PrismmmMMMMmmmm, good! NOT!

[RedskinRat]

ZDNet Article

Editor's note: The following article should be treated as strictly hypothetical. It has been editorialized to simplify the content in certain areas, while maintaining as much technical detail as we can offer. Companies named in this article have been publicly disclosed, or used in example only. This piece should not be taken necessarily as fact but as a working theory that portrays only one possible implementation of the U.S. National Security Agency's PRISM program as it may exist today. Several ZDNet writers contributed to this report.

[RedskinRat]

Denny's knows what you're craving before they do. on Twitpic

[SmootSmack]

Starts here:

http://www.thewarpath.net/debating-w...tml#post919796

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Starts here:

http://www.thewarpath.net/debating-w...tml#post919796

I figured the robot judge jury thing is what he is referring to, but data collection like the NSA issue is a far cry from having a computerized judicial system. I doubt anyone questions that the government could collect and computerize tons of information.

[RedskinRat]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

I figured the robot judge jury thing is what he is referring to, but data collection like the NSA issue is a far cry from having a computerized judicial system. I doubt anyone questions that the government could collect and computerize tons of information.

It was a thread where I made a statement about the impending Singularity, someone said it wasn't possible as they were an Admin on a network with SQL and I laughed at them. I know that doesn't narrow it down as mocking is my default position.

Not that important as I make outlandish statements all the time, I'm surprised anyone reads anything I post.

[NC_Skins]

Originally Posted by RedskinRat

It was a thread where I made a statement about the impending Singularity, someone said it wasn't possible as they were an Admin on a network with SQL and I laughed at them. I know that doesn't narrow it down as mocking is my default position.

I don't think it was on this forum my friend.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

I figured the robot judge jury thing is what he is referring to, but data collection like the NSA issue is a far cry from having a computerized judicial system. I doubt anyone questions that the government could collect and computerize tons of information.

I think it started with the whole judicial system and went onto data collection.

Who knows. Who cares

[MTK]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

I think it started with the whole judicial system and went onto data collection.

Who knows. Who cares

truth

[JoeRedskin]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

I think it started with the whole judicial system and went onto data collection.

Who knows. Who cares

I CARE!! It's the offseason and, apparently, it's either this or Tebow. Delving into the validity of a semi-tangential comment in an obscure parking lot thread is emminently more interesting than discussing the possibility of a marginal player making the roster as 3rd QB on a team I don't particularly like.

It's been said before and will again ad nauseum in the next 6 weeks: I HATE THE OFFSEASON.

[JoeRedskin]

^^ When I say it carries a lot of weight, I mean in legal precedence. The Judicial branch give great deference to excutive branch's assertions that public security required certain actions. Particularly when the legislative branch created laws which ostensibly permit the executive to take the actions under scrutiny.

[firstdown]

HMMMMMMMMM

Maxine Waters Confirms "Big Brother" Database...

[JoeRedskin]

Originally Posted by RedskinRat

Too lazy or stupid. Please refer to Idiocracy.

Wow RR. We are agreeing all over the place. It MUST be the apocalypse.

[RedskinRat]

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

Wow RR. We are agreeing all over the place. It MUST be the apocalypse.

Yeah, I know. I feel the kind of 'dirty' a shower can't help.

[NC_Skins]

Originally Posted by Giantone

I said I would take the word of the man that runs NSA over Edward Snowden , a traitor who's just looking for fame.

No offense, but that much like sounds like the ramblings of these jerkoffs.


NSA leak: Obama under pressure as Sen. Dianne Feinstein denounces Edward Snowden’s ‘act of treason’ | The Raw Story




Let's recap what Biden had to say about a spying President.




Since you think all this survelliance "saves lives", let me throw this information out there.

The Dirty Little Secret About Mass Surveillance: It Doesn’t Keep Us Safe | Washington's Blog

Binney – a 32-year National Security Agency veteran – is the former head of the NSA’s global digital data gathering program, and a very highly-regarded cryptographer.

Binney told Daily Caller yesterday that the spying “dragnet” being carried out by the government is useless:

Since you'll take the word of guys in the upper levels of the NSA, how about you take this guys word. The word of a guy that used to run the program.

[FRPLG]

Originally Posted by NC_Skins

No offense, but that much like sounds like the ramblings of these jerkoffs.


NSA leak: Obama under pressure as Sen. Dianne Feinstein denounces Edward Snowden’s ‘act of treason’ | The Raw Story




Let's recap what Biden had to say about a spying President.




Since you think all this survelliance "saves lives", let me throw this information out there.

The Dirty Little Secret About Mass Surveillance: It Doesn’t Keep Us Safe | Washington's Blog




Since you'll take the word of guys in the upper levels of the NSA, how about you take this guys word. The word of a guy that used to run the program.

Right...this is being (and has been for years now) extraordinarily politicized. The reports earlier in the week about Democrats being in favor of this surveillance under Obama while be staunchly against it under Bush prove so. Of course those reports often left out the part about the opposite being true too. Republicans loved it under Bush but not so much under Obama.