Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Locker Room Main Forum


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-15-2012, 12:56 PM   #496
diehard
The Starter
 
diehard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Norfolk, Va (OV)
Posts: 1,566
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Manning Bowl...
__________________
'Any NFL team will win with RG3. Imagine how exciting it will be watching him do it.'
diehard is offline  

Advertisements
Old 01-15-2012, 01:32 PM   #497
artmonkforhallofamein07
Pro Bowl
 
artmonkforhallofamein07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 5,001
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Manning v Manning twice a year would be a prime matchup for the league.
Honestly looking at this move from a league stand point and in particular from a Fox stand point this would be huge for any network airing the game as far as ratings and pre game hype machine. Throw in that the Redskins and Giants could both be in the hunt for the division and playoff spots at the end of the year, the TV networks would salivating for this matchup twice a year.

Throw in the fact that DC is a huge market and the fact that a guy like PM could come in here and turn this deal around fast making the Redskins a NFC East, playoff contender, and SB contender for a 2 or 3 years it would be a huge, both beneficial to the Redskins and Peyton.

So for if Archie doesn't want it to happen he is just trying to save Eli from being embarrassed by his older brother twice a year.

Can a father really try and control the older Manning's career? He may have been able to get away with it when Eli was a rookie, but you are talking about a grown ass man here who has accomplished more than his father ever did and could become a hero in the Nations Capital.

There can be more reasons made for Peyton to come to DC then there are for him not too.
__________________
Just win.
artmonkforhallofamein07 is offline  
Old 01-15-2012, 10:57 PM   #498
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

I say go get RGIII. Don't give away the farm but be willing to part with a piece or two of heavy equipment. Right now I'm willing to give St. Louis two first and our second as well as an additional pick next year.

RGIII is a legitimate first overall talent, just so happens that he's in the same draft with a once in a generation prospect. He is the real deal, unmatched athletic ability, rocket arm, pinpoint accuracy, and a mind thats more impressive then all of that.

And as a lot of you are aware of things don't start happening until you start to get real production out of the QB position.

Anway heres how I see it, we can trade back and pick a bunch of nice pieces, draft a project like Tannehill, and risk our coach being fired provided he eeks out a .500 season. Or we could draft RGIII, give him an offensive mastermind like the Shanahans and still have a QB prospect that can excel under any coach in the league should the Shanahan experiment prove to be a failure in the near future. In other words there would be hope should we have to start over.

To me thats much better then seeing Shanahan get fired next year or the year after and being stuck with Tannehill.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG

Last edited by Dirtbag59; 01-15-2012 at 10:58 PM.
Dirtbag59 is offline  
Old 01-15-2012, 11:24 PM   #499
skinsfaninok
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 38
Posts: 36,158
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtbag59 View Post
I say go get RGIII. Don't give away the farm but be willing to part with a piece or two of heavy equipment. Right now I'm willing to give St. Louis two first and our second as well as an additional pick next year.

RGIII is a legitimate first overall talent, just so happens that he's in the same draft with a once in a generation prospect. He is the real deal, unmatched athletic ability, rocket arm, pinpoint accuracy, and a mind thats more impressive then all of that.

And as a lot of you are aware of things don't start happening until you start to get real production out of the QB position.

Anway heres how I see it, we can trade back and pick a bunch of nice pieces, draft a project like Tannehill, and risk our coach being fired provided he eeks out a .500 season. Or we could draft RGIII, give him an offensive mastermind like the Shanahans and still have a QB prospect that can excel under any coach in the league should the Shanahan experiment prove to be a failure in the near future. In other words there would be hope should we have to start over.

To me thats much better then seeing Shanahan get fired next year or the year after and being stuck with Tannehill.
I agree I think RG3 can start for us day one like Dalton and cam did this year and have an immediate impact. Heard GB wasn't going to franchise flynn but apparently Seattle and Cleveland are heavy suitors for him. Either way No QB equals another losing season and mike wont last another 5 win year, and he shouldn't if that's the case.

#Hail to the Redskins
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.”
― Nick Saban
skinsfaninok is offline  
Old 01-15-2012, 11:29 PM   #500
Shadowbyte
Special Teams
 
Shadowbyte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 413
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Sign Matt Flynn and draft Kellan Moore in the 2nd Pick up an OL with the 6th pick, and sign 2 of the 3 receivers V. Jackson/Desean/Bowe and we're suprebowl bound. If the Giants can make it this far then so can we! We're just a QB and a stud WR away.

Last edited by Shadowbyte; 01-15-2012 at 11:32 PM.
Shadowbyte is offline  
Old 01-15-2012, 11:30 PM   #501
diehardskin2982
Another Year, another mess.
 
diehardskin2982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,581
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtbag59 View Post
I say go get RGIII. Don't give away the farm but be willing to part with a piece or two of heavy equipment.
I agree with you but I would keep enough to draft LaMichael James so I'm not giving up the 2nd rounder. Those two on the skins would make the skins offense atleast two times better than they are now
__________________
That got ugly fast
diehardskin2982 is offline  
Old 01-15-2012, 11:39 PM   #502
Big C
Mr. Brightside
 
Big C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 4,453
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by diehardskin2982 View Post
I agree with you but I would keep enough to draft LaMichael James so I'm not giving up the 2nd rounder. Those two on the skins would make the skins offense atleast two times better than they are now
i dont see the sense in using a 2nd rounder on lamichael james when we have helu and royster who looked very good last season. we have other areas of need that could be addressed with that pick such as the secondary, a wide receiver, or an offensive lineman.
__________________
"I don't care what nobody say I'm a be me, stay hood stay real, cause I'm out here grindin'" -Joe Gibbs
Big C is offline  
Old 01-15-2012, 11:47 PM   #503
NC_Skins
Gamebreaker
 
