70Chip Presents the #56Fanatic "Does LaVar Deserve Special Treament" Poll

[MTK]

Originally Posted by jdlea

I wanna know how many times a Redskin should have to restructure his contract? wtf? Why do they even give them out if they have no intention of living up to them...ever?!

That's the name of the game in today's NFL.

Show me one team that actually pays out the full terms of a contract with no restructures.

[jdlea]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

That's the name of the game in today's NFL.

Show me one team that actually pays out the full terms of a contract with no restructures.

I already said that in my first post on this topic.

Originally Posted by steveo395

they still pay them all the money in a restructure but they just get it at a later time

They usually get cut before they see that money.

[steveo395]

Originally Posted by jdlea

I wanna know how many times a Redskin should have to restructure his contract? wtf? Why do they even give them out if they have no intention of living up to them...ever?!

they still pay them all the money in a restructure but they just get it at a later time

[#56fanatic]

Originally Posted by steveo395

they still pay them all the money in a restructure but they just get it at a later time

The only part they end up getting is the signing bonus, unless they stay for the entire lenght of the contract. Which with any player who is half way decent they never get the back end of the deal, that why they restructure it because by the time they get to back end, it cost to much to keep them. so its either restructure, or SEE YA, DONT LET THE DOOR HIT YA WHERE THE GOOD LORD SPLIT YA

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by steveo395

they still pay them all the money in a restructure but they just get it at a later time

no, the player gets it immediately, the team is just allowed to pro rate it over the rest of the length of the contract for cap purposes.

[TheMalcolmConnection]

My answer was actually yes he should, because there's no I in team.

Just wanted to see what people would say...

[70Chip]

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

... because there's no I in team...

Under the new collective bargaining agreement, that will change. GO TEIM!

[TheMalcolmConnection]

I do agree though. He's bothered me enough this year with his emotional crap that I'd be OK with him leaving. The only reason I'd want him to stay is talent ONLY, not for cap reasons or anything else.

However, if he took a pay cut to stay a Redskin, he'd have my full support and again be one of my favorite Redskins.

[TheMalcolmConnection]

Now we KNOW...

and we all know what knowing is... (I know TAFKAS is going to finish this for me)

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

Now we KNOW...

and we all know what knowing is... (I know TAFKAS is going to finish this for me)

...50% of the battle

Go Joe!

[TheMalcolmConnection]

You daaaaaaaaaamn right!

[taylor21dakila]

LaVar has been loyal 2 us his whole career that doesnt mean he deserves special treatment but he dont need people fakin on him jus cause we had a winin season without him

[BigSKINBauer]

Originally Posted by taylor21dakila

LaVar has been loyal 2 us his whole career that doesnt mean he deserves special treatment but he dont need people fakin on him jus cause we had a winin season without him

:cheeky-sm :smashfrea :headbange :headbange :headbange :smashfrea :headbange :headbange :headbange :cheeky-sm :thumb: :headbange :headbange :headbange

[Skins_4_Lyfe]

Originally Posted by taylor21dakila

LaVar has been loyal 2 us his whole career that doesnt mean he deserves special treatment but he dont need people fakin on him jus cause we had a winin season without him

My point exactly...

[irish]

LA has been a good (not great) LB but has not lived up to expectations. Like everyone, I thought he was going to be the LT of his era, it did not happen this way. I have to vote no.