|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-14-2005, 05:29 PM | #31 |
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bristol, CT
Age: 61
Posts: 1,001
|
Re: Further Proof of an Anti Redskins Bias in the National Media
I'm not so fond of Peter King's take on the Redskins, and the whole Art Monk thing... but I know his brother Bob pretty well (married an ex-roommate), and Bob is a great guy. In fact I'm camping with the other Kings in a few weeks at Hammonasset beach.
|
Advertisements |
06-14-2005, 05:55 PM | #32 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 40
Posts: 3,109
|
Re: Further Proof of an Anti Redskins Bias in the National Media
Let's get off of Peter King for a second and look objectively at what we got from Morton. An average return man. He's slightly above average, but we signed him because he had one good game where he took back 2 kickoffs for TD's. Guess how many he got the rest of the year. 0. None. nada. Not so impressive is it?
I was never sold on him. King is a jackass. 2 games just by having Morton? Are you kidding me? |
06-14-2005, 08:57 PM | #33 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 2,029
|
Re: Further Proof of an Anti Redskins Bias in the National Media
Quote:
__________________
"It's absolutely criminal, in my opinion, that Monk has yet to be enshrined (in the Pro-Football Hall of Fame)" Dan Arkush PFW |
|
06-14-2005, 08:58 PM | #34 |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 2,029
|
Re: Further Proof of an Anti Redskins Bias in the National Media
Matty can we have a poll for BIGGEST IDIOT IN THE MEDIA:
Nominees: Pasta Belly King Stephen A. Smith
__________________
"It's absolutely criminal, in my opinion, that Monk has yet to be enshrined (in the Pro-Football Hall of Fame)" Dan Arkush PFW |
06-14-2005, 09:42 PM | #35 |
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 8,341
|
Re: Further Proof of an Anti Redskins Bias in the National Media
When you're a perenial loser you often think that the media has a bias against you.
__________________
Best. Player. Available. |
06-14-2005, 09:44 PM | #36 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 2,029
|
Re: Further Proof of an Anti Redskins Bias in the National Media
Quote:
__________________
"It's absolutely criminal, in my opinion, that Monk has yet to be enshrined (in the Pro-Football Hall of Fame)" Dan Arkush PFW |
|
06-14-2005, 10:07 PM | #37 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 106
|
Re: Further Proof of an Anti Redskins Bias in the National Media
Who exactly are you calling perrenial losers? The Redskins aren't any kind of losers, bub, and no fan would say otherwise. If you disagree, feel free to go ahead and change your tag line to read:
"Apparently not having unrelenting optimism and calling the Redskins losers means you're not a fan." Supporters cheer. Fanatics believe. --Phin the Fan |
06-14-2005, 10:14 PM | #38 | ||
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 44
Posts: 3,813
|
Re: Further Proof of an Anti Redskins Bias in the National Media
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
06-14-2005, 10:16 PM | #39 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 60
Posts: 3,097
|
Re: Further Proof of an Anti Redskins Bias in the National Media
Quote:
Daseal, did you take a close look at Brown the limited time he did play? The kid has some moves, he's not a stright line player, in all honesty the speed and excelleration that I saw from him was Daryl Green est, I couldn't believe my eye's the first time I saw him run, my thought was how on earth could a team just release a kid with that kind of speed? I expect very big thing's from Brown this season. Clinton Portis upon seeing Brown run turned to Gibbs and said "that's the fastest human I have ever seen". |
|
06-14-2005, 10:43 PM | #40 |
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 8,341
|
Re: Further Proof of an Anti Redskins Bias in the National Media
2004 - 6-10
2003 - 5-11 2002 - 7-9 2001 - 8-8 2000 - 8-8 1999 - 10-6 5 seasons without going over 500 in a row. How exactly does that not make us a perenial loser? Phinehas - the records speak for themselves, the Redskins, for the past 5 years, have been losers. Some teams have to be losers, and those 5 years we were the losers. Does that mean we have tos tay losers? No. How can you disagree with solid numbers. After loads of looking I estimate our all-time win %age to be just a bit over 500. Thanks mainly to Joe Gibbs. I can't find the exact number and my math, even for something so simple, isn't something I'd trust to base an argument on. It looked to be a bit over 500. If anyone can find the exact numbers I'd like to know. The Redskins HAVE been losing, Phinehas. Why can't we as fans accept this. We act as if the media and fans of other teams should declare our dominance every year like we say we're going to have. I'm looking just as forward to that day as you are, but unfortunately, it hasn't quite come yet. Maybe this year. Please, find anyone who's watched a game with me and haven't seen me cheer. Read all my posts and find me somewhere that I haven't believed Joe Gibbs will turn it around before he leaves DC. Your argument is based on false assumptions. In closing, maybe you should look at your team from another standpoint and not always the burgandy colored glasses. May help you get a more accurate picture of what tier the Redskins are currently grouped in todays NFL. EDIT:505-462-27 thats from 1932-2004 I dont think that includes a 22-15 postseason record so .5222222222 I didn't include ties because I wasn't sure how they were scored. Also, here's a Peter King article - look at that bias go! http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200...ng/01/09/mmqb/
__________________
Best. Player. Available. |
06-14-2005, 10:46 PM | #41 |
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 8,341
|
Re: Further Proof of an Anti Redskins Bias in the National Media
Offiss, from what I saw his speed was what opened him up more than jukes. He also was lucky to play when our special teams were starting to improve a bit. He actually got some blocks. I'm not taking anything away from Brown, I think he's better than Morton without a doubt, but I don't feel Morton was as bad as people want to say.
__________________
Best. Player. Available. |
06-14-2005, 11:05 PM | #42 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Further Proof of an Anti Redskins Bias in the National Media
Quote:
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
|
06-14-2005, 11:05 PM | #43 |
Inactive
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DC Metro Area
Age: 46
Posts: 5,829
|
Re: Further Proof of an Anti Redskins Bias in the National Media
Chad Morton was not a bad return man. The problem is that a return man is all he is and all he is ever going to be.
|
06-14-2005, 11:08 PM | #44 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Further Proof of an Anti Redskins Bias in the National Media
I have to go with Offiss on this one...I believe he had some nice moves along with some killer speed - impressed me far more than what Morton has done for us.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
06-14-2005, 11:08 PM | #45 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 2,029
|
Re: Further Proof of an Anti Redskins Bias in the National Media
Quote:
__________________
"It's absolutely criminal, in my opinion, that Monk has yet to be enshrined (in the Pro-Football Hall of Fame)" Dan Arkush PFW |
|
|
|