Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


LA Responds to Critizism

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-06-2006, 01:10 PM   #46
RiggoRules
Special Teams
 
RiggoRules's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 380
Re: LA Responds to Critizism

One of the interesting aspects of the story is the issue of the Redskins playbook that Lavar now refers to as "Arrington property now. New York Giants property now."

Not certain, but I thought that walking with a playbook when you left a team was a big legal issue.
__________________
"Lighten up, Sandy Baby."
RiggoRules is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 10-06-2006, 01:26 PM   #47
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: LA Responds to Critizism

I think someone else alluded to it. But I believe what really upset LaVar is that the team didn't bend over backwards for him, establish a different set of rules just for him. Almost all pro athletes spend their entire lives getting everything their way because they are the best each step of the way. But when they get to the pro level, they have to realize the majority of them are no longer unique. That they're just one of a whole team worth of "best players" and suddenly they have to go by the rules of the team, not their own. Some have trouble accepting this, I think LA is one of those guys.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2006, 01:50 PM   #48
DaveyFoSho
Special Teams
 
DaveyFoSho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Potomac, MD
Age: 38
Posts: 304
Re: LA Responds to Critizism

What i dont understand is.....In college kickers had to practice kicking over ladders in order to account for LaVar...why couldnt he block more kicks????? He is a great athlete and i was a little sad to see him go. Bottom line is he just cannot cut it in complex systems where everyone has a lane and a job to do. 1st play of the game will be a misdirection and LaVar will be all the way over in no man's land!
__________________
DaveyFoSho
DaveyFoSho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2006, 01:54 PM   #49
RedskinRat
Franchise Player
 
RedskinRat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: I'm in LA, trick!
Posts: 8,700
Re: LA Responds to Critizism

Anyone listening to The Larry Miachaels Show?

It's getting a little too 'LaVar' for my liking.

LaVar will be out of his mind on Sunday and we'll take advantage of it early and often.
RedskinRat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2006, 02:00 PM   #50
Manusky91
Special Teams
 
Manusky91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: New Jersey
Age: 49
Posts: 200
Re: LA Responds to Critizism

Quote:
Originally Posted by RiggoRules View Post
One of the interesting aspects of the story is the issue of the Redskins playbook that Lavar now refers to as "Arrington property now. New York Giants property now."

Not certain, but I thought that walking with a playbook when you left a team was a big legal issue.
I agree, the playbook comment worries me more than anything he's going to do on the field. That could be a real problem if they truly have our defensive playbook.
Manusky91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2006, 02:02 PM   #51
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,569
Re: LA Responds to Critizism

It really doesn't matter if he has a playbook or not.

Any team can look at film and see what other teams do.

It's the game plan that matters.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2006, 02:04 PM   #52
redsk1
The Starter
 
redsk1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
Re: LA Responds to Critizism

It's no secret LA and Dale Lindsey didn't get along. I don't think Lindsey planned to make those comments, I think they just came out. That's the story here. Remember the conspiracy theories floating around why LA wasn't playing. The moment of truth came out and that truth was that LA didn't know the system-couldn't play in the system-didn't spend the time to learn the system.

What really took me by suprise was a player whom is respected, Springs, said the same thing.

I'm sure these comments kind of stung. I defended LA while he was here and really didn't want to believe someone w/ his potential and athletic ability couldn't fit in this defense. It's kind of sad actually. Wish it would have turned out differently, but the nfl is a business in the end.
redsk1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2006, 02:04 PM   #53
RiggoRules
Special Teams
 
RiggoRules's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 380
Re: LA Responds to Critizism

Quote:
Originally Posted by Manusky91 View Post
I agree, the playbook comment worries me more than anything he's going to do on the field. That could be a real problem if they truly have our defensive playbook.
I don't think it is that big of an issue on game day. It is a huge document. It is like getting Chef Gordon Ramsey's cook book. Having it doesn't tell you what he is going to do in his resturaunt that day or how you can prepare something exactly like he does.

