Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


WP: Redskins Targeting London Fletcher, Nate Clements

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-14-2007, 10:07 AM   #1
Skinz4life
Camp Scrub
 
Skinz4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Syracuse, UT
Posts: 65
Re: WP: Redskins Targeting London Fletcher, Nate Clements

This is just another example for us all as to why the draft is so important. Without any picks we are forced to go out and spend more more than we should on an aging player insteading of using the draft to develope our own talent. If you make a mistake on someone in the 2nd or 3rd round it doesn't cost as much, but when you miss on a high priced free agent you end up with last years team.
Skinz4life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2007, 10:59 AM   #2
#56fanatic
The Starter
 
#56fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Charlotte NC
Age: 51
Posts: 1,801
Re: WP: Redskins Targeting London Fletcher, Nate Clements

Quote:
Originally Posted by TAFKAS View Post
I thought the Postons were suspended anyway. So who's representing Lavar these days? Is it #56fanatic?
I wish, I could use the percentage of his last contract.
#56fanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2007, 09:54 AM   #3
FRPLG
MVP
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 10,164
Re: WP: Redskins Targeting London Fletcher, Nate Clements

Only Carl is suspended. The other (Kevin?) is still allowed to operate.
FRPLG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2007, 10:00 AM   #4
JankySpanky80
Special Teams
 
JankySpanky80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 267
Re: WP: Redskins Targeting London Fletcher, Nate Clements

Whether fans like it or not. Clements and Fletcher are GW's Boys. Look at posey. we signed him right up when he was released. Snyder will throw godly amounts of money at these guys and Fans will be excited at first. By week 5 we'll looking forward to next year already.
__________________
JANK-e SPANK-e
JankySpanky80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2007, 10:07 AM   #5
mooby
Hug Anne Spyder
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,596
Re: WP: Redskins Targeting London Fletcher, Nate Clements

I'm all for Clements and Fletcher, but Fletcher isn't a long term solution, I'd sign him to a 2 year deal or something along those lines until we can find that long term solution at MLB.
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2007, 10:23 AM   #6
dmek25
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 64
Posts: 10,672
Re: WP: Redskins Targeting London Fletcher, Nate Clements

welcome skinz, and the last sentence in your post is a great line. maybe a signature for someone?
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
courtesy of 53fan
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2007, 10:31 AM   #7
hesscl34
Registered User
 
hesscl34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 2,782
Re: WP: Redskins Targeting London Fletcher, Nate Clements

As long as we hold onto Brunell I'll be happy....
hesscl34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2007, 10:37 AM   #8
12thMan
MVP
 
12thMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
Re: WP: Redskins Targeting London Fletcher, Nate Clements

Quote:
Originally Posted by hesscl34 View Post
As long as we hold onto Brunell I'll be happy....

We holding on to Brunell? Sounds like you want to be holding on to Brunell to me
12thMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2007, 10:35 AM   #9
hail_2_da_skins
Impact Rookie
 
hail_2_da_skins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Age: 70
Posts: 868
Re: WP: Redskins Targeting London Fletcher, Nate Clements

STOP THE MADNESS...The Skins need to stop overspending for mediocre free agents. London Fletcher was good 5 years ago. Dropping a ton of money on him is like signing his ex-teammate Adam Archuleta. DON'T DO IT. Clements would be a nice pickup but at what cost. At some point the Redskins need to get their finances in order and start acquiring young talent. That's done through the draft. Stop giving away draft picks like they are Christmas presents. Every off-season, the Skins make a big deal of over-spending on these so-called big named free agents and getting the Skins fans excited. And every year its been the same result - DISAPPOINTMENT.
__________________
"HAIL TO THE SKINS"
hail_2_da_skins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2007, 10:49 AM   #10
FRPLG
MVP
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 10,164
Re: WP: Redskins Targeting London Fletcher, Nate Clements

Quote:
Originally Posted by hail_2_da_skins View Post
STOP THE MADNESS...The Skins need to stop overspending for mediocre free agents. London Fletcher was good 5 years ago.
Respectfully, you are clueless.

Year Team G Total Tkl Ast Sacks Int Yds Avg Lg TD Pass Def
1998 St. Louis Rams 16 28 25.0 3 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0
1999 St. Louis Rams 16 90 66.0 24 3 0 0 0.0 0 0 2
2000 St. Louis Rams 16 132 105.0 27 5.5 4 33 8.2 12 0 4
2001 St. Louis Rams 16 116 89.0 27 4.5 2 18 9.0 18 0 3
2002 Buffalo Bills 16 147 97.0 50 3 0 0 0.0 0 0 2
2003 Buffalo Bills 16 133 96.0 37 2 0 0 0.0 0 0 4
2004 Buffalo Bills 16 142 92.0 50 3.5 0 0 0.0 0 0 3
2005 Buffalo Bills 16 157 104.0 53 4 1 20 20.0 20 0 2
2006 Buffalo Bills 16 146 104.0 42 2 4 30 7.5 17 1 7


Fletcher had arguably his best season of his career last year.

He was probably the best MLB in the league last year.
FRPLG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2007, 11:00 AM   #11
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,591
Re: WP: Redskins Targeting London Fletcher, Nate Clements

Quote:
Originally Posted by FRPLG View Post
Respectfully, you are clueless.

