![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: Brunell is Bad
Quote:
at LT: jones, ogden, pace, roaf, McKinnie and you could argue light, thomas, glenn and possibly clifton or the guy from the titans... so top 10-12 somewhere, but not top 5. RT: there's a legit arguement for jansen here, everybody is pretty close. gallery will be better in a year or two and runyan is better, but gross, mckenzie and anderson are all around the same level. at RG: shields, posibly rivera and then there's no one else... both those guys are 33 too, so thomas is top 3 without much question. c: Kruetz, mawae, birk, nalen, weigmann, bentley, saturday, flanagan, newberry, possibly meester... he'd be in the average class there... otherwise why would the ravens let him go after he started 15 games in one season for them? they had a guy (that was on IR i believe) who they liked more. and at LG we're probably mid 20s, there's ample room to upgrade there (spencer will be available, 350+ lbs (heaviest at combine) and ran a 5.28... dockery was 347 and ran a 5.58, so bigger and much more athletic with great drill work). |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Upper Marlboro, MD/Greensboro, NC
Age: 38
Posts: 482
|
Re: Brunell is Bad
Quote:
He made me a believer...I will always be bias when it comes to discussing Brunell after witnessing the game in Dallas (One of the best comebacks that I have seen to this day). He's getting up there and I to am anxious to see Campbell, but I think it was a good move to replace Ramsey last year or we would have added another year to our playoff drought. For the first time since I can recall, I didn't have to grind my teeth every time the QB dropped back to pass...my palms weren't as sweaty (and I've been a fan since Gus Frerotte). I felt comfortable with Brunell as our starter but Ramsey scares the hell out of me and I don't have alot of patience for a rookie project (Jason Campbell)...I wouldn't mind if Brunell were handed the keys again next year. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 55
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: Brunell is Bad
Brunell bashers, one question... What were you looking for from the QB position that we didn't get in '05?
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: Brunell is Bad
4,000+ yards passing, 45 TD, 0 Int. 80% completetion percentage, 158.3 Rating and 1,000 rushing yards.
Sorry I have high standards.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Upper Marlboro, MD/Greensboro, NC
Age: 38
Posts: 482
|
Re: Brunell is Bad
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: Brunell is Bad
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,596
|
Re: Brunell is Bad
guys, why put the blame on brunell? it's obviously nascar boy's fault that our team sucks and is going to fail next year right? he's obviously gotten too old to handle the nfl. we should put him out to pasture.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 8,341
|
Re: Brunell is Bad
Quote:
__________________
Best. Player. Available. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: Brunell is Bad
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: Brunell is Bad
We did win 10 games and a playoff game too, right?
Just checking. |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: Brunell is Bad
I'm still baffled by the title of this thread. We were a couple of wins away from the big dance, and somehow people find things wrong with Portis, or Brunell, or this or that guy. I know it's an open forum and I'm totally cool with that, but to bash guys who had Pro-Bowl caliber seasons is just beyond me.
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
|
Re: Brunell is Bad
So after all this is said and done, you've flip-flopped a bit, do you still think that Brunell is bad or do you think that he's not as great as he was made out to be last year?
I strongly feel that he made plays when he had to and definitely had a Pro Bowl caliber season, however I feel he should have had the balls to sit down when his knee wasn't 100% in the playoffs.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 68
|
Re: Brunell is Bad
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Brunell is Bad
Quote:
But the same could also be said about Joe Montana, Steve Young, Joe Theismann, John Elway, Terry Bradshaw, etc.....
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 68
|
Re: Brunell is Bad
Quote:
please don't tell me you are comparing brunell to any of those guys. They won. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|