if campbell doesn't start next week

70Chip · 11-12-2006, 11:00 PM

Just for the record, when they list Campbell as the emergency QB, that means that they cannot play any other QB after he goes in. So, any switch today would have been to Collins because that leaves the option of putting Brunell or Campbell back in if necessary. Once Campbell is declared THE STARTER, Collins would likely be the emergency QB with Brunell #2. Also, I believe the emergency QB is technically inactive for the game.

If I got any of this wrong, I'm sure you all will correct me.

steveo395 · 11-12-2006, 11:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 70Chip

Just for the record, when they list Campbell as the emergency QB, that means that they cannot play any other QB after he goes in. So, any switch today would have been to Collins because that leaves the option of putting Brunell or Campbell back in if necessary. Once Campbell is declared THE STARTER, Collins would likely be the emergency QB with Brunell #2. Also, I believe the emergency QB is technically inactive for the game.

If I got any of this wrong, I'm sure you all will correct me.

The emergency QB is only allowed to come in if the first 2 QBs get hurt, or if it's the 4th quarter.

skinsguy · 11-12-2006, 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Twilbert07

Yes, Gibbs is way too loyal to Brunell. Sadly, Gibbs' loyalty to him has made this a wasted season. And I'm not saying it's all Brunell's fault.

???? You're not saying it's MB's fault, but Gibbs' loyality to MB has made this a losing season. Certainly sounds like it's his fault to me.

GTripp0012 · 11-12-2006, 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Twilbert07

I've said it all season: Jason Campbell could have started out 2-5 or 3-6 - just like wily veteran Brunell - and had half a season under his belt.

Good point, although hindsight is 20/20. No one preseason thought this would be a season in which we would lose to Minnesota and Tennessee. We really should be 5-4 right now under Brunell, but thats something you can't change at this point. You can only work foward, see if we can beat Tampa Bay, and if not then play for next season.

Twilbert07 · 11-13-2006, 09:52 AM

Gibbs will stick with Brunell, and we'll lose again this weekend.

Pocket$ $traight · 11-13-2006, 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Twilbert07

Gibbs will stick with Brunell, and we'll lose again this weekend.

The Bucs are bad. I think that any of our QB's could get us a win against them.

redsk1 · 11-12-2006, 06:50 PM

This just in... MB cannot handle the blitz. If we all know this ya think other teams do? It's time for a change at qb (even if its collins).

GTripp0012 · 11-12-2006, 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redsk1

This just in... MB cannot handle the blitz. If we all know this ya think other teams do? It's time for a change at qb (even if its collins).

A lot of these points there is no defense for, but when you consistently see recievers not reading blitz, not adjusting their routes, not looking back for the ball, the QB is going to get killed. Every time. Eagles blitzed and Brunell had no place to go with the football.

And for the record, changing to Collins is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard. What is he going to do better than Brunell? You'd go to Campbell because he's going to be around next year, and he might do one or two things better right now.

Sheriff Gonna Getcha · 11-12-2006, 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

A lot of these points there is no defense for, but when you consistently see recievers not reading blitz, not adjusting their routes, not looking back for the ball, the QB is going to get killed. Every time. Eagles blitzed and Brunell had no place to go with the football.

The Eagles blitzed as much as they did because they, like every other team, have no respect for our deep passing game.

GREENSTHEMAN · 11-12-2006, 07:30 PM

I felt that the Skin's should have had Collins at QB this game, simply because he knows Al's system, after losing this week I think they should got to Jason to develop him the rest of the year.

Brunnell does not have enough zip when he needs it anymore, and the legs have gotten slower than they have been.

I have confidence that Gibbs will make the change, I think Gibbs realizes he has gone above and beyond how long he has stuck by Brunnell.

There has never been a player with more talented and humble than Darrel Green !!!!

skinsfan69 · 11-12-2006, 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GREENSTHEMAN

I felt that the Skin's should have had Collins at QB this game, simply because he knows Al's system, after losing this week I think they should got to Jason to develop him the rest of the year.

Brunnell does not have enough zip when he needs it anymore, and the legs have gotten slower than they have been.

I have confidence that Gibbs will make the change, I think Gibbs realizes he has gone above and beyond how long he has stuck by Brunnell.

