else.

As with the ESPN ranking of the Redskins franchise almost at the bottom of the list for sports franchises, FedEx Field is indeed one of the worst stadium experiences in the NFL. Yes, there are worse; the stadiums in Oakland, New Orleans, Buffalo and Minnesota are more than bleak. But Fed Ex Field is clearly in the bottom 25% of the NFL stadiums and the likelihood that will change significantly in the next 5-10 years is small.
__________________
The Sports Curmudgeon
www.sportscurmudgeon.com
But don't get me wrong, I love sports...
sportscurmudgeon is offline  
Old 06-21-2011, 12:40 AM   #38
hooskins
Most Interesting Man in the World
 
hooskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 8,606
Re: Handful of Owners Resisting Parameters of New Deal

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinzWin View Post
Yes, but it is now also the oldest stadium in the NFC East.
You can't always be the newest all the time. What were the respective ages of all the other NFC East stadiums before they upgraded?

Exactly...
__________________
Vacancy
hooskins is offline  
Old 06-21-2011, 04:38 AM   #39
Giantone
Gamebreaker
 
Giantone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 14,029
Re: Handful of Owners Resisting Parameters of New Deal

Quote:
Originally Posted by hooskins View Post
You can't always be the newest all the time. What were the respective ages of all the other NFC East stadiums before they upgraded?

Exactly...
Newest isn't always the best thing to be. The "NEW MEADOWLANDS" ...in my opinion stinks,concourse is three times as wide(good thing),bathrooms half the size and not as many,standing room party areas......suck ,more drunks to deal with that distract from the game.
Old Giants stadium was a great place to watch a game ,yet the owners now will pocket more money with this place.....hell with the fan.
__________________
....DISCLAIMER: All of my posts/threads are my expressed typed opinion and the reader is not to assume these comments are absolute fact, law, or truth unless otherwise stated in said post/thread.
Giantone is offline  
Old 06-21-2011, 10:53 AM   #40
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
Re: Handful of Owners Resisting Parameters of New Deal

Gotta admit, Lincoln Financial Field is a VERY NICE facility. Was there a couple of weekends ago for a Monster Jam event.

The people in it however...
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline  
Old 06-21-2011, 02:06 PM   #41
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,327
Re: Handful of Owners Resisting Parameters of New Deal

Quote:
Originally Posted by sportscurmudgeon View Post
Let us look back at how Fed Ex Field came into existence.

Jack Kent Cooke wanted to build a stadium and put his name on it - - not sell naming rights. He tried to get land and zoning changes through the District government for about ten years offering a deal that he would pay for the stadium if they gave him the land and upgraded the road access to the stadium. The DC government never got around to doing anything thinking that he had nowhere else to go but to stay in RFK Stadium. [To those who think FedEx is old and out of date, you should have seen RFK...]

Cooke tried to get a deal done for a site in Alexandria VA but was stopped by a grass roots uprising there. He also looked at a site in Laurel MD; I do not recall what the stumbling block to construction there was.

After years of trying to get Cooke's attention, PG County contacted him at the height of his frustration. He was not getting any younger and if he was going to see his new stadium with his name on it before he croaked, he had to get moving.

Cooke and PG County came to a deal for land and road access; Cooke would build the stadium and he promised that the Redskins would play in that stadium or another stadium in PG County for a specified period of time. [I think that period of time was 30 years meaning the Redskins are "locked into" playing in PG County until about 2025 without a whole lot of legal wrangling.]

Because Cooke was old and wanted to see his stadium up and running before he died, Jack Kent Cooke Stadium was built fast and lots of corners were cut in order to get the stadium done as soon as possible. Cooke also wanted his stadium to be the biggest in the NFL so they built it big.

But the combination of "big" with "fast construction to get the job done ASAP" along with meager road access made Jack Kent Cooke Stadium a disappointing venue the day it opened. There have been changes to the stadium in the Danny Boy era, but adding amenities to Fed Ex Field is more like putting lipstick on a pig than anything else.

As with the ESPN ranking of the Redskins franchise almost at the bottom of the list for sports franchises, FedEx Field is indeed one of the worst stadium experiences in the NFL. Yes, there are worse; the stadiums in Oakland, New Orleans, Buffalo and Minnesota are more than bleak. But Fed Ex Field is clearly in the bottom 25% of the NFL stadiums and the likelihood that will change significantly in the next 5-10 years is small.
Kinda off topic but I wonder why Cooke was so hard pressed for a new staduim? He knew he wasn't going to be around for many more years and he knew he wasn't leaving the team to his son John.
skinsfan69 is online now  
Old 06-21-2011, 02:22 PM   #42
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Handful of Owners Resisting Parameters of New Deal

Lockout: Sources reveal details of proposed NFL CBA - ESPN
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline  
Old 06-21-2011, 02:33 PM   #43
skinsfaninok
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 38
Posts: 36,149
Re: Handful of Owners Resisting Parameters of New Deal

Lockout: Sources reveal details of proposed NFL CBA - ESPN
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.”
― Nick Saban
skinsfaninok is offline  
Old 06-21-2011, 02:33 PM   #44
skinsfaninok
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 38
Posts: 36,149
Re: Handful of Owners Resisting Parameters of New Deal

lol Damn SS almost same time
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.”
― Nick Saban
skinsfaninok is offline  
Old 06-21-2011, 03:06 PM   #45
FRPLG
MVP
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
Re: Handful of Owners Resisting Parameters of New Deal

If the low rev teams can't keep up then they need to sell their team and let it move where it can work in my opinion. Sorry but Ralph Wilson and Mike Brown do the bare minimum to market their team and generate revenue and I don't see why the other owners, the players or fans should suffer the loss of football because they are asshats. Let's remember...Mike Brown is no "Captain of Industry" he inherited the team and Wilson has run a virtual sweatshop for decades. Sorry but when the other 80% of the league is raking in cash and trying to advance the product and barnd I have no sympathy for those that are mucking it all up by half-assing it.
FRPLG is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.61191 seconds with 10 queries