Jansen's dislocated ankle

jsarno · 09-10-2007, 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schneed10

Did anybody really think he had a shot at playing again this season? I knew he was gone the moment I saw it on TV. In fact, I was thinking possible career-ender.

I guess you might think he could come back if you didn't get a look at the ankle.

It was a compound fracture, he was bleeding because the bone broke through the skin. The foot was turned at exactly a 90 degree angle to the right. It was Theismannesque, but I guess nobody got a good look at it?

HOLY CRAP! That sounds horrible...I haven't seen any pics on this.

Schneed10 · 09-10-2007, 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jsarno

HOLY CRAP! That sounds horrible...I haven't seen any pics on this.

At your own risk, of course...

Win also brings a crucial loss*-*-*The Washington Times, America's Newspaper

MTK · 09-10-2007, 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schneed10

At your own risk, of course...

Win also brings a crucial loss*-*-*The Washington Times, America's Newspaper

god damn

I hope he makes it back

jsarno · 09-10-2007, 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schneed10

At your own risk, of course...

Win also brings a crucial loss*-*-*The Washington Times, America's Newspaper

Wow...I didn't realize it was THAT bad.

budw38 · 09-10-2007, 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schneed10

Did anybody really think he had a shot at playing again this season? I knew he was gone the moment I saw it on TV. In fact, I was thinking possible career-ender.

I guess you might think he could come back if you didn't get a look at the ankle.

It was a compound fracture, he was bleeding because the bone broke through the skin. The foot was turned at exactly a 90 degree angle to the right. It was Theismannesque, but I guess nobody got a good look at it?

I knew better than to look at the replay . My first thought was poor Jansen < one of the toughest & most dedicated Skin I have seen > , and I had a bad feeling that it was ugly . Lets all hope he recovers at/ near 100% . And For the 2 or 3 % of you that gloat when other players are hurt ie; Holdman / Glenn ,,,,,,, you are sad people ,, IMO and I doubt Gibbs would think much of your character ?

Skinsfan1967 · 09-10-2007, 04:40 PM

NFL Network just said Jansen out for the season.

jbcjr14 · 09-10-2007, 04:44 PM

I think he is done for the year, but we shall wait for Gibbs presser today. The pictures that the washingtontimes.com has up are pretty damn knarly! I won't link them because some can't stomach them.

jsarno · 09-10-2007, 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jbcjr14

I think he is done for the year, but we shall wait for Gibbs presser today. The pictures that the washingtontimes.com has up are pretty damn knarly! I won't link them because some can't stomach them.

You can still post the link here then just a give a warning about it.

Schneed10 · 09-10-2007, 04:46 PM

The only reason Wade didn't replace Jansen yesterday was because Wade was inactive, partly because of the sore shoulder, but mainly because the Skins didn't think they'd need him. The shoulder thing is minor, and now that the Skins know they'll need him, he'll be the starter.

There's no way Stephon Heyer could ever be considered a better choice at RT than Todd Wade. RT is exactly where Wade belongs - and to be truthful - I see no downgrade going from Jansen to Wade.

It's just our T depth is thin now. Heyer is an adequate backup, but I don't want him starting. Did we notice how absent Cooley was yesterday? That's because he was helping Heyer in pass protection. We need him running routes, so we need Wade to hold his own.

RedskinPete · 09-10-2007, 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schneed10

The only reason Wade didn't replace Jansen yesterday was because Wade was inactive, partly because of the sore shoulder, but mainly because the Skins didn't think they'd need him. The shoulder thing is minor, and now that the Skins know they'll need him, he'll be the starter.

There's no way Stephon Heyer could ever be considered a better choice at RT than Todd Wade. RT is exactly where Wade belongs - and to be truthful - I see no downgrade going from Jansen to Wade.

It's just our T depth is thin now. Heyer is an adequate backup, but I don't want him starting. Did we notice how absent Cooley was yesterday? That's because he was helping Heyer in pass protection. We need him running routes, so we need Wade to hold his own.

One thing is for sure Heyer has a much higher up side and I don't believe Wade is that much ahead. I bet by season end we all will say Heyer is our biggest surpries and it will not be the highest need in the o8 draft!

Schneed10 · 09-10-2007, 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedskinPete

One thing is for sure Heyer has a much higher up side and I don't believe Wade is that much ahead. I bet by season end we all will say Heyer is our biggest surpries and it will not be the highest need in the o8 draft!

