|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-18-2005, 03:28 PM | #31 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 53
Posts: 2,665
|
Re: smoot's ranking
Quote:
As for Smoot being overrated. I say Smoot is underrated and Bailey is over rated. |
|
Advertisements |
03-18-2005, 03:29 PM | #32 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,569
|
Re: smoot's ranking
Quote:
Like him or not he was one of the best corners to have played the game, in any era. When you have speed like he did, you don't have to be physical. It's not like he played in the 70s, there were plenty of physical WRs in the league during his prime. |
|
03-18-2005, 03:30 PM | #33 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: 129 W 81st street
Age: 45
Posts: 3,503
|
Re: smoot's ranking
Quote:
|
|
03-18-2005, 03:36 PM | #34 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 60
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: smoot's ranking
With Smoot I think its one of those time will tell and its to early to tell. He did a great job this past year but he also was with one of the best Ds in the game. He will definetly be challenged this coming year and we will learn alot about him as a player. Hopefuly its not one of those god if we only had Smoot back.
|
03-18-2005, 03:40 PM | #35 |
Another Year, another mess.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,581
|
Re: smoot's ranking
he has always been good. I don't think Smoot is overrated because not often he was burned when he played at the position and he had the heart that made up for what he lacked in physical talent. Bailey is over-rated He got burned alot in big games as a skin and bronco
__________________
That got ugly fast |
03-18-2005, 03:59 PM | #36 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 293
|
Re: smoot's ranking
Good thing I like the Vikings too
|
03-18-2005, 05:07 PM | #37 | |
Contains football related knowledge
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 62
Posts: 10,401
|
Re: smoot's ranking
Quote:
Given the rules emphasis, the emphasis on man coverage, given his skills, and IMHO, Deion (in his prime) would thrive in today's game. |
|
03-18-2005, 06:18 PM | #38 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: 129 W 81st street
Age: 45
Posts: 3,503
|
Re: smoot's ranking
i would prefer to have a corner who can jam his man and disrupt his pattern than a guy that cant geta bump on the guy. the wr in this league are just as fast as they are in most cases.and furthermore how many times have you seen deion miss a takle because he was soft
|
03-19-2005, 12:04 AM | #39 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,569
|
Re: smoot's ranking
Quote:
|
|
03-19-2005, 08:37 AM | #40 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rockville
Age: 61
Posts: 795
|
Re: smoot's ranking
Based on the new rules of corner coverage, which recievers would do well? If I am correct a big strong reciever is not needed as much as speed. I think our team just addressed this very issue. So they must see it the same way we do, speed beats the corner becasue you can not bump a man outside the 5 yard line cushion and speed takes over.
Michael Irvin would not even be a hall of fame canidate then.
__________________
16-0 for 2007 |
|
|