Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Mock Database Update (1/30)

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-04-2009, 10:11 AM   #1
Skinny Tee
The Starter
 
Skinny Tee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Redskins Nation
Posts: 1,715
Re: Mock Database Update (1/30)

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goat View Post
Definitely wish we had our second round pick bro but beyond that i'm not real psyched about the depth of this draft. Basically if we can select a franchise player, preferably an OT or OLB, @ 13 i'll be satisfied.
I'd hate to see what our o-line looks like if we pick a LB with the 13th.

Reinhardt was a 3rd round pick and he's having a hard time dressing for games. If we have that same success next year's team won't be pretty.
__________________
Redskinsly,
_________Skinny Tee_________
Skinny Tee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2009, 03:50 PM   #2
PennSkinsFan
Impact Rookie
 
PennSkinsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Age: 55
Posts: 752
Re: Mock Database Update (1/30)

2009 NFL Mock Draft Database

Updated with 177 mock drafts and now have 37 mocks updated in FEB.

We also have updated our Mock Database consensus picks, consensus from the mock drafts that have updated over the last 6 days. That includes the Redskins pick at #13.
__________________
DC Pro Sports Report - Home of the Internet's Largest NFL Mock Draft Database. Best Redskins Redskins discussion, theWarpath.net

PennSkinsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2009, 03:01 AM   #3
LandrySlice
Special Teams
 
LandrySlice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: AFGHANISTAN
Posts: 335
Re: Mock Database Update (1/30)

If we get Smith and have him play either OT or G I would be so happy! It would be the first time ever Vinny would make a good move drafting at such a position. If we can't get one of these tackles, I think we need Maliluga, once in a decade type player and will be way better then Okarapo or whoever he is! But SmootSmack I hope you are correct!
__________________
Don't tase me bro!!!!
LandrySlice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2009, 01:28 PM   #4
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Mock Database Update (1/30)

What's wrong with Oher at 13?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2009, 01:56 PM   #5
Son Of Man
Impact Rookie
 
Son Of Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 643
Re: Mock Database Update (1/30)

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
What's wrong with Oher at 13?
Too many red flags (like effort during run blocking and ability to pick up a blitz scheme) in college no less. If we stay at 13, and Monroe and Smith are gone, take Maualuga and build a defense around that guy!!
Son Of Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2009, 04:52 PM   #6
WaldSkins
Playmaker
 
WaldSkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 42
Posts: 2,726
Re: Mock Database Update (1/30)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Son Of Man View Post
Too many red flags (like effort during run blocking and ability to pick up a blitz scheme) in college no less. If we stay at 13, and Monroe and Smith are gone, take Maualuga and build a defense around that guy!!




We need to build a offense. You know, the weakest part of the team for the last 10 years.
__________________
"I would change that around, Jesus isn't Cutler. I guarantee you Jesus couldnt thread the ball like Jay does."-Monksdown
WaldSkins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2009, 08:07 PM   #7
vallin21
The Starter
 
vallin21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,198
Re: Mock Database Update (1/30)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Son Of Man View Post
Too many red flags (like effort during run blocking and ability to pick up a blitz scheme) in college no less. If we stay at 13, and Monroe and Smith are gone, take Maualuga and build a defense around that guy!!


THAT MAKES ABSOLUTLEY NO SENSE!

First off, Malauga is a MLB we have Flecther for at least 2 (given he's healthy). Second Maualuga would not fill a need given that he is an OLB, and last time I checked our focuse was on OT, or OLB NOT MLB. You draft for need then talent, and if we can't draft an OT or an OLB (Curry) you trade down and get more picks. You don't build a defense around a MLB, you build on the D Line first.
vallin21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2009, 08:24 PM   #8
The Goat
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: Mock Database Update (1/30)

Quote:
Originally Posted by vallin21 View Post
[/B]

THAT MAKES ABSOLUTLEY NO SENSE!

First off, Malauga is a MLB we have Flecther for at least 2 (given he's healthy). Second Maualuga would not fill a need given that he is an OLB, and last time I checked our focuse was on OT, or OLB NOT MLB. You draft for need then talent, and if we can't draft an OT or an OLB (Curry) you trade down and get more picks. You don't build a defense around a MLB, you build on the D Line first.
I've asked this before w/o getting an answer: why couldn't Maualuga play OLB for a couple years before taking over for Fletcher? After all we originally drafted Blades as a MLB and whenever we need a guy to fill in, especially on the strong-side, he's our man.

