![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
Whatever. King is just throwing his opinion out there. Some points he makes will actaully be right (Donovan won't be as hot as he was in 2006 again), Others (such as Romo and Young being more productive than McNabb) will be wrong. That's not a big deal.
Speaking of opinions, heres how I would have done it: 1. Peyton Manning 2. Everyone else With everyone else listed in this order: 2. Marc Bulger 3. Phillip Rivers 4. Matt Leinart 5. Tom Brady 6. Carson Palmer 7. Matt Hasselbeck 8. Matt Schaub 9. Ben Roethlisberger 10. Drew Brees 11. Donovan McNabb 12. Jason Campbell 13. Byron Leftwich 14. Jay Cutler 15. Vince Young 16. Eli Manning 17. Chad Pennington 18. Steve McNair 19. Jon Kitna 20. Jeff Garcia 21. Trent Green 22. Alex Smith 23. Rex Grossman 24. Tony Romo 25. Jake Delhomme 26. Brett Favre 27. Michael Vick 28. Josh McCown 29. Brodie Croyle 30. Charlie Frye 31. JP Losman 32. Tavaris Jackson |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
You did WHAT?!?
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 37
Posts: 14,189
|
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
Quote:
I was with you up until number 2
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,115
|
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
Quote:
Rivers at #3? Leinart at #4? Brees at #10? Schaub at #8? I must say one thing, at least you're consistent in your "unique" views around here. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
Quote:
BTW, anyone who wants in on this can. It'd be fun to make a competition out of this. I think people will be quite surprised. (well, either that or I will) Problem is that everyone will use last year as a baseline for their picks. That will give me a big advantage. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 45
Posts: 19,272
|
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
Quote:
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
Quote:
I'm saying that people tend to use the previous season as the baseline for all projections, despite piles of evidence that says 16 games one year will produce very different results from 16 games the next year. I believe by looking at career path projections and career production, I can see the wider picture and project for the current season accordingly. Even still, that doesn't make me anymore right than anyone else. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Age: 60
Posts: 1,176
|
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
None of this means anything at all. It's the off season and the ass clown PK needs to justify a paycheck.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
Quote:
Time to see for myself. I want to see the changes you would make to King's list. I'm basically calling you out on this one. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,115
|
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
Quote:
How are we going to judge this? Will it be based on passer rating? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
Quote:
My beef with passer rating as a stat is well documented, but I think in this case it represents a solid middle ground between the stats that I use, and something completely unhelpful like passing yards or something. I'd be cool with passer rating. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,656
|
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
Quote:
Also how in the world do you have Schaub ahead of McNabb and Brees? That's nuts! McNabb and Brees are MVP type of players. Brees could have easily won the MVP last year. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
Quote:
McNabb, Palmer, Brees, and Brady are and will always be successful quarterbacks, but the idea is to pick the guys who are the best in their field for this year. And Rivers, Leinart and Schaub definately fit the criteria. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,656
|
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
Quote:
Schaub is playing behind a poor line and has only one target at WR. Who is the Texans 2nd wr option?? He's going to struggle. Leinart could be a top ten but you have him as a top 3. That's probably a little too much of a jump. Remember he is playing in his 3rd offense in three years and he was up and down last year. Plus Arizona has a suspect line as well. The guy I would look to have a breakout year is JP Loosman. I would have him rated way above Schaub. He really came on at the end of last year. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
Quote:
It's impossible for me to predict who will have the biggest role in their offense. That's why I rank the players based on the assumption that they will all throw an equal amount of passes, and hope that my rankings are proven correct. Leinart could finish 3 or 9 (or somewhere in between), but as long as he establishes himself as a clear cut pro bowl talent this year, I'll consider myself correct. Just be aware that I'm not worried about the talent around a guy in my rankings. Of course that will affect his yardage totals, but I don't put a lot of stock into pure yardage. I'm worried about what a guy does with the opps he has. Schaub and Leinart were phenominal college players with lots of expeience who have shown some great things in limited time at the pro level. No reason to think that they won't be top ten passers this year. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,115
|
Re: Peter King Expects Jason Campbell to be 26th Most Productive 2007 QB
McNabb put up HUGE numbers in 2004, so I'm not sure why anyone would consider what he did last year until he got injured a "mirage".
In fact if you look at his last two injury plagued seasons, if you project those numbers out over a full season his numbers would be pretty much right in line with his 2004 season. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|