I think it is more of a principal thing.
__________________
"Lighten up, Sandy Baby."
RiggoRules is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2006, 02:57 PM   #54
ArtMonkDrillz
Franchise Player
 
ArtMonkDrillz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 8,029
Re: LA Responds to Critizism

Quote:
Originally Posted by RiggoRules View Post
I don't think it is that big of an issue on game day. It is a huge document. It is like getting Chef Gordon Ramsey's cook book. Having it doesn't tell you what he is going to do in his resturaunt that day or how you can prepare something exactly like he does.

I think it is more of a principal thing.
Sounds like someone has been getting caught up on old episodes of Hell's Kitchen on their TiVo.

Like Matty said, the game plan is more important. Plus, we all know that we haven't been blitzing the same with Springs out, so it's probably a bit different this year than it was when LA was here.
__________________
"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man." The Dude
ArtMonkDrillz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2006, 03:20 PM   #55
Longtimefan
Playmaker
 
Longtimefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
Re: LA Responds to Critizism

Quote:
Originally Posted by RiggoRules View Post
One of the interesting aspects of the story is the issue of the Redskins playbook that Lavar now refers to as "Arrington property now. New York Giants property now."

Not certain, but I thought that walking with a playbook when you left a team was a big legal issue.


It is a team rule that when you go out, the playbook goes in. There's no way he has the teams playbook to give to the Giants, even if it were true, he'd be a fool to admit it. I don't believe one word of it, it's just LaVar being LaVar running off at the mouth again. What he needs to be concerned with (since he's going to try and play defense) is the offense's playbook. You know, even a fish would avoid being caught if he kept his mouth shut, and for some reason this is something LaVar has never learned to do.
Longtimefan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2006, 03:35 PM   #56
illdefined
Playmaker
 
illdefined's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 48
Posts: 2,631
Re: LA Responds to Critizism

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
It really doesn't matter if he has a playbook or not.

Any team can look at film and see what other teams do.

It's the game plan that matters.

yeah but having Gregg William's crazy zones all convienently diagrammed up would be a boon for ANYbody.

what worries me more is deciphering the calls. on offense or defense, they'll be able to read the hand signals and adjust.

remember the 36-0 whipping? i think the week BEFORE they had just finished getting a Redskin (Pierce, Hasselbeck or Morton) and got all the fresh calls.
__________________
a fan. not a cheerleader.
illdefined is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2006, 03:40 PM   #57
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,569
Re: LA Responds to Critizism

The playbook thing is a non-issue. It all comes down to execution. The 36-0 loss they hung on us last year had more to do with them riding an emotional high that we couldn't match than having a few ex-Redskins on their roster. It sure didn't help them in the December rematch.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2006, 04:11 PM   #58
Redskins8588
Playmaker
 
Redskins8588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ridgway, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 2,519
Re: LA Responds to Critizism

Even still what hand signals will LaVar know for our offense? I mean even though Saunders and Gibbs offense are very similar, I highly doubt that they use the same hand signals and audibles and what not...

Also, dont think that for a minute that our guys have forgot about the 36-0 embarrassment of a game that was last year. So I expect our guys to be just as pumped as to not let that happen again...
__________________
"I am the best at what I do, and what I do isn't very nice" - Sean Taylor
Redskins8588 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2006, 04:13 PM   #59
dmek25
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
Re: LA Responds to Critizism

execution, exexcution, and execution. and besides, what the hell was morton going to show them? he barely grazed the field while he was here. you can know whats coming, but if we execute, the play will still work
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
courtesy of 53fan
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2006, 04:16 PM   #60
Redskins8588
Playmaker
 
Redskins8588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ridgway, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 2,519
Re: LA Responds to Critizism

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmek25 View Post
execution, exexcution, and execution. and besides, what the hell was morton going to show them? he barely grazed the field while he was here. you can know whats coming, but if we execute, the play will still work
I have to agree, it really all comes down to execution, I mean look at the cheifs last year, everyone and their brother knew that KC was going to run the ball, and yet LJ still got crazy stats!!!
__________________
"I am the best at what I do, and what I do isn't very nice" - Sean Taylor
Redskins8588 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.10539 seconds with 10 queries