Year Team G Total Tkl Ast Sacks Int Yds Avg Lg TD Pass Def
1998 St. Louis Rams 16 28 25.0 3 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0
1999 St. Louis Rams 16 90 66.0 24 3 0 0 0.0 0 0 2
2000 St. Louis Rams 16 132 105.0 27 5.5 4 33 8.2 12 0 4
2001 St. Louis Rams 16 116 89.0 27 4.5 2 18 9.0 18 0 3
2002 Buffalo Bills 16 147 97.0 50 3 0 0 0.0 0 0 2
2003 Buffalo Bills 16 133 96.0 37 2 0 0 0.0 0 0 4
2004 Buffalo Bills 16 142 92.0 50 3.5 0 0 0.0 0 0 3
2005 Buffalo Bills 16 157 104.0 53 4 1 20 20.0 20 0 2
2006 Buffalo Bills 16 146 104.0 42 2 4 30 7.5 17 1 7


Fletcher had arguably his best season of his career last year.

He was probably the best MLB in the league last year.
Buff has a better defense. I would say Buff's d-line is a little more sturdy than ours. He could really struggle on our defense if we don't improve the line. But since we don't have draft picks than this is the option.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2007, 11:40 AM   #12
hail_2_da_skins
Impact Rookie
 
hail_2_da_skins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Age: 70
Posts: 868
Re: WP: Redskins Targeting London Fletcher, Nate Clements

Quote:
Originally Posted by FRPLG View Post
Respectfully, you are clueless.

Year Team G Total Tkl Ast Sacks Int Yds Avg Lg TD Pass Def
1998 St. Louis Rams 16 28 25.0 3 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0
1999 St. Louis Rams 16 90 66.0 24 3 0 0 0.0 0 0 2
2000 St. Louis Rams 16 132 105.0 27 5.5 4 33 8.2 12 0 4
2001 St. Louis Rams 16 116 89.0 27 4.5 2 18 9.0 18 0 3
2002 Buffalo Bills 16 147 97.0 50 3 0 0 0.0 0 0 2
2003 Buffalo Bills 16 133 96.0 37 2 0 0 0.0 0 0 4
2004 Buffalo Bills 16 142 92.0 50 3.5 0 0 0.0 0 0 3
2005 Buffalo Bills 16 157 104.0 53 4 1 20 20.0 20 0 2
2006 Buffalo Bills 16 146 104.0 42 2 4 30 7.5 17 1 7


Fletcher had arguably his best season of his career last year.

He was probably the best MLB in the league last year.
CLUELESS here!

I live in St Louis and I've seen a lot of London Fletcher. He is a solid linebacker but is near the end of his career. My statement about mediocre free agent signings has to do with the Redskins past signings, not Fletcher's worth. Fletcher is a quality guy but what is it going to cost, that's my point. If you read and comprehended my post, that's what I said. The Redskins need to stop this pattern of going after free agents year after year. I don't see the payoff.
__________________
"HAIL TO THE SKINS"
hail_2_da_skins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2007, 05:16 PM   #13
JDALY27
Special Teams
 
JDALY27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Age: 47
Posts: 271
Re: WP: Redskins Targeting London Fletcher, Nate Clements

Quote:
Originally Posted by FRPLG View Post
Respectfully, you are clueless.

Year Team G Total Tkl Ast Sacks Int Yds Avg Lg TD Pass Def
1998 St. Louis Rams 16 28 25.0 3 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0
1999 St. Louis Rams 16 90 66.0 24 3 0 0 0.0 0 0 2
2000 St. Louis Rams 16 132 105.0 27 5.5 4 33 8.2 12 0 4
2001 St. Louis Rams 16 116 89.0 27 4.5 2 18 9.0 18 0 3
2002 Buffalo Bills 16 147 97.0 50 3 0 0 0.0 0 0 2
2003 Buffalo Bills 16 133 96.0 37 2 0 0 0.0 0 0 4
2004 Buffalo Bills 16 142 92.0 50 3.5 0 0 0.0 0 0 3
2005 Buffalo Bills 16 157 104.0 53 4 1 20 20.0 20 0 2
2006 Buffalo Bills 16 146 104.0 42 2 4 30 7.5 17 1 7


Fletcher had arguably his best season of his career last year.

He was probably the best MLB in the league last year.
Do you know who Brian Urlacher is? Even Zack the crack Thomas!!
JDALY27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2007, 01:27 PM   #14
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: WP: Redskins Targeting London Fletcher, Nate Clements

Quote:
Originally Posted by hail_2_da_skins View Post
STOP THE MADNESS...The Skins need to stop overspending for mediocre free agents. London Fletcher was good 5 years ago. Dropping a ton of money on him is like signing his ex-teammate Adam Archuleta. DON'T DO IT. Clements would be a nice pickup but at what cost. At some point the Redskins need to get their finances in order and start acquiring young talent. That's done through the draft. Stop giving away draft picks like they are Christmas presents. Every off-season, the Skins make a big deal of over-spending on these so-called big named free agents and getting the Skins fans excited. And every year its been the same result - DISAPPOINTMENT.
We certainly have to stop giving up the picks, but we can't just stop signing players to fill holes. The key with a deal to Fletcher is that it has to be cheap to get out of after the 2nd or 3rd year of it. Reasonable signing bonus, no massive roster bonuses before then, keep the base salaries low for the first 2-3 years.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2007, 10:35 AM   #15
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
Re: WP: Redskins Targeting London Fletcher, Nate Clements

there are 5-6 teams that refuse to deal with the postons i believe. and as was noted early, one i fighting a suspension, the other is still able to conduct business as usual.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.04694 seconds with 10 queries