12-06-2012, 01:18 PM | #31 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,281
|
Re: Replacing the KO
Quote:
|
|
Advertisements |
12-06-2012, 01:27 PM | #32 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: Replacing the KO
Quote:
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
|
12-06-2012, 01:34 PM | #33 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: RatherbeinDC, TX
Posts: 3,059
|
Re: Replacing the KO
Im for replacing the Commercial. I really love it when there is like 50 seconds left on a change of possession and they break.
__________________
Lafayette, we're here. HTTR. You wern't a bunch of losers on 10-27-14. |
12-06-2012, 01:36 PM | #34 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: Replacing the KO
MNF is the worst even though I don't think they actually slow the game down any. It just seems weird when they keep playing 30 second commercials at the end of games over and over as a team calls its timeouts. The other networks don't do that.
|
12-06-2012, 01:46 PM | #35 |
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,504
|
Re: Replacing the KO
Cant get rid of Kickoffs. Goodell thinks this is a good idea for player safety from Schiano but Schiano is the same guy wants to tackle a kneeling QB? Smh at Goodell for the millionith time
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
12-06-2012, 01:55 PM | #36 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: I'm in LA, trick!
Posts: 8,700
|
Re: Replacing the KO
|
12-06-2012, 01:57 PM | #37 |
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,504
|
Re: Replacing the KO
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
12-06-2012, 02:10 PM | #38 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Jersey
Age: 39
Posts: 5,648
|
Re: Replacing the KO
No, it isnt, yet i still dont see that big of a gap when it comes down to the hits returners take either scenario ... blocking and people getting cut low is an obvious KO risk along with blind side hits, but punts also carry those type hits ... its a difference, but in my opiniin the gap isnt that big to make such a deal out of kickoffs and assume punts are just fine and dandy
__________________
R.I.P #21SEAN TAYLOR
|
12-06-2012, 02:56 PM | #39 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The Fortune Teller
Posts: 2,512
|
Re: Replacing the KO
This would give Shanny a legitimate out on his (not going so good) Brandon Banks project.
|
12-06-2012, 03:12 PM | #40 |
Serenity Now
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,008
|
Re: Replacing the KO
What about Schiano's proposed "zero blitz on kneel down plays"?
|
12-06-2012, 03:30 PM | #41 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
|
Re: Replacing the KO
Quote:
|
|
12-06-2012, 03:30 PM | #42 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
|
Re: Replacing the KO
I hate that crap. Bush league.
|
12-06-2012, 03:41 PM | #43 |
Serenity Now
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,008
|
Re: Replacing the KO
I think they should go the other route and get rid of the fair catch on punts. Remember this sicko??
|
12-06-2012, 04:44 PM | #44 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 40
Posts: 3,109
|
Re: Replacing the KO
I keep going back and forth on how I feel about this, but I think my main is concern is this: If we're taking kickoffs out of the game because they're the most dangerous play in the game, how long before we remove the next most dangerous play in the game?
I mean, let's say this actually happens and we replace kickoffs with punts. Then, after a while, the league starts to notice that more guys are being carted off from injuries during punts. Are we then going to eliminate punts and arbitrarily place the ball at the 20? If so, why don't we just do that now, if we're getting rid of the kickoff? Also, what if this change makes team change their punt return formations? What if, a head coach says, "You know what, having all of my guys on the line for a punt doesn't make much sense, why don't we start dropping them back?...I can still keep a bunch of guys within 10-15 yards of the ball in case of a fake, but I'm not going to try to block their kickoff." Now, we're right back in the same position of guys getting a 10-20 yard head start before collisions start to occur. Basically, my thinking is, if you're getting rid of kickoffs, you should probably be prepared for punts to also go by the way side. So, I don't think this solution is particularly viable since it will just replace "the most dangerous play in the game" with "the most dangerous play in the game." The only way I really see this working, from a safety standpoint, is if you start to create rules for punt return formations. If you're going to do that, why not just mandate that a return team must have X number of plays within Y yards of the ball on kickoffs and avoid the big collisions that way? |
12-06-2012, 04:51 PM | #45 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 60
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: Replacing the KO
Quote:
|
|
|
|