Official Andrew Luck Thread

NM Redskin · 10-28-2011, 04:32 PM

SmootSmack · 10-28-2011, 04:54 PM

I agree that about Moore and Foles. My guess is Tanneyhill would mean they have confidence in Beck for the next two to three years. Good for them, I suppose. I'd be down for going to right Moore to kick off the 2012 season

CultBrennan59 · 10-28-2011, 11:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NM Redskin

he's playing against SMU. Until SMU is known for their defense I'm not gonna bother watching more.

sdskinsfan2001 · 10-29-2011, 12:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

That's terrible.

I believe the correct spelling is That's Turrribbbble.

skins89moss · 10-29-2011, 05:38 AM

We won't suck enough to get Luck and forget about trading to get him. I don't won to mortage the farm to get Luck. As for Kellen Moore from Boise St. he looks great in the college game but he does not play in a strong conference. He is also on the short side for a NFL QB. We have to get a QB in the 2012 draft and I'm not talking about a backup QB we need a bona fide starter. We better do our home work for this draft on the QB's.

SBXVII · 10-29-2011, 10:46 AM

I really can't believe we have another thread on this guy.

Personally I think he's over rated. There will be other teams who will finish worse then the Skins who will have a better chance of getting him. and lastly... I think he did want to come out last year but knew his ole ball coach would not be able to get him in San Fran so he decided to stay in college. I'd put good money (if I had it) on the table that he comes out this year and San Fran makes a play for him. A big play. I think if San Fran can't move up to get him then they will offer whoever picks him a couple of players and a couple of picks just to trade for him.

So to me .... Luck is a moot issue. Who's the next best? of course that would fit in this system.

SFREDSKIN · 10-30-2011, 01:15 AM

Anybody watch the game tonight? What a game!! Both QB's looked great especially Luck, Barkley held his own.

CultBrennan59 · 10-30-2011, 04:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

Anybody watch the game tonight? What a game!! Both QB's looked great especially Luck, Barkley held his own.

Matt Barkley + Robert Woods = Matt Leinart + DeWayne Jarrett

Translation. I don't want him or Woods

Big C · 10-30-2011, 09:37 AM

tannehill is a good shout. hes big and mobile (he was a wide receiver at tamu too)

Lotus · 10-30-2011, 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Big C

tannehill is a good shout. hes big and mobile (he was a wide receiver at tamu too)

Yeah, there's a lot to like about Tannehill. Lack of experience is a concern. But I wouldn't mind if we got him in a later round.

CultBrennan59 · 10-30-2011, 01:41 PM

Drafting Tannehill would set us back 5 years.

Lotus · 10-30-2011, 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CultBrennan59

Drafting Tannehill would set us back 5 years.

Why?

Landry44 · 10-30-2011, 03:37 PM

Andrew Luck is an incredible qb. However, he's not the only great qb in this draft. I think it's 6 guys that's could be drafted in the first round. You have Landry Jones, Matt Barkley, RG3, Nick Foles, and Ryan Tannehill. Now I'm not sold all of these guys but I would much rather draft one of them before I trade away this draft and the next for Luck.

1) Landry Jones has great size, accuracy, good arm strength, and decent mobility. He's a really good qb. I think he would fit in well here like most of the qbs in this draft. My only problem with Jones is that he's inconsistent at times.

2) Matt Barkley isn't great at anything but he's solid at everything. He has average size, good arm strength, good accuracy, good decision making, and good mobility. When I look at this kid play I see a guy who can consistently make all of the throws. He will be a good qb at he next level in my opinion. I think he's a better fit for our offense than Landry Jones, but not as good as RG3 or Tannehill.

3)RG3 is the truth. I really, really do like this kid. He has average size, great accuracy, good arm strength, great decision making, and great mobility. I think that this kid is one of the best players in this draft. Out of all the qbs he fits our system better than any of them. His team has been overwhelmed this year at times, but he still performs at a high level. Even yesterday he team was completely outmatched on both sides of the ball and he stilll manage to pass over four hundred yards while completing 66% of his passes. It wasn't a great day but any means but it showed just how good of a passer he is. When he gets in the nfl and gets it. This kid is a probowl qb. I just don't think he's ready to start right away. He needs a year to really learn the our system.

