![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
|
Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)
I'm enjoying the other teams stains of bad play.
My glass is half full. HTTR!
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,307
|
Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)
Redzone and 3rd down were kinda poor today. Last week they were pretty solid. I like to see us run the ball more effectively in both these situations.
Gano...you kicked the game winner, but that kick outta bounds to start the 2nd half is just effing horrible. Need to see more consistency. Injuries in the secondary are becoming a real bitch now. Wilson, Laron, Barnes need to get healthy. Other than that, not bad. Its not really individuals, but situational stuff that needs to improve.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)
Impatient group here I see. Couldn't wait a little while for Scud and I to start our threads
Mooby...I'm not mad. I just thought I'd have a little fun with you. Our stealth mods were watching the apparent coup being secretly organized in the gameday thread...they're always watching
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Most Interesting Man in the World
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 39
Posts: 8,606
|
Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)
Quote:
Never! Posters unite!
__________________
Vacancy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Fire Bruce NOW
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)
Mods are locked out until they agree to accept only 48% of revenues.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,596
|
Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)
Quote:
__________________
Hail to the Football Team |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
|
Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)
It's a matter of who I like more, Dirtbag359 or SmootSmack. I can't decide.
__________________
Analysis using datasets (aka stats) is an attempt at reverse-engineering a player's "goodness". Virtuosity remembered, douchebaggery forgotten. The ideal character profile shoved down modern Western men and women's throats is Don Juan. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
|
You know who was a big dud today? Whoever thought it was a good idea to leave 6'8" Calais Campbell unblocked on the blocked field goal.
Sent from my Samsung Epic 4G.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)
Smackdown on Haslett. I think our defensive scheme was lackluster in the 2nd half. Kolb had a terrible 1st half and our secondary played relatively well early in the game. We should have come out (defensively) in the 3rd quarter expecting them to try to pound the pigskin w/ Wells, as they did. We should have put more guys in the box and not let them get anything going. Something is up w/ the right side defensively as most of the big gains on the ground seem to go there. Orakpo struggling in run defense/containment? Doughty? Hard for me to say.
Also within the defense Cofield looked very average today i.e. no impact out there. Why didn't Nield get more action today?
__________________
24-34 |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
|
Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)
Quote:
Although NTs are not supposed to be flashy on a 3-4, I do agree with you that Cofield has looked very average. I'd be curious to see what the folks that review the games can say about his play. I just hated seeing getting manhandled by the Giants' rookie center last week.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Age: 37
Posts: 1,092
|
Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)
Quote:
I agree completely, sometimes you gotta give credit to the other teams play caller.
__________________
doing it all in the spirit of the salary cap! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)
Quote:
In short, we had different DL personnel in the game throughout the second half, and so we struggled to make the adjustment to the Cards running so many draws. Plus, it didn't help that Rocky got blocked out of one play by a receiver and ran past the back another time. It was nice that the Cardinals found a rushing play that worked for them, but the biggest actual (sustainable) difference in the second half was the injuries in our secondary and the matchups the Cards were able to win on the outside. They had the Fitzgerald-Hall matchup there all day, but it took considerable injury and short passing for them to set up that double move. Give them credit on that one: they saved it for a good time, and it really should have been a clinching TD. We were lucky to escape with a win.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)
Quote:
The truth, in my opinion, is because the onus was on the Cardinals offense to change its approach, the Redskins needed to have more than a 3 point lead at half and kicking off based on the way they dominated. It's too easy to go in at half and find one thing about the defense you can attack. The Cardinals did win the halftime adjustments, but that's to be expected when the Redskins were utterly schematically dominant in the first half. The only place to go for the Cards coaches was up, despite the score.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,526
|
Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)
Quote:
__________________
"Anyones better than Madieu Williams" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Martinsburg, WV
Posts: 3,881
|
Re: Smoot Doesn't Lay The Smack Down (Mooby Does) (Redskins V. Cardinals)
If we stall out in the redzone against Dallas, we will get slaughtered. We wont be able to keep up with their offense.
__________________
I need something to cheer about Redskin Fan since '88 Be friends on Twitter! @thecasualhero |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|