2015 Redskins Coaches/Coordinators News

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by over the mountain

i think the seahawks O line (talent wise) is below average. Unger is a premium player but was injured. i dont think he has played all year. Okung you dont hear much about him which its usually a good thing but i dont think he is pro bowl caliber or in TW's level.

will be interesting to see what seattle looks like 2 years from now after RW gets biggest NFL contract ever and thomas, sherman etc. contracts start accelerating.

Yeah, Im mean we probably have bottom third of the league Oline. Seattle has a fairly average Oline, a top ten RB (maybe top 5), and bottom 5 receiving corp....but Wilson is average (yeah right)

[over the mountain]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

Yeah, Im mean we probably have bottom third of the league Oline. Seattle has a fairly average Oline, a top ten RB (maybe top 5), and bottom 5 receiving corp....but Wilson is average (yeah right)

im starting to think lynch is top 3 w murray and bell.

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

Yeah, Im mean we probably have bottom third of the league Oline. Seattle has a fairly average Oline, a top ten RB (maybe top 5), and bottom 5 receiving corp....but Wilson is average (yeah right)

Maybe top 5 RB? Seriously? Doug Baldwin, Jermaine Kearse, Paul Richardson before he got hurt was not a slouch, and the most elite defense we have seen since the 2000 Ravens and 2002 Bucs.

Russell Wilson is an above average QB on an elite team, and don't downplay the Seahawks O-Line.

Russell Wilson is not an elite QB, he has basically single handedly given the last 2 NFC Championship games away. Luckily for him the 49ers and Packers gave it right back.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

Maybe top 5 RB? Seriously? Doug Baldwin, Jermaine Kearse, Paul Richardson before he got hurt was not a slouch, and the most elite defense we have seen since the 2000 Ravens and 2002 Bucs.

Russell Wilson is an above average QB on an elite team, and don't downplay the Seahawks O-Line.

Russell Wilson is not an elite QB, he has basically single handedly given the last 2 NFC Championship games away. Luckily for him the 49ers and Packers gave it right back.

Lynch no 4 in rushing yards this year, and no 1 rushing tds. Leading the post season in rushing year this and last year.
Easy arguement for top 5.
Yes their top 3 receivers in the bottom 3rd of league and they don't have a TE either.

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

Lynch no 4 in rushing yards this year, and no 1 rushing tds. Leading the post season in rushing year this and last year.
Easy arguement for top 5.
Yes their top 3 receivers in the bottom 3rd of league and they don't have a TE either.

Lynch is a top 2 RB and I guess Luke Wilson and company are just complete trash.

This is why I don't like the Seahawks, people down play how elite and talented that team is and give ALL the credit to Russell Wilson.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by over the mountain

i think the seahawks O line (talent wise) is below average. Unger is a premium player but was injured. i dont think he has played all year. Okung you dont hear much about him which its usually a good thing but i dont think he is pro bowl caliber or in TW's level.

will be interesting to see what seattle looks like 2 years from now after RW gets biggest NFL contract ever and thomas, sherman etc. contracts start accelerating.

I'll take Seattle's o-line anytime over our o-line.

Originally Posted by Chico23231

Yeah, Im mean we probably have bottom third of the league Oline. Seattle has a fairly average Oline, a top ten RB (maybe top 5), and bottom 5 receiving corp....but Wilson is average (yeah right)

Wilson is a top 15/top 10 QB statistically speaking. Seattle has surrounded him with good talent and he has taken advantage of that talent to become one of the better QBs in the league.

Seattle is probably one of the most complete teams in the NFL right now. Hence being able to win a playoff game when they turned the ball over 5 times.

[over the mountain]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

I'll take Seattle's o-line anytime over our o-line.

i do covet an elite center - unger, mack pouncey. i think center is so important but still somewhat undervalued in contract terms. most bang for your buck. (that saying had to start in a texas whore house)

but out of both O lines, Trent williams is the only bonafide building block stud. the rest of the guys on both teams are replaceable. for trent alone, i take the skins - keep trent and lich - cut the rest.

maybe the seahawks guards are good and im totally overlooking them. i honestly dont know. our guards do suck. we probably have the worst guard roster of any team. .. . .

[SFREDSKIN]

Originally Posted by over the mountain

i think the seahawks O line (talent wise) is below average. Unger is a premium player but was injured. i dont think he has played all year. Okung you dont hear much about him which its usually a good thing but i dont think he is pro bowl caliber or in TW's level.

will be interesting to see what seattle looks like 2 years from now after RW gets biggest NFL contract ever and thomas, sherman etc. contracts start accelerating.

NFL How they were built: Comparing Redskins' roster to Super Bowl teams - ESPN

[over the mountain]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

NFL How they were built: Comparing Redskins' roster to Super Bowl teams - ESPN

dang, thanks for the link. right on point.

i didnt know the seahawks invested high draft picks on the interior line. smart move. seems like you can find stud guards and centers in the late 1st to 3rd round. hope ours come into shape.

[HailGreen28]

Originally Posted by over the mountain

dang, thanks for the link. right on point.

i didnt know the seahawks invested high draft picks on the interior line. smart move. seems like you can find stud guards and centers in the late 1st to 3rd round. hope ours come into shape.

The biggest difference between us and the SB teams in that article, is that they drafted most of their starting OL. We have to bring in FAs, mostly.

[DYoungJelly]

Originally Posted by HailGreen28

The biggest difference between us and the SB teams in that article, is that they drafted most of their starting OL. We have to bring in FAs, mostly.

The Patriots are starting undrafted free agents on their line.

How can the Redskins build a Super Bowl quality O-line? | Rich Tandler's Real Redskins

[MTK]

Originally Posted by over the mountain

i think the seahawks O line (talent wise) is below average. Unger is a premium player but was injured. i dont think he has played all year. Okung you dont hear much about him which its usually a good thing but i dont think he is pro bowl caliber or in TW's level.

will be interesting to see what seattle looks like 2 years from now after RW gets biggest NFL contract ever and thomas, sherman etc. contracts start accelerating.

He went to the Pro Bowl in 2012 and is widely considered a top LT.

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

He went to the Pro Bowl in 2012 and is widely considered a top LT.

You better stop Matty, it is clearly all Russell Wilson, he is Joe Montana mixed with Tom Brady with a hint of Drew Brees.

[KI Skins Fan]

Let's boil down our talent problem to it's essence: We have had incompetent upper management and a star-struck, over-involved owner for most of the last twenty years.

[Meks]

Watching 2012 highlight packages is depressing... But its the type of passion these coaches need to coax out of the players this year... Hopefully its a quick learning curve for our guys.