|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-10-2005, 05:52 PM | #31 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: Did anyone else watch Comcast postgame? (Lavar Related)
Quote:
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
|
Advertisements |
10-10-2005, 06:03 PM | #32 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. MD
Age: 46
Posts: 1,319
|
Re: Did anyone else watch Comcast postgame? (Lavar Related)
Quote:
|
|
10-10-2005, 06:48 PM | #33 |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 2,029
|
Re: Did anyone else watch Comcast postgame? (Lavar Related)
I'll trust Williams and his decisions and afterall, didn't Lavar cry that Gibbs and the Skins are rushing him along after his injury and showed no compassion.........
__________________
"It's absolutely criminal, in my opinion, that Monk has yet to be enshrined (in the Pro-Football Hall of Fame)" Dan Arkush PFW |
10-10-2005, 08:04 PM | #34 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Did anyone else watch Comcast postgame? (Lavar Related)
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
10-10-2005, 08:55 PM | #35 | |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 24
|
Re: Did anyone else watch Comcast postgame? (Lavar Related)
Quote:
Hey, we had other great defenses before Williams was here and they included LaVar. Last edited by hands11; 10-10-2005 at 10:03 PM. |
|
10-10-2005, 09:48 PM | #36 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
|
Re: Did anyone else watch Comcast postgame? (Lavar Related)
There are some who are convinced of the fact LaVar has never truly embraced JG and this coaching staff. How many remember the very first interview with LaVar after JG anounced he was returning to the team? He did not receive a ringing endorsement from LaVar. It was more or less "We have been loosing so much, and to the effect he was leary things would change." JG has had several serious heart to heart talks with LaVar and we as fans do not know the degree of those discussions. There has been so many things going on with him in the last eighteen months that I'm sure if we knew all the factors to be considered, maybe we would have a better understanding of why he is not playing. There are obviously many things to consider and the most important ones have not been printed. Joe Gibbs is the face of the Redskins now, and it could be that is not exactly to LaVar's liking.
|
10-10-2005, 10:08 PM | #37 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 24
|
Re: Did anyone else watch Comcast postgame? (Lavar Related)
Redskins pregame show. Williams was interviewed. He dodged the LaVar question. Then, right after, they started talking about the Denver offense.
The very first words out of his mouth were, the coaching is amazing. The change the offense to fix the talent they have. After I got my jaw off the ground, I game to post this. Ahhh, hello. How can you admire that so much in another coach but you don't do it yourself. Actually, changing the plays to fit the offense is something Gibbs was know for also. I think in some ways Williams doenst need as many stars for his system. Actually, do some extend, he is probably better without them. Maybe its one of those things we in 2 years, everyone can know the D well enough that you can get more agreesive from there. |
10-10-2005, 10:09 PM | #38 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: chesapeake,va.
Posts: 2,160
|
Re: Did anyone else watch Comcast postgame? (Lavar Related)
Quote:
preech on brother, i'm with ya.
__________________
Hail to Allen/Shanahan .... bring in some baby hogs and load up on diesel fuel !!! (budw38) |
|
10-10-2005, 10:42 PM | #39 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 50
|
Re: Did anyone else watch Comcast postgame? (Lavar Related)
Being the best athlete or most talented does not make you the best player. Gibbs is about hard work and discipline as is Greg Williams. You will never see a T.O. or Randy Moss on this team and they are the most talented and physically gifted at there position and how many rings do they have NONE. Now look at the Patriots they get hard working smart team players who do what they are assigned to do. No matter who goes down or gets hurt they can plug in anyone. Now I love Lavar when he hits people it makes me feel all warm inside. But we are a well disciplened defense and if he doesn't buy in to that and learn to play that way keep him on bench. I see people talk about us givin up those rushing yards to Denver well year in and year out Denver has one of the best rushing attacks in the league. Look at what happened to Coles one year our best offensive player then last year he did nothing I know he was hurt and we didnt throw deep but aot of Moss catches have been short but he runs after catch. A couple deep balls but most are short. Every move that has been made this year even though we questioned it has been proved right si far and I feel this will too.
|
10-10-2005, 11:43 PM | #40 | |
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: Did anyone else watch Comcast postgame? (Lavar Related)
Quote:
|
|
10-10-2005, 11:57 PM | #41 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: Did anyone else watch Comcast postgame? (Lavar Related)
I am not a big name caller but at the risk of sounding petty and bitchy anyone who thinks Lavar should be playing or that Lavar isn't playing for any other reason than performance issues is just plain retarded.
I'd love one of you morons to say to Williams' or Gibbs' face that Lavar isn't playing because of some contract dispute. I think Gibbs' might punch you and I imagine Williams' might have Sean Taylor kill you. How anyone can think that either of those guys would sacrifice the supposed playmaking ability that you all seem to think we cannot live without to the detriment of the team is mind boggling. And to think that somehow the coaches just don't seem to understand how Lavar JUST HAS TO PLAY because he is so great is only slightly less moronic. You see anyone on our defense that freelances? No. Why not? Because their ass is on the bench when they do. Williams' defense is predicated on 11 guys doing their job. If the 11 guys play together and everyone does their job then the defense is going to win the battle. If one guy blows an assignment for any reason then they are screwed. Why? Because the other 10 guys are doing their job and don't have the ability to drop what they're doing to pick up someone else's mistake. There is no "Package" where they can just put Lavar in to rush the QB constantly. They'll get burned as soon as every team watches the tape and sees that all he does is rush the QB. He has to be able to play IN THE SCHEME otherwise he brings nothing but risk with little reward. |
10-11-2005, 02:10 AM | #42 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
|
Re: Did anyone else watch Comcast postgame? (Lavar Related)
It's that #56 Jersy they purchased, it "DEMANDS" that he plays. I'm still wearing #28.
|
10-11-2005, 02:35 AM | #43 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 519
|
Re: Did anyone else watch Comcast postgame? (Lavar Related)
well, now that we've got him shipped out of D.C.:FIREdevil
__________________
SAY HELLO TO THE BAD GUY........ |
10-11-2005, 02:40 AM | #44 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 26
|
Re: Did anyone else watch Comcast postgame? (Lavar Related)
[QUOTE=Mattyk72]Ugh, this is seriously turning in to Ramsey/Brunell all over again.
There is no comparison right here like Ramsey/Brunell. Holdman is nowhere close to the caliber player as LaVar. When GW came in last year he made a point in saying he was moving LaVar back to Weak side LB so he could freelance and make big plays. Now all of a sudden he doesn't want that. What has Holdman done that has saved a game. I did see him out of position when Tatum broke that second run. LaVar would have broke those blocks and he would have been stopped and WE WIN! Nobody can tell me that Holdman or Clemons can be trusted more. Weakside LB is not like Middle or Strongside. If LaVar was in the middle, I could totally understand where GW is coming from. If nobody remembers, but Warrick was picked up this last offseason and LaVar has been learning this system as long as anyone else so I dont buy that they can't trust him. We need LA and thats it. Please dont compare it to Brunell/Ramsey.... |
10-11-2005, 05:36 AM | #45 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 60
Posts: 3,097
|
Re: Did anyone else watch Comcast postgame? (Lavar Related)
[QUOTE=RedskinNation21]
Quote:
I have seen Lavar over persue play's time and again and get burned, there's no way to know if he makes those plays on Bell. The funny part about this whole thing is Lavar doesn't seem to want to listen to Williams, apparently he continues to believe he knows more than GW and refuses to do what's asked of him, he's his own worst enemy. |
|
|
|