But how do we know he played so well?? Cooley was in his hip pocket the whole time on pass protection. The coaches obviously didn't feel comfortable letting Cooley go out to run routes with him in there. That should tell you everything you need to know. And without Cooley, our offense is limited.

The fans are WAAAY overrating Stephon Heyer. Wade can play on an island in pass protection, that's the strong suit in his game. I guess nobody remembers how well he played for us as a sub last year.

If we play Heyer, prepare yourself for Cooley to disappear to a year of pass blocking. If we play Wade, we lose nothing.

RedskinPete · 09-10-2007, 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schneed10

But how do we know he played so well?? Cooley was in his hip pocket the whole time on pass protection. The coaches obviously didn't feel comfortable letting Cooley go out to run routes with him in there. That should tell you everything you need to know. And without Cooley, our offense is limited.

The fans are WAAAY overrating Stephon Heyer. Wade can play on an island in pass protection, that's the strong suit in his game. I guess nobody remembers how well he played for us as a sub last year.

If we play Heyer, prepare yourself for Cooley to disappear to a year of pass blocking. If we play Wade, we lose nothing.

You maybe right about Heyer but I have seen NOTHING that tells me Wade can do what you say he can!

70Chip · 09-10-2007, 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedskinPete

You maybe right about Heyer but I have seen NOTHING that tells me Wade can do what you say he can!

Wade is outstanding in pass pro at the Tackle position. If he's healthy I would play him. Don't judge Tackle Wade by what you saw from Guard Wade.

RobH4413 · 09-10-2007, 05:05 PM

"As for recovery time, Jansen said: "In 3-4 months, I should be ready to play football. It will be about six weeks in a cast with crutches. I'll be able to start in a walking boot and put some pressure on it. By 10-12 weeks, I should be running. ... I know I'll be able to bounce back from this."

From The Washington Times, America's Newspaper

At least he's got a good attitude about it.

jsarno · 09-10-2007, 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RobH4413

"As for recovery time, Jansen said: "In 3-4 months, I should be ready to play football. It will be about six weeks in a cast with crutches. I'll be able to start in a walking boot and put some pressure on it. By 10-12 weeks, I should be running. ... I know I'll be able to bounce back from this."

From The Washington Times, America's Newspaper

At least he's got a good attitude about it.

In 3-4 months, I should be ready to play football.
Hell yeah Jansen! We all would love to see that! It's possible for him to only miss 11 or 12 games then. We could have him back for the important last 4 games and a playoff run!

09-10-2007, 04:40 PM	#6
Skinsfan1967 Special Teams Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Frederick, Maryland Age: 59 Posts: 254	Re: Jansen's discolated ankle NFL Network just said Jansen out for the season. __________________ Yellow41 on Redskinsheads

09-10-2007, 04:44 PM	#7
jbcjr14 The Starter Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Austin, Texas Age: 56 Posts: 2,015	Re: Jansen's discolated ankle I think he is done for the year, but we shall wait for Gibbs presser today. The pictures that the washingtontimes.com has up are pretty damn knarly! I won't link them because some can't stomach them. __________________ "Work Harder: millions on welfare are counting on you" - Obama 2009 address to Congress.

09-10-2007, 04:46 PM	#9
Schneed10 A Dude Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Newtown Square, PA Age: 46 Posts: 12,458	Re: Jansen's discolated ankle The only reason Wade didn't replace Jansen yesterday was because Wade was inactive, partly because of the sore shoulder, but mainly because the Skins didn't think they'd need him. The shoulder thing is minor, and now that the Skins know they'll need him, he'll be the starter. There's no way Stephon Heyer could ever be considered a better choice at RT than Todd Wade. RT is exactly where Wade belongs - and to be truthful - I see no downgrade going from Jansen to Wade. It's just our T depth is thin now. Heyer is an adequate backup, but I don't want him starting. Did we notice how absent Cooley was yesterday? That's because he was helping Heyer in pass protection. We need him running routes, so we need Wade to hold his own. __________________ God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.

09-10-2007, 05:05 PM	#14
RobH4413 Wildcard Bitches Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Bethesda, MD Age: 41 Posts: 2,638	Re: Jansen's discolated ankle "As for recovery time, Jansen said: "In 3-4 months, I should be ready to play football. It will be about six weeks in a cast with crutches. I'll be able to start in a walking boot and put some pressure on it. By 10-12 weeks, I should be running. ... I know I'll be able to bounce back from this." From The Washington Times, America's Newspaper At least he's got a good attitude about it. __________________ This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps!

Jansen's dislocated ankle

Locker Room Main Forum