Media Bias

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

If u think that’s a good chart for CNN...wow

I think the high level of reporting facts based on unnamed sources is a shift in journalism standards over the last ten years is a move in the wrong direction

Yet it's a better position then your FOX news or your "INFOWARS"

[Giantone]

Trump looks like a real ass doing this .............


https://www.yahoo.com/news/fox-news-...215118157.html

[Giantone]

Trump seems to be an ass no matter where he is in the world............


https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-uk-...102718758.html

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by Giantone

Yet it's a better position then your FOX news or your "INFOWARS"

Yeah these are mine. G2, you must not read my post.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

Yeah these are mine. G2, you must not read my post.

That just it I do, and you deny ,then you quote or agree with them.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by Giantone

That just it I do, and you deny ,then you quote or agree with them.

Naw. I watch or quote neither. I may linked a article from fox.com here and there but not a lot.

I read cnn.com, New York Times, Chicago tribune, and mostly richmond Times dispatch. I generally don’t watch national tv news...to biased and opinion based and not fact based. I’ll watch the local news cause we got good programming here.

I’ve tried hard to read Washington post...but unfortunately they are complete garbage and the should be printed on snow flakes. There take on identity politics generally make me laugh...their quality of journalism has taken a nosedive the last several years. They got a lotta problems internally and it shows.

If I want to get the facts on the economy, Wall Street journal is where bosses go to get it. If I want fake news on the economy I’ll go to cnn money section and laugh repeatedly.

[MTK]

Personal bias trumps all, no pun intended

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by MTK

Personal bias trumps all, no pun intended

I agree ,evidently Cred does not as per post #519

[MTK]

Which WH was more combative and outwardly negative towards the media? Trump came out swinging from day 1.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by MTK

Which WH was more combative and outwardly negative towards the media? Trump came out swinging from day 1.

I agree on that, with one addendum. It didn't start with this administration. There had been a deteriorating condition in this country over the past 12 years as the politicians on both sides became more partisan, and the concept of moderation over the internet became less the norm and hyper partisanship has taken over.

[Chico23231]

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...-idUSKBN1KC0DC

Reuters broke a story that this Russian spy met with 2 high obama officials in 2015...

Can someone tell me why the NYT, Washington post, la times, nbc news who have run multiple stories attempting to connect her to trump...somehow overlooked the this timeline and this major story?

This is why they are fake news...because whose to say they knew and never reported this? If these are the supposed top news journalists in the world...we would expect Reuters to report this over the others?

And now they are not mentioning this story? Doesn’t it seem strange? They cherry pick the facts to make up the narrative they want folks.

[mooby]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...-idUSKBN1KC0DC

Reuters broke a story that this Russian spy met with 2 high obama officials in 2015...

Can someone tell me why the NYT, Washington post, la times, nbc news who have run multiple stories attempting to connect her to trump...somehow overlooked the this timeline and this major story?

This is why they are fake news...because whose to say they knew and never reported this? If these are the supposed top news journalists in the world...we would expect Reuters to report this over the others?

And now they are not mentioning this story? Doesn’t it seem strange? They cherry pick the facts to make up the narrative they want folks.

Well let's see. The Reuters article was posted yesterday.

A quick Google search brings up:

Wall St. Journal has picked it up

CNN has picked it up

CBS News has picked it up

New York Times ran it as an exclusive two days ago

CNBC ran it yesterday

And MSN (my main source) seems to be broken right now so I'll give them a pass, but I expect to see something on there about it when it comes back up.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by mooby

Well let's see. The Reuters article was posted yesterday.

A quick Google search brings up:

Wall St. Journal has picked it up

CNN has picked it up

CBS News has picked it up

New York Times ran it as an exclusive two days ago

CNBC ran it yesterday

And MSN (my main source) seems to be broken right now so I'll give them a pass, but I expect to see something on there about it when it comes back up.

don't use a google search, go to each site's main page, then navigate to that story. Tell me how easy it is to find WITHOUT the search, in other words what the normal site goer might see.

CNN had it on their main page
WSJ had it on their politics page
msnbc didn't have it in their scroll of headlines
CBS was scrolling through the politics page

The NYT which ran it as an exclusive did it on it's Europe page

EUROPE

Exclusive: Alleged Russian Agent Butina Met With U.S. Treasury, Fed Officials

Look at the headline, and tell me if you realize that is meetings with Obama administration officials?



___
Media bias is in how stories are presented, and the weight they are given. Clearly every ap/reuters stories gets loaded into every news site's listings, but how/where it is run and how much screen time it gets plays a huge part in what I would describe as media bias.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

don't use a google search, go to each site's main page, then navigate to that story. Tell me how easy it is to find WITHOUT the search, in other words what the normal site goer might see.

CNN had it on their main page
WSJ had it on their politics page
msnbc didn't have it in their scroll of headlines
CBS was scrolling through the politics page

The NYT which ran it as an exclusive did it on it's Europe page


Look at the headline, and tell me if you realize that is meetings with Obama administration officials?

___
Media bias is in how stories are presented, and the weight they are given. Clearly every ap/reuters stories gets loaded into every news site's listings, but how/where it is run and how much screen time it gets plays a huge part in what I would describe as media bias.

LOL, so use the internet but only the way I tell you to use it. Don't look now but guess who is trying to control the narrative.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by mooby

Well let's see. The Reuters article was posted yesterday.

A quick Google search brings up:

Wall St. Journal has picked it up

CNN has picked it up

CBS News has picked it up

New York Times ran it as an exclusive two days ago

CNBC ran it yesterday

And MSN (my main source) seems to be broken right now so I'll give them a pass, but I expect to see something on there about it when it comes back up.

When I searched her name and news...cbs showed it. Cnn had it on there politics side (somehow not a front page story). NYT, didn’t pull the article when I searched.

But, still...weird rueters finds the story and none until they did.

Hey mooby, any guess why CNN not running the shooters name from Toronto on the front page? I see they updated their story at 6 pm and promptly removed (buried it) in their world page. Not a peep of the most circulating story from the last 24 hours.

Muslim I guess? Doesn’t fit the narrative they wanted of crazy white guy mass shooter? Possible terrorist just shouldn’t be news...