NC_Skins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,515
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

If we draft a RB in this upcoming draft, I will drive to Redskins park and slap the shit of of Mike Shanahan myself. You think his skin is red now, wait till my five fingers meets his face.
__________________
"So let me get this straight. We have the event of the year on TV with millions watching around the world... and people want a punt, pass, and kick competition to be the halftime entertainment?? Folks, don't quit your day jobs."- Matty
NC_Skins is offline  
Old 01-16-2012, 12:02 AM   #504
mooby
Hug Anne Spyder
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,479
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

I love how we're talking about using high draft picks on running backs when we have Mike Shanahan and two completely capable young backs here. Smart. I would do that if running back was the only hole on the team. But it's not. In fact, on offense alone, I would rank quarterback, wide receiver, starting right tackle, and backup offensive linemen a bigger need than running back. And if I threw in defense as well, I'd make starting cornerback and free safety a bigger need too. In short, if we had 7 picks in this upcoming draft, I'd use 6 of them on other needs before I even thought about drafting a running back.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team
mooby is offline  
Old 01-16-2012, 12:16 AM   #505
Shadowbyte
Special Teams
 
Shadowbyte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 413
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by NC_Skins View Post
If we draft a RB in this upcoming draft, I will drive to Redskins park and slap the shit of of Mike Shanahan myself. You think his skin is red now, wait till my five fingers meets his face.
Ha Ha, you won't even have to drive I'll pick u up myself all expenses paid.
Shadowbyte is offline  
Old 01-16-2012, 12:18 AM   #506
WaldSkins
Playmaker
 
WaldSkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 41
Posts: 2,726
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Just read this on Baltimoresun.com

stevegould Wow. Really? RT @BramWeinstein: One of the people who's opinion at ESPN I trust the most says Peyton + Saturday to Redskins is VERY likely.
__________________
"I would change that around, Jesus isn't Cutler. I guarantee you Jesus couldnt thread the ball like Jay does."-Monksdown
WaldSkins is offline  
Old 01-16-2012, 12:21 AM   #507
diehardskin2982
Another Year, another mess.
 
diehardskin2982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,581
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big C View Post
i dont see the sense in using a 2nd rounder on lamichael james when we have helu and royster who looked very good last season. we have other areas of need that could be addressed with that pick such as the secondary, a wide receiver, or an offensive lineman.
Why let me educate you sir. Trust me I felt the same way as you in the past but not anymore. I have read on Hogshaven that
Kyle Shanahan has already stated that if Hightower re-signs then the Redskins will actively seek out a fourth running back to the group.

We have a power runner in Hightower
A do it all in Helu
A change of Pace in Royster
In LaMichael James we will be the gamechanger

He is not to be used as a traditional runningback. You can line him up and use him at multiple positions like a Percy Harvin, Darren Sproles, or Reggie Bush. James can be put in the slot. He would often be on the field at the same time as our other runningbacks. Defenses have to account for a player of his skillset and caliber. Making it easier for other player to get one- on- one matchups and open.

Special teams- Goodbye Banks, Hello James. This guy has breakout speed and is dangerous in open space.

I think we have the rookie wideouts needed our roster now, they just need to be coached up and seasoned. You could maybe add Eddie Royal to replace Moss and a big target like Bowe, Colston, or Jackson. However Hankerson can be that big target. Let's not mention our tighends in this equation. I think if your looking at James as a tradional back then you might be a tad shortsided in your thinking. If you see him a utility player than you can see the potiental
__________________
That got ugly fast

Last edited by diehardskin2982; 01-16-2012 at 12:26 AM.
diehardskin2982 is offline  
Old 01-16-2012, 12:22 AM   #508
NC_Skins
Gamebreaker
 
NC_Skins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,515
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldSkins View Post
Just read this on Baltimoresun.com

stevegould Wow. Really? RT @BramWeinstein: One of the people who's opinion at ESPN I trust the most says Peyton + Saturday to Redskins is VERY likely.
Misunderstood tweet causes firestorm over Peyton Manning's future - WTOP.com
__________________
"So let me get this straight. We have the event of the year on TV with millions watching around the world... and people want a punt, pass, and kick competition to be the halftime entertainment?? Folks, don't quit your day jobs."- Matty
NC_Skins is offline  
Old 01-16-2012, 01:22 AM   #509
REDSKINS4ever
Playmaker
 
REDSKINS4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 4,105
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

I have the feeling that the RG3 will be a Redskin. We already know that the Colts will draft Luck and the Rams and Vikings have Bradford and Ponder so both Minnesota and St. Louis will be drafting at other positions. RG3 could easily fall to #6 where the Redskins pick if Cleveland takes Trent Richardson of Alabama and The Bucs take Claiborne from LSU.
REDSKINS4ever is offline  
Old 01-16-2012, 02:13 AM   #510
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big C View Post
i dont see the sense in using a 2nd rounder on lamichael james when we have helu and royster who looked very good last season. we have other areas of need that could be addressed with that pick such as the secondary, a wide receiver, or an offensive lineman.
I definitely see them drafting a running back this year. I mean at the very least Ryan Torains unexplained drop has to be fresh in their minds and when they're not yelling at Helu and Royster to get better in the weight room they'll be scouting RB's With that said I doubt they would take LaMicahel James in the 2nd.

On top of that why would we want to short change ourselves on a decade worth of pro-bowl level QB play because we were determined to get a 2nd round RB?

Be willing to pay the price. I mean don't give them 3 first round picks, but be willing to part with next years first round corner, Guard, or whatever that first round pick would turn out to be.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.40853 seconds with 10 queries