Today, Brunell looked like Ramsey

MTK · 11-14-2005, 12:11 PM

Why oh why do we have to keep revisiting the QB situation?

Redskins_P · 11-14-2005, 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Why oh why do we have to keep revisiting the QB situation?

I say the same thing to myself. As soon as we lose though........

railcon56 · 11-14-2005, 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redskins_P

I say the same thing to myself. As soon as we lose though........

Ty that was real and honest!!!!!!!

MTK · 11-14-2005, 12:38 PM

Brunell has had a quality season to this point, I just don't see the point in speculating about "WWRD" (What would Ramsey do?) after every loss.

railcon56 · 11-14-2005, 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Brunell has had a quality season to this point, I just don't see the point in speculating about "WWRD" (What would Ramsey do?) after every loss.

Hmmm he has played great but if they breath on him he fumbles...you cant win games turning the ball over..but i think hes played well i had the bus started but I put it back in the garage no brunell bandwagon... he just cant take hits anymore!!!!

hurrykaine · 11-14-2005, 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by railcon56@comcast.net

Hmmm he has played great but if they breath on him he fumbles...you cant win games turning the ball over..but i think hes played well i had the bus started but it back in the garage no brunell bandwagon... he just cant take hits anymore!!!!

You nailed it. Line Protection must improve. and Brunell has to stop fumbling it. I suggest crouching down in turtle position when a D-lineman breaks loose and comes towards him. LOL

Redskins_P · 11-14-2005, 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by railcon56@comcast.net

Hmmm he has played great but if they breath on him he fumbles...you cant win games turning the ball over..but i think hes played well i had the bus started but it back in the garage no brunell bandwagon... he just cant take hits anymore!!!!

Brunell does have to do a better job of protecting the ball, but you can't discount what he's done for this team so far this season. I'm still on his bandwagon!

jermus22 · 11-14-2005, 01:39 PM

The fact we put up 35 pts against the league's #1 D says a lot. I'm not sure why we're complaining about the offense. We might have had more if the refs had the decency to give us a good spot on Portis's 3 & 2 run. My concerns lie with the defense.

CrazyCanuck · 11-14-2005, 02:58 PM

Brunell was fine yesterday. The fumble was bad and maybe the 2nd INT was his fault but all in all he played a solid game again.

Blame the D, or blame our O line that insists on letting one opponent cause havoc in our backfield all game. At least this week I had heard of the guy before (Rice).

RedskinPete · 11-14-2005, 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 44deisel44

Please!!!! Dont do this thread.......brunell had a decent outing...If Patton woulda come back towards ball and catch(Moss)NO pick!!!!!...second, Brunell shoulda audibled(which he said he doesnt dare in THIS weeks conference) in an OBVIOUS man 4 man coverage with man in motion and DB following

!!!! QUICK SLANT not gonna work. Kudos for rice's hustle to make the pick....I'm finding it harder and harder to talk with the Negative fan base here!!!!Please guys...Keep your head up. Im impressed(once again) with our offensive game plan and performance!!!!! Ive told my family...of skins fans with over 2 centuries of devotion among us that we do NOT need to be so aggresive on defense!!! We have the talent on Offense greg!!!!!! We dont need u to win games THIS year. By the way...LOVE the new faces....

YOU ARE SO RIGHT!!!! Patton blew that pass up!!! He had way more then the Skins needed for a first down. He was lazzy or what ever!!!! He has been in this league or played football to long NOT to know this!!! AS for the D I like aggresive play but DB should never let WR's get behind them!!!

skinsguy · 11-14-2005, 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jermus22

The fact we put up 35 pts against the league's #1 D says a lot. I'm not sure why we're complaining about the offense. We might have had more if the refs had the decency to give us a good spot on Portis's 3 & 2 run. My concerns lie with the defense.

Well actually, 28 points against the #1 defense, which is still very good. 7 of our points came with Betts' kick off return.

11-14-2005, 12:11 PM	#31
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: NY Age: 52 Posts: 99,518	Re: Today, Brunell looked like Ramsey Why oh why do we have to keep revisiting the QB situation?

11-14-2005, 12:38 PM	#34
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: NY Age: 52 Posts: 99,518	Re: Today, Brunell looked like Ramsey Brunell has had a quality season to this point, I just don't see the point in speculating about "WWRD" (What would Ramsey do?) after every loss.

11-14-2005, 01:39 PM	#38
jermus22 Special Teams Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Frankfort, KY Age: 42 Posts: 336	Re: Today, Brunell looked like Ramsey The fact we put up 35 pts against the league's #1 D says a lot. I'm not sure why we're complaining about the offense. We might have had more if the refs had the decency to give us a good spot on Portis's 3 & 2 run. My concerns lie with the defense. __________________ Win it in the trenches.

11-14-2005, 02:58 PM	#39
CrazyCanuck Serenity Now Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Canada Posts: 2,008	Re: Today, Brunell looked like Ramsey Brunell was fine yesterday. The fumble was bad and maybe the 2nd INT was his fault but all in all he played a solid game again. Blame the D, or blame our O line that insists on letting one opponent cause havoc in our backfield all game. At least this week I had heard of the guy before (Rice).

Today, Brunell looked like Ramsey

Locker Room Main Forum