4) Nick Foles is guy I like a lot. He has great size, great accuracy, good arm strength, and decent mobility. He's shown the ability to carry his team on his back. He would be a good pick for us at qb. The only thing is he will not be ready to start day one.

5) Ryan Tannehill is a interesting guy. I'm not sold on him like the first 4 prospects, but I think this guy has a lot of physical tools. I think he's good size, good accuracy, great mobility, and good decision making. I don't want us to draft him but he is very talented. He would fit in here because of his mobility and accuracy. I just think it's better options in this draft.

6) I really do like Kellen Moore. He's accuracy, smart, and a true leader. If he was a few inches taller and had a little more arm strength he would be a top 5 pick. This guy is an amazing player. I hope he gets a shot somewhere. I wouldn't be against the SKins drafting him as long as it's in the mid rounds.

In my opinion there are a lot of great options for us at qb. There is no reason for us to give up everything for Andrew Luck when we got like 5 guys that could come in and light it up in our offense. We have multiple needs on both the defense and offensive side of the ball. If we don't get the number one pick I would say Luck is out of the question. I would love to have him, but not at the price that it's going to take to get him.

musicmaster45 · 10-30-2011, 03:40 PM

I haven't sen tannehill. Moore and RGIII are good for us though because they are so consistently good and accurate. They both understand the game well and use that to their advantage. Hope we pick them up.

Landry44 · 10-30-2011, 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lotus

Yeah, there's a lot to like about Tannehill. Lack of experience is a concern. But I wouldn't mind if we got him in a later round.

There is a lot to like about him. I'm just not sold on him. I would much rather draft Kellen Moore before I draft Tannehill.

10-28-2011, 04:32 PM	#31
NM Redskin The Starter Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: New Mexico Posts: 1,014	Re: Official Andrew Luck Thread __________________ Despite my solid 40 time and great intangibles I went undrafted AGAIN!

10-28-2011, 04:54 PM	#32
SmootSmack Uncle Phil Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 45,256	Re: Official Andrew Luck Thread I agree that about Moore and Foles. My guess is Tanneyhill would mean they have confidence in Beck for the next two to three years. Good for them, I suppose. I'd be down for going to right Moore to kick off the 2012 season __________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You

10-29-2011, 05:38 AM	#35
skins89moss Playmaker Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Las Vegas Posts: 3,634	Re: Official Andrew Luck Thread We won't suck enough to get Luck and forget about trading to get him. I don't won to mortage the farm to get Luck. As for Kellen Moore from Boise St. he looks great in the college game but he does not play in a strong conference. He is also on the short side for a NFL QB. We have to get a QB in the 2012 draft and I'm not talking about a backup QB we need a bona fide starter. We better do our home work for this draft on the QB's. __________________ www.islandstyleflowers.com Home of the Hawaiian Foam Flowers and Kukui Nut Leis. Great selections and best prices. Redskins Fan Since 1972

10-29-2011, 10:46 AM	#36
SBXVII Franchise Player Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Virginia Posts: 7,766	Re: Official Andrew Luck Thread I really can't believe we have another thread on this guy. Personally I think he's over rated. There will be other teams who will finish worse then the Skins who will have a better chance of getting him. and lastly... I think he did want to come out last year but knew his ole ball coach would not be able to get him in San Fran so he decided to stay in college. I'd put good money (if I had it) on the table that he comes out this year and San Fran makes a play for him. A big play. I think if San Fran can't move up to get him then they will offer whoever picks him a couple of players and a couple of picks just to trade for him. So to me .... Luck is a moot issue. Who's the next best? of course that would fit in this system.