There has never been a player with more talented and humble than Darrel Green !!!!

Saunders system????? Screw his stupid ass system! How about getting in the Qb in which you have 2 #1 picks invested in and having a smaller game plan. Then go in with a small game plan and EXECUTE THE PLAYS. I'm so tired of this 700 page playbook BS. The Colts run a basic offense. Wayne on the left and Harrison on the right and they don't use any motion. They just frickin execute better than anyone else. Of course having Manning doesn't hurt but I'm sure you people out there get my point.

GREENSTHEMAN · 11-12-2006, 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

Saunders system????? Screw his stupid ass system! How about getting in the Qb in which you have 2 #1 picks invested in and having a smaller game plan. Then go in with a small game plan and EXECUTE THE PLAYS. I'm so tired of this 700 page playbook BS. The Colts run a basic offense. Wayne on the left and Harrison on the right and they don't use any motion. They just frickin execute better than anyone else. Of course having Manning doesn't hurt but I'm sure you people out there get my point.

For whatever it's worth he is the most familiar with it, in my mind he could not have done any worse than Brunnell, for this last thrashing we took. But from here out I do believe that Jason should be in at QB.

I felt that when they brought Saunders in it was yet another system that players where going to have to adjust to, breaking any consistancy in Gibbs system which got the Skin's to the playoffs.

I am sick of players having to adjust to a new coaching system every year or two.

Sheriff Gonna Getcha · 11-12-2006, 10:01 PM

Did anyone watch Gibbs' post-game press conference? He seemed to imply that he was going to stick by Brunell. Sorry, I can't quote him.

RobH4413 · 11-12-2006, 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sheriff Gonna Getcha

Did anyone watch Gibbs' post-game press conference? He seemed to imply that he was going to stick by Brunell. Sorry, I can't quote him.

Not sure, I heard someone ask about the QB situation and I can just remember him saying he wasn't going to address it.

Sheriff Gonna Getcha · 11-12-2006, 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RobH4413

Not sure, I heard someone ask about the QB situation and I can just remember him saying he wasn't going to address it.

I just read Jason LaCanfora's blog and he seemed to think Gibbs implied that he was probably going to stick with Brunell.

11-13-2006, 09:52 AM	#5
Twilbert07 Impact Rookie Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Atlanta, GA Age: 61 Posts: 594	Re: if campbell doesn't start next week Gibbs will stick with Brunell, and we'll lose again this weekend. __________________ a Skins fan every day, every way.

11-12-2006, 06:50 PM	#7
redsk1 The Starter Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 2,351	Re: if campbell doesn't start next week This just in... MB cannot handle the blitz. If we all know this ya think other teams do? It's time for a change at qb (even if its collins).

11-12-2006, 07:30 PM	#10
GREENSTHEMAN Camp Scrub Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 31	Re: if campbell doesn't start next week I felt that the Skin's should have had Collins at QB this game, simply because he knows Al's system, after losing this week I think they should got to Jason to develop him the rest of the year. Brunnell does not have enough zip when he needs it anymore, and the legs have gotten slower than they have been. I have confidence that Gibbs will make the change, I think Gibbs realizes he has gone above and beyond how long he has stuck by Brunnell. There has never been a player with more talented and humble than Darrel Green !!!!

11-12-2006, 10:01 PM	#13
Sheriff Gonna Getcha Franchise Player Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 47 Posts: 8,317	Re: if campbell doesn't start next week Did anyone watch Gibbs' post-game press conference? He seemed to imply that he was going to stick by Brunell. Sorry, I can't quote him.

11-12-2006, 11:00 PM	#1
70Chip Playmaker Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Manassas Age: 55 Posts: 3,048	Re: if campbell doesn't start next week Just for the record, when they list Campbell as the emergency QB, that means that they cannot play any other QB after he goes in. So, any switch today would have been to Collins because that leaves the option of putting Brunell or Campbell back in if necessary. Once Campbell is declared THE STARTER, Collins would likely be the emergency QB with Brunell #2. Also, I believe the emergency QB is technically inactive for the game. If I got any of this wrong, I'm sure you all will correct me. __________________ This Monkey's Gone to Heaven

if campbell doesn't start next week

Locker Room Main Forum