|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-09-2015, 04:44 PM | #31 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Woodside, CA
Age: 56
Posts: 3,539
|
Re: The UGLY, the Bad and the gud
Has anyone covering the Redskins asked Gruden why he doesn't use DY more, and, if so, what has the response been? Seems a no brainer to do it, and yet it seems like Gruden has had a free pass on failing to use him. I know the FB position isn't sexy. But averaging more than 2.8 YPC sure is.
__________________
"Coach, what do you think of your team's execution?" "I'm all for it." -- Coach McKay |
Advertisements |
12-09-2015, 05:03 PM | #32 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,429
|
Re: The UGLY, the Bad and the gud
My understanding, but I don't remember where its from, is that Callahan doesn't use the fullback.
Sent from my S6 Edge |
12-09-2015, 06:29 PM | #33 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,281
|
Re: The UGLY, the Bad and the gud
Not sure if DY can solve the running game issues. Putting a fullback in front of the RB might help here and there, but we'll still have Lerib and Long getting blown up every other down.
Personally this running game has been a failure for the most part. Every week it's the same shit and we're averaging 2.0 a carry? SMH. I'd go with more of a pass first offense the rest of the way and stop beating your head against a wall. |
12-11-2015, 01:48 PM | #34 | |||
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: The UGLY, the Bad and the gud
Quote:
I looked it up just to check though. Last year the Cowboys used a FB on 14.2% of their snaps vs this year where Jay/McVay/Bill are at 8.7%. Imho even if Jay/McVay/Bill don't "like" to use a FB they should still cater to their personnel and be flexible in their schemes/gameplans. If they "like" to use 2+ TEs in some sets that's fine. But if we don't have the TEs capable to effectively block and provide a credible receiving threat then it shouldn't matter how much they like those sets. And we have a FB who is a great blocker, decent receiving threat and runner. They should be flexible/creative enough to adjust those plays/sets/formation and replace a TE with DY. Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
12-11-2015, 02:04 PM | #35 |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,420
|
Re: The UGLY, the Bad and the gud
Offense sucked balls. Djax is a complete moron. Marinelli handed Gruden/McVay/Callahan their asses in game planning and adjustments. Special teams sucked balls.
Defense at least came to play. Still didn't pressure Cassell enough though.
__________________
"So let me get this straight. We have the event of the year on TV with millions watching around the world... and people want a punt, pass, and kick competition to be the halftime entertainment?? Folks, don't quit your day jobs."- Matty |
12-11-2015, 04:29 PM | #36 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 368
|
Re: The UGLY, the Bad and the gud
People forget too that DY is an underrated "threat" as a FB. I used that in quotations because a FB is only going to be so much of a weapon in the passing game, but as far as FB's go, it seems like every pass he has every caught has done damage.
Why not send him in motion out of the backfield a few times a game, create some confusion for the opposing defense. There is no excuse for DY to be standing on the sideline twiddling his thumbs. |
12-11-2015, 06:08 PM | #37 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Woodside, CA
Age: 56
Posts: 3,539
|
Re: The UGLY, the Bad and the gud
DY had something like a 63 yard TD reception last year.
__________________
"Coach, what do you think of your team's execution?" "I'm all for it." -- Coach McKay |
12-11-2015, 06:30 PM | #38 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,720
|
Re: The UGLY, the Bad and the gud
Yea yea..but Kirk is the reason we lost…..according to some! by the way I agree with you!!
|
|
|