10-30-2011, 01:15 AM	#37
SFREDSKIN Living Legend Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Pacifica, CA Posts: 15,164	Re: Official Andrew Luck Thread Anybody watch the game tonight? What a game!! Both QB's looked great especially Luck, Barkley held his own. __________________ Joe Gibbs- The best coach of all time, Lombardi trophy should be renamed Gibbs. Art Monk- Art was like an OL playing WR, doing the dirty work and not getting the glory. Darrell Green- Best DB ever. Purveyor of fine Filth

10-30-2011, 09:37 AM	#39
Big C Mr. Brightside Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Leesburg, VA Age: 38 Posts: 4,453	Re: Official Andrew Luck Thread tannehill is a good shout. hes big and mobile (he was a wide receiver at tamu too) __________________ "I don't care what nobody say I'm a be me, stay hood stay real, cause I'm out here grindin'" -Joe Gibbs Last edited by Big C; 10-30-2011 at 09:41 AM.

10-30-2011, 01:41 PM	#41
CultBrennan59 Pro Bowl Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 6,526	Re: Official Andrew Luck Thread Drafting Tannehill would set us back 5 years. __________________ "Anyones better than Madieu Williams"

10-30-2011, 03:37 PM	#43
Landry44 Registered User Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 299	Re: Official Andrew Luck Thread Andrew Luck is an incredible qb. However, he's not the only great qb in this draft. I think it's 6 guys that's could be drafted in the first round. You have Landry Jones, Matt Barkley, RG3, Nick Foles, and Ryan Tannehill. Now I'm not sold all of these guys but I would much rather draft one of them before I trade away this draft and the next for Luck. 1) Landry Jones has great size, accuracy, good arm strength, and decent mobility. He's a really good qb. I think he would fit in well here like most of the qbs in this draft. My only problem with Jones is that he's inconsistent at times. 2) Matt Barkley isn't great at anything but he's solid at everything. He has average size, good arm strength, good accuracy, good decision making, and good mobility. When I look at this kid play I see a guy who can consistently make all of the throws. He will be a good qb at he next level in my opinion. I think he's a better fit for our offense than Landry Jones, but not as good as RG3 or Tannehill. 3)RG3 is the truth. I really, really do like this kid. He has average size, great accuracy, good arm strength, great decision making, and great mobility. I think that this kid is one of the best players in this draft. Out of all the qbs he fits our system better than any of them. His team has been overwhelmed this year at times, but he still performs at a high level. Even yesterday he team was completely outmatched on both sides of the ball and he stilll manage to pass over four hundred yards while completing 66% of his passes. It wasn't a great day but any means but it showed just how good of a passer he is. When he gets in the nfl and gets it. This kid is a probowl qb. I just don't think he's ready to start right away. He needs a year to really learn the our system. 4) Nick Foles is guy I like a lot. He has great size, great accuracy, good arm strength, and decent mobility. He's shown the ability to carry his team on his back. He would be a good pick for us at qb. The only thing is he will not be ready to start day one. 5) Ryan Tannehill is a interesting guy. I'm not sold on him like the first 4 prospects, but I think this guy has a lot of physical tools. I think he's good size, good accuracy, great mobility, and good decision making. I don't want us to draft him but he is very talented. He would fit in here because of his mobility and accuracy. I just think it's better options in this draft. 6) I really do like Kellen Moore. He's accuracy, smart, and a true leader. If he was a few inches taller and had a little more arm strength he would be a top 5 pick. This guy is an amazing player. I hope he gets a shot somewhere. I wouldn't be against the SKins drafting him as long as it's in the mid rounds. In my opinion there are a lot of great options for us at qb. There is no reason for us to give up everything for Andrew Luck when we got like 5 guys that could come in and light it up in our offense. We have multiple needs on both the defense and offensive side of the ball. If we don't get the number one pick I would say Luck is out of the question. I would love to have him, but not at the price that it's going to take to get him.

10-30-2011, 03:40 PM	#44
musicmaster45 Special Teams Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: Colorado Posts: 374	Re: Official Andrew Luck Thread I haven't sen tannehill. Moore and RGIII are good for us though because they are so consistently good and accurate. They both understand the game well and use that to their advantage. Hope we pick them up. __________________ Shanahann loves the colleges i do...... Purdue and Nebraska FTW!!!!

Official Andrew Luck Thread

Locker Room Main Forum