... i'm not absolutely advocating Malauaga but saying if he's the very best talent left @ 13 (say all 4 1st round o tackles are gone or it comes down to Oher vs Malauaga vs Cushing) then we'd be wise to take him and let him play.
__________________
24-34
The Goat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2009, 09:56 PM   #9
vallin21
The Starter
 
vallin21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,198
Re: Mock Database Update (1/30)

The thing is I haven't seen him play OLB at USC, but maybe at the combine or when the Redskins visit with him they'll put him through some OLB drills, but from what I heard, his NFL stock is at MLB.
vallin21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2009, 01:49 PM   #10
redsk1
The Starter
 
redsk1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
Re: Mock Database Update (1/30)

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goat View Post
I've asked this before w/o getting an answer: why couldn't Maualuga play OLB for a couple years before taking over for Fletcher? After all we originally drafted Blades as a MLB and whenever we need a guy to fill in, especially on the strong-side, he's our man.

... i'm not absolutely advocating Malauaga but saying if he's the very best talent left @ 13 (say all 4 1st round o tackles are gone or it comes down to Oher vs Malauaga vs Cushing) then we'd be wise to take him and let him play.
After thinking about the possibility of drafting Rey Mal. i've come around a little bit. No we don't need a MLB. We need a pash rusher/DL/Ol. Think about some of the great pash rushers in todays game...Harrison, Woodley, Shawn Merriman, etc. Some play in the 4-3 granted, but his pass rushing skills might be beneficial. I don't know...just thinking out loud. If he falls, no doubt he's a great talent. I wish we had another 1st or a 2nd pick this year, b/c we need more than 1 good player.
redsk1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2009, 04:58 PM   #11
WaldSkins
Playmaker
 
WaldSkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 42
Posts: 2,726
Re: Mock Database Update (1/30)

Too the people who would like us to draft defense: Have you guys given up on JC? How can you expect him to improve if you don't get better in the trenches.
__________________
"I would change that around, Jesus isn't Cutler. I guarantee you Jesus couldnt thread the ball like Jay does."-Monksdown
WaldSkins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2009, 05:52 PM   #12
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Mock Database Update (1/30)

Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldSkins View Post
Too the people who would like us to draft defense: Have you guys given up on JC? How can you expect him to improve if you don't get better in the trenches.
Well, I think first and foremost is probably improving the entire team and that includes the d-line.

That's not to say we don't need help on the OL, we do of course.

Side note, I'm increasingly skeptical that Campbell is in their long range plans anyway. But that's another topic for another day.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2009, 06:04 PM   #13
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: Mock Database Update (1/30)

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Well, I think first and foremost is probably improving the entire team and that includes the d-line.

That's not to say we don't need help on the OL, we do of course.

Side note, I'm increasingly skeptical that Campbell is in their long range plans anyway. But that's another topic for another day.
Any particular reason? Are you hearing rumblings the rest of us aren't privy to?
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2009, 07:19 AM   #14
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Mock Database Update (1/30)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMScud View Post
Any particular reason? Are you hearing rumblings the rest of us aren't privy to?
No, let me just make this clear for a second here, I haven't heard anything to legitimately suggest they have any idea what they want to do at the QB position, with or without JC.

I have no inside knowledge on Campbell being let go or benched or anything like that. These are just my own suspicions.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You

Last edited by SmootSmack; 02-05-2009 at 09:23 AM.
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2009, 02:41 PM   #15
PennSkinsFan
Impact Rookie
 
PennSkinsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Age: 55
Posts: 752
Re: Mock Database Update (1/30)

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
No, let me just make this clear for a second here, I haven't heard anything to legitimately suggest they have any idea what they want to do at the QB position, with or without JC.

I have no inside knowledge on Campbell being let go or benched or anything like that. These are just my own suspicions.
Haven't heard a word about that either. In fact, from every indication out of Zorn and other sources, Zorn is pretty committed to JC. Taking a QB when you only have 4 picks and tons of needs simply doesn't make sense. So, yes, I can see Vinny doing it.
__________________
DC Pro Sports Report - Home of the Internet's Largest NFL Mock Draft Database. Best Redskins Redskins discussion, theWarpath.net

PennSkinsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.28355 seconds with 10 queries