|
|
|
10-03-2012, 08:20 PM
|
#1 | |
|
Hail Raiser
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,038
|
Re: Should Billy Cundiff still be cut!
Quote:
|
|
|
|
10-02-2012, 10:57 AM
|
#2 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 3,109
|
Re: Should Billy Cundiff still be cut!
Should this thread title have a question mark at the end of it!
|
|
|
|
10-02-2012, 11:39 AM
|
#3 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,526
|
Re: Should Billy Cundiff still be cut!
Cundiff hopefully just had one bad game. However if he misses more than 1 kick next game. His ass is grass, kick him out of here!
__________________
"Anyones better than Madieu Williams" |
|
|
|
10-02-2012, 11:59 AM
|
#4 |
|
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: Should Billy Cundiff still be cut!
I don't know that either Rackers or Gano is an upgrade or downgrade over Cundiff. They are all about the same despite having different strengths/weaknesses.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
|
|
|
10-02-2012, 12:21 PM
|
#5 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,230
|
Re: Should Billy Cundiff still be cut!
as a kicker, i say keep him. as a redskins fan, i say keep him.
if he wets the top bunk again, then start sniffing around the hamper for the cleanest dirty shirt. on a gano note, was he ever seen practicing kicking over a "wall"? something like 12 ft high, about 8 yds in front of him. his trajectory has room for improvement. he did nail that 59 yarder once upon a time
__________________
9 21 28 33 42 43 44 49 65 81 |
|
|
|
10-02-2012, 12:42 PM
|
#6 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Should Billy Cundiff still be cut!
I'm of the mindset that if you were going to cut him after one poor game (in which he made the winning kick anyway) then you shouldn't have signed him in the first place. There's a fine line between arrogance and loyalty. On the one hand, you could say Shanahan is being arrogant. On the other you could say Shanahan needs to show his players he's loyal to them even through mistakes.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You Last edited by SmootSmack; 10-02-2012 at 12:48 PM. |
|
|
|
10-02-2012, 12:44 PM
|
#7 |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,307
|
Re: Should Billy Cundiff still be cut!
Lovin Cundiff work on kickoffs. Gano had multiple kicks out of bounds resulting in the starting spot of the 40 last year, thats insane. Cundiff getting more touchbacks as well.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
|
|
|
10-02-2012, 12:54 PM
|
#8 |
|
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,737
|
Re: Should Billy Cundiff still be cut!
Debating whether to have Gano, Rackers, or Cundiff on your team is like debating on which flavor of turd you want to eat. Chocolate, Strawberry, or Raspberry. Does it matter? It's still a turd and tough to stomach.
__________________
"So let me get this straight. We have the event of the year on TV with millions watching around the world... and people want a punt, pass, and kick competition to be the halftime entertainment?? Folks, don't quit your day jobs."- Matty |
|
|
|
10-02-2012, 01:25 PM
|
#9 | |
|
JUST LIVIN
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: houston,tx
Age: 64
Posts: 4,935
|
Re: Should Billy Cundiff still be cut!
Quote:
 I dont see why people are still giving love to Gano {not you} but Rackers cant get any? From everything I read in preseason and training camp,Rackers was outkicking Gano,but then they cut Rackers? Looking at fg percentage,Rackers is clearly above the other 2,especially over the last 3 yrs Neil Rackers NFL Football Statistics - Pro-Football-Reference.com Billy Cundiff NFL Football Statistics - Pro-Football-Reference.com Graham Gano NFL Football Statistics - Pro-Football-Reference.com
__________________
Make The Redskins Great Again |
|
|
|
|
10-02-2012, 01:59 PM
|
#10 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: Should Billy Cundiff still be cut!
Quote:
__________________
24-34 |
|
|
|
|
10-02-2012, 02:01 PM
|
#11 | |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,307
|
Re: Should Billy Cundiff still be cut!
Quote:
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
|
|
|
|
10-02-2012, 02:02 PM
|
#12 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: Should Billy Cundiff still be cut!
Quote:
__________________
24-34 |
|
|
|
|
10-02-2012, 02:49 PM
|
#13 | |
|
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,737
|
Re: Should Billy Cundiff still be cut!
Quote:
__________________
"So let me get this straight. We have the event of the year on TV with millions watching around the world... and people want a punt, pass, and kick competition to be the halftime entertainment?? Folks, don't quit your day jobs."- Matty |
|
|
|
|
10-02-2012, 02:55 PM
|
#14 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,066
|
Re: Should Billy Cundiff still be cut!
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
10-02-2012, 01:00 PM
|
#15 |
|
Hail Raiser
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,038
|
Re: Should Billy Cundiff still be cut!
I don't see arrogance in sticking with Cundiff. Is it really good football sense to cut your kicker when there aren't any better options out there? What do you do... bring back Gano and cut him when he goes 1/4?
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
